Suppr超能文献

一项关于新冠疫情第一波期间宗教应对维度与心理症状之间关联的荟萃分析综述。

A meta-analytic review of the associations between dimensions of religious coping and psychological symptoms during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Cheng Cecilia, Ying Weijun

机构信息

Social and Health Psychology Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Department of Education, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 19;14:1097598. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1097598. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, the unknown etiology and treatment of the highly transmissible coronavirus posed considerable threats to public mental health. Many people around the globe turned to religion as an attempt to mitigate their heightened psychological distress, but mixed findings have been obtained regarding the association between the use of religious coping and two psychological symptoms-anxiety and depressive symptoms-widely reported in the initial wave.

OBJECTIVE

The present meta-analysis was conducted to resolve the empirical inconsistency by synthesizing this body of studies and identifying both individual and national-level factors that accounted for the inconsistent findings.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, the literature search and data screening procedures yielded 42 eligible studies, with 25,438 participants (58% females, average age = 36.50 years) from 24 countries spanning seven world regions.

RESULTS

Overall, the results showed that only negative religious coping was positively associated with psychological symptoms ( = 0.2886, < 0.0001). Although the associations of both general and positive religious coping with psychological symptoms were non-significant (s = 0.0425 and -0.0240, s > 0.39), the moderation analysis revealed significant positive associations between positive religious coping and psychological symptoms in two demographic groups who experienced greater pandemic distress than their counterparts: younger participants and female participants.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis provides a nuanced understanding of the complex nature of religious coping in the initial wave of the COVID-19 pandemic when the levels of public anxiety and stress were heightened. The exclusive use of religious coping may not be associated with low levels of psychological symptoms, implying the importance of supplementing the deployment of this strategy with an array of other strategies. Therapists of mental health interventions should show their clients how to make good use of positive religious coping together with other strategies, and how to avoid the use of negative religious coping, to handle their psychological problems.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://osf.io/shb32/.

摘要

引言

在新冠疫情的第一波冲击中,这种高传染性冠状病毒的病因不明且缺乏有效治疗方法,对公众心理健康构成了相当大的威胁。全球许多人转向宗教,试图缓解他们日益加剧的心理困扰,但关于宗教应对方式与在疫情第一波中广泛报道的两种心理症状——焦虑和抑郁症状——之间的关联,研究结果并不一致。

目的

本荟萃分析旨在通过综合这一系列研究,并识别导致研究结果不一致的个体和国家层面的因素,来解决实证研究中的矛盾。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,文献检索和数据筛选程序共纳入42项符合条件的研究,涉及来自世界七个地区24个国家的25438名参与者(58%为女性,平均年龄 = 36.50岁)。

结果

总体而言,结果显示只有消极宗教应对方式与心理症状呈正相关( = 0.2886, < 0.0001)。虽然一般宗教应对方式和积极宗教应对方式与心理症状的关联均不显著(分别为 = 0.0425和 -0.0240, > 0.39),但调节分析显示,在经历了比同龄人更大疫情困扰的两个人口统计学群体中,积极宗教应对方式与心理症状之间存在显著正相关:年轻参与者和女性参与者。

讨论

本荟萃分析对新冠疫情第一波期间公众焦虑和压力加剧时宗教应对的复杂性质提供了细致入微的理解。单纯使用宗教应对方式可能与低水平心理症状无关,这意味着用一系列其他策略补充这一应对策略的重要性。心理健康干预治疗师应向其客户展示如何将积极宗教应对方式与其他策略结合使用,以及如何避免使用消极宗教应对方式来处理心理问题。

系统评价注册

https://osf.io/shb32/

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d7e1/9894651/f98e9e580e0e/fpsyt-14-1097598-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验