Ding Lei, Weng Sixian, Zhang Hongda, Yu Fengyuan, Qi Yingjie, Zhang Shu, Tang Min
Department of Cardiology, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, China.
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2022 Mar 22;9(4):91. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9040091.
(1) Background: The panoramic view of a novel wide-band dielectric mapping system could show the individual anatomy. We aimed to compare the feasibility, efficacy and safety of the panoramic view guided approach for ablation of AVNRT with the conventional approach. (2) Methods: Ablation distributions in eight patients were retrospectively analyzed using the panoramic view. The para-slow-pathway (para-SP) region was divided into three regions, and the region that most frequently appeared with the appropriate junctional rhythm or eliminated the slow-pathway was defined as the adaptive slow-pathway (aSP) region. Twenty patients with AVNRT were then ablated in the aSP region under the panoramic view and compared with 40 patients using the conventional approach. (3) Results: Thirty ablation points were analyzed. The majority of effective points (95.0%) were located in the inferior and anterior portions of the para-SP region and defined as the aSP region. Baseline characteristics, fluoroscopic duration, and mean number of ablations were similar among the two groups. The panoramic view group had a significantly higher percentage of appropriate junctional rhythm (81.9% ± 26.0% vs. 55.7% ± 30.5%, = 0.002) than the conventional group. (4) Conclusions: The use of the panoramic view for AVNRT ablation achieved similar clinical endpoints with higher ablation efficiency than the conventional approach.
(1) 背景:新型宽带介电标测系统的全景视图可显示个体解剖结构。我们旨在比较房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)消融的全景视图引导方法与传统方法的可行性、有效性和安全性。(2) 方法:回顾性分析8例患者使用全景视图的消融分布情况。将旁道区域分为三个区域,将出现适当交界性心律或消除慢径最频繁的区域定义为适应性慢径(aSP)区域。然后在全景视图下对20例AVNRT患者在aSP区域进行消融,并与40例使用传统方法的患者进行比较。(3) 结果:分析了30个消融点。大多数有效点(95.0%)位于旁道区域的下部和前部,并被定义为aSP区域。两组患者的基线特征、透视时间和平均消融次数相似。全景视图组的适当交界性心律百分比显著高于传统组(81.9%±26.0%对55.7%±30.5%,P = 0.002)。(4) 结论:使用全景视图进行AVNRT消融与传统方法相比,在临床终点相似的情况下,消融效率更高。