Suppr超能文献

新冠焦虑及社区风险因素对保持社交距离行为的作用

Role of COVID-19 Anxiety and Community Risk Factors on Physical Distancing Practice.

作者信息

Wang Hsin-Yi, Cheng Cecilia

机构信息

Social and Health Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(4):110. doi: 10.3390/bs12040110.

Abstract

Existing studies have focused primarily on self-oriented anxiety (i.e., anxiety over one's infection) in the pandemic context, and the role of community risk is largely ignored. This study addressed these gaps by examining (a) self-oriented anxiety and two forms of others-oriented anxiety (i.e., anxiety concerning others' health and societal problems), (b) the associations between all these forms of anxiety and physical distancing practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, and (c) the hypothesized moderating role of community risk factors. The participants were 703 U.S. community-dwelling adults who completed an online survey. Geo-identifier data were extracted to identify the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases and four social vulnerability indexes for the county in which each participant resided. Both forms of others-oriented anxiety were positively associated with physical distancing adoption, and the association was stronger among the participants residing in lower-risk communities (i.e., fewer confirmed COVID-19 cases, higher socioeconomic status, and better housing conditions). The study's novel findings reveal the protective role of anxiety, particularly anxiety concerning others' well-being, in encouraging people to adopt physical distancing during a pandemic. However, the protective role of anxiety is contingent upon certain community risk factors. Anxiety is more beneficial to residents of low- rather than high-risk communities.

摘要

现有研究主要聚焦于大流行背景下的自我导向焦虑(即对自身感染的焦虑),而社区风险的作用在很大程度上被忽视了。本研究通过考察以下内容填补了这些空白:(a)自我导向焦虑和两种形式的他人导向焦虑(即对他人健康和社会问题的焦虑);(b)在新冠疫情期间,所有这些焦虑形式与保持社交距离行为之间的关联;(c)社区风险因素的假设性调节作用。参与者为703名居住在美国社区的成年人,他们完成了一项在线调查。提取地理标识数据以确定每个参与者居住县的新冠确诊病例数和四个社会脆弱性指数。两种形式的他人导向焦虑均与采取社交距离呈正相关,且这种关联在居住在低风险社区(即新冠确诊病例较少、社会经济地位较高和住房条件较好)的参与者中更强。该研究的新发现揭示了焦虑,尤其是对他人福祉的焦虑,在鼓励人们在大流行期间采取社交距离方面的保护作用。然而,焦虑的保护作用取决于某些社区风险因素。焦虑对低风险社区居民比对高风险社区居民更有益。

相似文献

1
Role of COVID-19 Anxiety and Community Risk Factors on Physical Distancing Practice.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(4):110. doi: 10.3390/bs12040110.
2
Letter to the Editor: THE IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS.
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021 Fall;32(3):219-221. doi: 10.5080/u26175.
4
The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Greek population: Suicidal ideation during the first and second lockdown.
Psychiatriki. 2021 Dec 20;32(4):267-270. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.041. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
5
Social alignment matters: Following pandemic guidelines is associated with better wellbeing.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 3;22(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13130-y.
6
The psychological impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the general population of Saudi Arabia.
Compr Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;102:152192. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152192. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
7
Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak in Urban Settings in China.
J Urban Health. 2021 Feb;98(1):41-52. doi: 10.1007/s11524-020-00498-8. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
9
Facilitators and barriers to social distancing for young people during the COVID-19 pandemic.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 4;22(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13325-3.
10
Reactions to COVID-19: Differential predictors of distress, avoidance, and disregard for social distancing.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:94-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Is Social Media a New Type of Social Support? Social Media Use in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 26;19(7):3952. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19073952.
2
Public Emotional and Coping Responses to the COVID-19 Infodemic: A Review and Recommendations.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 14;12:755938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.755938. eCollection 2021.
3
Fear of COVID-19 contagion and consumption: Evidence from a survey of Italian households.
Health Econ. 2022 Mar;31(3):496-507. doi: 10.1002/hec.4464. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Diagnostics for COVID-19: moving from pandemic response to control.
Lancet. 2022 Feb 19;399(10326):757-768. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02346-1. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
5
Effective COVID-19 Control: A Comparative Analysis of the Stringency and Timeliness of Government Responses in Asia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 17;18(16):8686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168686.
7
Teleworking in Times of COVID-19: Effects on the Acquisition of Personal Resources.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:685275. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685275. eCollection 2021.
8
Scaling Up Global Mental Health Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Feb 1;73(2):231-234. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000774. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
9
Mental health issues and health disparities amid COVID-19 outbreak in China: Comparison of residents inside and outside the epicenter.
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Sep;303:114070. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114070. Epub 2021 Jun 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验