Department of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, London, UK.
Institute of Cognitive & Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 3;22(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13130-y.
In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, most countries implemented physical distancing measures. Many mental health experts warned that through increasing social isolation and anxiety, these measures could negatively affect psychosocial wellbeing. However, socially aligning with others by adhering to these measures may also be beneficial for wellbeing.
We examined these two contrasting hypotheses using cross-national survey data (N = 6675) collected fortnightly from participants in 115 countries over 3 months at the beginning of the pandemic. Participants reported their wellbeing, perceptions of how vulnerable they were to Covid-19 (i.e., high risk of infection) and how much they, and others in their social circle and country, were adhering to the distancing measures.
Linear mixed-effects models showed that being a woman, having lower educational attainment, living alone and perceived high vulnerability to Covid-19 were risk factors for poorer wellbeing. Being young (18-25) was associated with lower wellbeing, but longitudinal analyses showed that young people's wellbeing improved over 3 months. In contrast to widespread views that physical distancing measures negatively affect wellbeing, results showed that following the guidelines was positively associated with wellbeing even for people in high-risk groups.
These findings provide an important counterpart to the idea that pandemic containment measures such as physical distancing negatively impacted wellbeing unequivocally. Despite the overall burden of the pandemic on psychosocial wellbeing, social alignment with others can still contribute to positive wellbeing. The pandemic has manifested our propensity to adapt to challenges, particularly highlighting how social alignment can forge resilience.
为应对新冠疫情,大多数国家都采取了保持社交距离的措施。许多心理健康专家警告称,这些措施可能会通过增加社会隔离和焦虑,对社会心理福祉产生负面影响。然而,通过遵守这些措施与他人保持一致,也可能有益于福祉。
我们使用在疫情开始时三个月内,从 115 个国家的 6675 名参与者中每两周收集一次的跨国调查数据,检验了这两个相互矛盾的假设。参与者报告了他们的幸福感,以及他们对自己感染新冠病毒风险(即感染风险高)的感知,还有他们自己和他们社交圈和国家中的其他人遵守距离措施的程度。
线性混合效应模型显示,女性、受教育程度较低、独居以及感知到感染新冠病毒的高风险是幸福感较差的风险因素。年轻人(18-25 岁)的幸福感较低,但纵向分析显示,年轻人的幸福感在三个月内有所提高。与普遍认为保持社交距离措施会对幸福感产生负面影响的观点相反,结果表明,即使对于高风险人群,遵循指导方针也与幸福感呈正相关。
这些发现为这样一种观点提供了重要的佐证,即新冠疫情防控措施,如保持社交距离,对幸福感产生负面影响是明确的。尽管疫情对社会心理福祉造成了总体负担,但与他人保持一致仍然可以促进幸福感。疫情突显了我们适应挑战的倾向,特别是强调了社会一致性如何能够培养韧性。