• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小林真空吸引器的临床评估。

Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.

作者信息

Maryniak G M, Frank J B

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):431-5.

PMID:6462575
Abstract

Four hundred and thirty-one vacuum extraction deliveries were reviewed during a five-year period from 1978 to 1983. All cases involved the use of the Kobayashi silastic cup vacuum extractor with nine participating obstetricians performing the procedures. Specific attention was directed toward maternal and fetal morbidity associated with the use of the silastic cup extractor. No maternal or fetal deaths occurred. Vaginal and cervical lacerations accounted for a 4% maternal morbidity rate. Seventy-five percent of the infants had Apgar scores greater than 7 at one minute, and 97% had scores greater than 7 at five minutes. Fetal morbidity was impressively low, with a cephalohematoma rate of 6% and only two instances of major fetal cranial hemorrhages. In comparison with the reported morbidity sited by other authors using the metal cup extractor, less fetal scalp trauma may be anticipated with the judicious use of the Kobayashi silastic cup vacuum extractor.

摘要

对1978年至1983年五年间的431例真空吸引分娩进行了回顾。所有病例均使用小林硅橡胶杯真空吸引器,由9位参与的产科医生进行操作。特别关注与使用硅橡胶杯吸引器相关的母婴发病率。未发生母婴死亡。阴道和宫颈裂伤导致的产妇发病率为4%。75%的婴儿1分钟时阿氏评分大于7分,97%的婴儿5分钟时评分大于7分。胎儿发病率极低,头颅血肿发生率为6%,仅出现两例严重的胎儿颅内出血。与其他作者报道的使用金属杯吸引器的发病率相比,合理使用小林硅橡胶杯真空吸引器可能会减少胎儿头皮创伤。

相似文献

1
Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.小林真空吸引器的临床评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 1984 Sep;64(3):431-5.
2
Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.硅橡胶产科吸引杯分娩队列研究:I. 器械安全性
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Oct;66(4):503-9.
3
Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.硅橡胶产科吸引杯分娩的队列研究:II. 真空吸引失败。
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;68(5):662-6.
4
Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Nov;66(5):624-8.
5
Fetal cranial injuries related to delivery with the Malmström vacuum extractor.与使用马尔姆斯特伦真空吸引器分娩相关的胎儿颅脑损伤。
Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Jun;53(6):750-7.
6
Clinical experience with the Silc Cup Vacuum Extractor.Silc杯真空吸引器的临床经验。
Singapore Med J. 1993 Apr;34(2):135-8.
7
Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.传统马尔姆斯特伦拔牙器与带硅橡胶杯的新型拔牙器的比较。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(7):791-2. doi: 10.3109/00016348609161502.
8
The use of the vacuum extractor.
Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1982 Dec;9(3):641-61.
9
Maternal and neonatal morbidity in instrumental deliveries with the Kobayashi vacuum extractor and low forceps.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(7):643-7. doi: 10.3109/00016348709022072.
10
Vacuum extractor: a safe instrument?真空吸引器:一种安全的器械?
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Aug;26(3):177-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01561.x.