• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.

作者信息

Hammarström M, Csemiczky G, Belfrage P

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(7):791-2. doi: 10.3109/00016348609161502.

DOI:10.3109/00016348609161502
PMID:3544665
Abstract

One hundred women for whom instrumental delivery had to be performed due to fetal asphyxia or uterine inertia were randomized to a vacuum extraction with the conventional Malmström instrument or the Silastic cup of Kobayashi. With the Silastic cup, extraction time was shorter and injuries to the scalp were less common. On the other hand, extraction with the Silastic cup failed more often, especially in occiput posterior position. There were no differences in Apgar scores between the two groups.

摘要

相似文献

1
Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(7):791-2. doi: 10.3109/00016348609161502.
2
Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.小林真空吸引器的临床评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):431-5.
3
Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov;66(5):624-8.
4
Vacuum extraction: a randomized controlled comparison of the New Generation cup with the original Bird cup.真空吸引术:新一代吸引杯与原始伯德杯的随机对照比较。
J Perinat Med. 1986;14(2):95-100. doi: 10.1515/jpme.1986.14.2.95.
5
A multicentre randomized trial comparing delivery with a silicone rubber cup and rigid metal vacuum extractor cups.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 May;96(5):545-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03253.x.
6
Vacuum extractor: a safe instrument?真空吸引器:一种安全的器械?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Aug;26(3):177-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01561.x.
7
Comparison between the conventional Malström extractor and a new extractor with silastic cup.传统马尔斯特勒姆拔牙器与带硅橡胶杯的新型拔牙器的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(3):283. doi: 10.3109/00016348709020765.
8
A randomized comparison of vacuum extraction delivery with a rigid and a pliable cup.
Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;82(2):280-4.
9
The importance of flexion in vacuum extractor delivery.真空吸引助产术中屈曲的重要性。
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976 Mar;83(3):194-200. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1976.tb00808.x.
10
Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(7):643-7. doi: 10.3109/00016348709022072.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.用于辅助阴道分娩的器械。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub3.
2
Exploring the reporting standards of RCTs involving invasive procedures for assisted vaginal birth: A systematic review.探讨涉及辅助阴道分娩的侵入性操作的 RCT 报告标准:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Jul;262:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.05.026. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Clinical impact of the disposable ventouse iCup® versus a metallic vacuum cup: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
一次性iCup®胎头吸引器与金属真空杯的临床影响:一项多中心随机对照试验
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 15;15:332. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0771-1.