Gaile Mara, Papia Evaggelia, Zalite Vita, Locs Janis, Soboleva Una
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Riga Stradins University, LV-1007 Riga, Latvia.
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, 205 06 Malmö, Sweden.
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;10(4):55. doi: 10.3390/dj10040055.
The objective was to compare marginal defects and evaluate discoloration for adhesively cemented veneers in vitro when using two cement removal techniques. Twenty premolars were prepared with chamfer and borders in enamel. IPS e.max CAD veneers were cemented using Panavia V5 and divided in two groups ( = 10): cement excess removed with a probe after tack-curing for 3-5 s, or cement excess removed with a brush, then completely polymerized. All teeth were stored in alginate gel until micro-CT examination. Scanning was performed twice: directly after cementation and after thermocycling (5000 cycles, between 5 and 55 °C). To analyze discoloration, teeth were colored using 0.5% basic fuchsine and examined under a stereomicroscope. Depth of dye infiltration was scored 0 (no discoloration) to 5 (discoloration along the entire margin). Statistically significant differences of cement defects before thermocycling were reported, where brushing showed more defects than probing ( = 0.0161). After thermocycling, the defects increased for both groups. Extensive discoloration was the most common (55.56%) when removing excess by probing; by brushing, 90% of the specimens exhibited slight discoloration ( = 0.008). Regression analysis showed no relationship between type of defect and degree of discoloration. Removing cement with a brush causes more marginal defects, however less discoloration after thermocycling.
目的是比较在体外使用两种去除粘固剂技术时,粘结式全瓷贴面的边缘缺陷并评估变色情况。对20颗前磨牙进行预备,在釉质上制备出肩台和边缘。使用Panavia V5粘结IPS e.max CAD全瓷贴面,并将其分为两组(每组n = 10):在初步固化3 - 5秒后用探针去除多余的粘固剂,或用刷子去除多余的粘固剂,然后完全聚合。所有牙齿均保存在藻酸盐凝胶中直至进行显微CT检查。扫描进行两次:粘结后立即扫描以及热循环(5000次循环,温度在5至55°C之间)后扫描。为了分析变色情况,用0.5%碱性品红对牙齿进行染色,并在体视显微镜下检查。染料渗透深度评分从0(无变色)到5(沿整个边缘变色)。报告了热循环前粘固剂缺陷的统计学显著差异,其中用刷子去除显示的缺陷比用探针去除更多(P = 0.0161)。热循环后,两组的缺陷都增加了。用探针去除多余粘固剂时,广泛变色最为常见(55.56%);用刷子去除时,90%的标本表现出轻微变色(P = 0.008)。回归分析表明缺陷类型与变色程度之间没有关系。用刷子去除粘固剂会导致更多的边缘缺陷,然而热循环后变色较少。