Zhou Zhengzhong, Zhang Bin, Wang Qian, Meng Xiaoshan, Wu Qigang, Zheng Tao, Huhe Taoli
National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Institute of Urban and Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China.
Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 2 Neng Yuan Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Membranes (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;12(4):377. doi: 10.3390/membranes12040377.
Multi-stage A/O-MBR processes were designed to improve wastewater treatment efficiency; three different designs were carried out and compared in this study. The 2(A/O)-MBR process, i.e., with two sets of anoxic/oxic tanks in series, showed better effluent quality than A/O-MBR and 3(A/O)-MBR processes. The removal rates of COD, NH4+-N, TP and TN were 95.29%, 89.47%, 83.55% and 78.58%, respectively, complying satisfactorily with China's urban sewage treatment plant pollutant discharge standards. In terms of membrane fouling, the 3(A/O)-MBR process demonstrated the lowest fouling propensity. The microbial community structure in each bioreaction tank was analyzed, the results from which matched with the process efficiency and fouling behavior.
设计了多级A/O-MBR工艺以提高废水处理效率;本研究进行了三种不同设计并进行比较。2(A/O)-MBR工艺,即串联两组缺氧/好氧池,其出水水质优于A/O-MBR和3(A/O)-MBR工艺。COD、NH4+-N、TP和TN的去除率分别为95.29%、89.47%、83.55%和78.58%,令人满意地符合中国城镇污水处理厂污染物排放标准。在膜污染方面,3(A/O)-MBR工艺表现出最低的污染倾向。分析了每个生物反应池中的微生物群落结构,其结果与工艺效率和污染行为相匹配。