John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu.
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jun 1;140(6):561-567. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.0889.
Many patients seen for eye-related issues in the emergency department do not receive recommended follow-up care. Prior evidence supports that scheduling appointments is a barrier to accomplishing the transition to outpatient ophthalmology care.
To evaluate time until appointment scheduling following emergency department discharge with urgent outpatient ophthalmology referral.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The A3 problem solving process was implemented by a multidisciplinary team as part of a structured quality improvement program with the goal of reducing the mean time between urgent referral placement in the emergency department and outpatient ophthalmology appointment scheduling. The study was conducted at Stanford Health Care, an academic medical center in Palo Alto, California, affiliated with Stanford University School of Medicine. Using medical center administrative records, all patients discharged from the adult emergency department with an urgent outpatient referral to the Stanford Department of Ophthalmology from August 9 to September 19, 2020 (baseline; n = 43), and from October 26 to November 29, 2020 (after implementation of all interventions; n = 21), were included.
Interventions developed to target the workflow of the ophthalmology resident, emergency department, ophthalmology clinic, and health system schedulers to address key drivers of the referral-scheduling process included medical record documentation guidelines, identification of responsible parties, preidentified appointment slots, patient education materials, and education of stakeholders, and were implemented by October 25, 2020.
Mean time between urgent referral placement (ie, emergency department discharge) and appointment scheduling with outpatient ophthalmology at baseline vs postintervention.
At baseline, appointments were scheduled a mean (range) 2.8 (0-7) days after referral placement. In the 5 weeks following implementation of interventions, the mean (range) decreased to 1.3 (0-4) days, a difference of 1.5 days (95% CI, 0.20-2.74; P = .02). This corresponds to 642 (95% CI, 86-1173) days of reduced patient wait time annually. In addition, there was less variability in the number of days between referral and appointment scheduling after intervention compared with baseline.
The results suggest improvement in efficiency of outpatient ophthalmology appointment scheduling of urgent emergency department referrals could be achieved through application of a quality improvement methodology by a multidisciplinary team representing key stakeholders in the process.
许多在急诊部门因眼部问题就诊的患者未接受推荐的随访护理。先前的证据表明,预约是将患者从急诊过渡到眼科门诊护理的障碍。
评估在紧急部门出院后进行紧急门诊眼科转诊后安排预约的时间。
设计、地点和参与者:多学科团队实施了 A3 问题解决流程,作为结构化质量改进计划的一部分,该计划的目标是减少急诊部门紧急转诊放置与眼科门诊预约安排之间的平均时间。该研究在斯坦福健康保健中心进行,该中心是加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托的一家学术医疗中心,隶属于斯坦福大学医学院。使用医疗中心管理记录,所有在 2020 年 8 月 9 日至 9 月 19 日(基线;n=43)和 2020 年 10 月 26 日至 11 月 29 日(在实施所有干预措施后;n=21)期间从成人急诊部门出院并被紧急转介到斯坦福眼科的患者,都包括在内。
为解决转诊-预约流程的关键驱动因素,针对眼科住院医师、急诊部门、眼科诊所和医疗系统调度员的工作流程制定了干预措施,包括病历记录指南、确定责任方、预先确定的预约时段、患者教育材料和利益相关者教育,并于 2020 年 10 月 25 日实施。
在基线时,紧急转诊(即急诊出院)与门诊眼科预约之间的平均(范围)时间。与干预前相比。
在基线时,预约安排在转诊放置后平均(范围)为 2.8(0-7)天。在实施干预措施后的 5 周内,平均值(范围)降至 1.3(0-4)天,差异为 1.5 天(95%置信区间,0.20-2.74;P=0.02)。这相当于每年减少 642(95%置信区间,86-1173)天的患者等待时间。此外,与基线相比,干预后转诊和预约之间的天数差异较小。
结果表明,通过多学科团队应用代表该过程中关键利益相关者的质量改进方法,可以提高紧急急诊转诊的眼科门诊预约安排效率。