Suppr超能文献

卡替卡因与丙胺卡因用于硬膜外麻醉的比较研究。

A comparative study of carticaine and prilocaine in epidural anaesthesia.

作者信息

Eerola R, Eerola M

出版信息

Ann Clin Res. 1978 Apr;10(2):102-4.

PMID:354472
Abstract

Carticaine and prilocaine (without adrenaline) in epidural anaesthesia were compared in a double blind study. Carticaine and prilocaine were used in 2 % concentration without adrenaline. The latency time was not significantly different, but carticaine was a shorter acting local anaesthetic. The motor block in both series was similar. Carticaine is a good and reliable analgesic in short operations but in operations longer than one and a half hours catheter technique, adrenaline addition or local anaesthetics of longer duration ought to be used.

摘要

在一项双盲研究中比较了卡替卡因和丙胺卡因(不含肾上腺素)用于硬膜外麻醉的情况。卡替卡因和丙胺卡因均以2%的浓度使用且不含肾上腺素。潜伏期无显著差异,但卡替卡因是作用时间较短的局部麻醉药。两组的运动阻滞相似。卡替卡因在短时间手术中是一种良好且可靠的镇痛药,但在超过一个半小时的手术中,应采用导管技术、添加肾上腺素或使用作用时间更长的局部麻醉药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验