Revilla-León Marta, Alonso Pérez-Barquero Jorge, Zubizarreta-Macho Álvaro, Barmak Abdul B, Att Wael, Kois John C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Kois Center, Seattle, WA.
J Prosthodont. 2023 Mar;32(3):253-258. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13526. Epub 2022 May 2.
To assess the influence of the number of teeth (2, 3, or 4) and location (molars, molar and premolar, or premolars and canines) of the bilateral virtual occlusal record on the accuracy of the virtual maxillo-mandibular relationship acquired by an intraoral scanner (IOS).
Diagnostic casts mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator were obtained. Four markers were adhered on the facial surfaces of the first molars and canines. The mounted casts were digitized using an extraoral scanner. Maxillary and mandibular intraoral digital scans were obtained using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 4). The maxillary and mandibular digital scans were duplicated 105 times and divided into 7 groups based on the number of teeth (2, 3, or 4) and location (molar, molar and premolar, or premolars and canines) of the bilateral virtual occlusal records (n = 15). The alignment of the scans was automatically performed after the acquisition of the corresponding occlusal records by the IOS program. Eight linear distances between the gauge balls were computed on the reference scan and on the 105 digital scans. The distances obtained on the reference scan were used to calculate the discrepancies with the distances obtained on each experimental scan. The Shapiro-Wilk test showed that the data was normally distributed. The trueness and precision data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA followed by pairwise comparison Tukey tests (α = 0.05).
Two-way ANOVA showed that the number of teeth (p < 0.001) and the position of the virtual occlusal record (p < 0.001) were significant factors on the accuracy of the maxillo-mandibular relationship. Tukey test showed significant overall mean differences between the different groups tested: the 4-teeth group obtained the highest trueness, and the 2-teeth group showed the lowest trueness values (p < 0.001). Tukey test showed significant trueness differences between the virtual occlusal record locations. The 2-teeth record located more posteriorly obtained the lowest trueness. Significant differences in precision values were found among the subgroups tested (p < 0.001). The 2-teeth group obtained significantly more precision values than the 3- and 4-teeth groups. Additionally, there was a significant difference in precision values between the subgroup tested in which the first molar and second premolar location had the highest precision, while the first and second premolar's location obtained the lowest precision.
The number of teeth and the location of the bilateral virtual occlusal record influenced the accuracy of the virtual maxillo-mandibular relationship obtained by the intraoral scanner tested. The more teeth included in the bilateral virtual occlusal record, the higher the accuracy of the maxillo-mandibular relationship. Additionally, the more anteriorly located the virtual bilateral occlusal record involving 2 or 3 teeth was, the higher the accuracy mean value.
评估双侧虚拟咬合记录的牙齿数量(2颗、3颗或4颗)和位置(磨牙、磨牙和前磨牙,或前磨牙和尖牙)对口腔内扫描仪(IOS)获取的虚拟上颌-下颌关系准确性的影响。
获取安装在半可调式牙合架上的诊断模型。在第一磨牙和尖牙的颊面粘贴四个标记。使用口外扫描仪对安装好的模型进行数字化处理。使用口腔内扫描仪(TRIOS 4)获取上颌和下颌的口腔内数字扫描图像。将上颌和下颌数字扫描图像复制105次,并根据双侧虚拟咬合记录的牙齿数量(2颗、3颗或4颗)和位置(磨牙、磨牙和前磨牙,或前磨牙和尖牙)分为7组(n = 15)。在IOS程序获取相应咬合记录后,自动进行扫描对齐。在参考扫描图像和105张数字扫描图像上计算量球之间的八个线性距离。将参考扫描图像上获得的距离用于计算与每个实验扫描图像上获得的距离的差异。Shapiro-Wilk检验表明数据呈正态分布。使用双向方差分析,随后进行两两比较的Tukey检验(α = 0.05)分析准确性和精密度数据。
双向方差分析表明,牙齿数量(p < 0.001)和虚拟咬合记录的位置(p < 0.001)是影响上颌-下颌关系准确性的重要因素。Tukey检验表明,所测试的不同组之间总体平均差异显著:4颗牙组的准确性最高,2颗牙组的准确性值最低(p < 0.001)。Tukey检验表明,虚拟咬合记录位置之间的准确性存在显著差异。位于更后方的2颗牙记录的准确性最低。在所测试的亚组中,精密度值存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。2颗牙组获得的精密度值显著高于3颗牙组和4颗牙组。此外,在测试的亚组中,第一磨牙和第二前磨牙位置获得的精密度最高,而第一和第二前磨牙位置获得的精密度最低,两者之间的精密度值存在显著差异。
牙齿数量和双侧虚拟咬合记录的位置影响了所测试的口腔内扫描仪获得的虚拟上颌-下颌关系的准确性。双侧虚拟咬合记录中包含的牙齿越多,上颌-下颌关系的准确性越高。此外,涉及2颗或3颗牙的虚拟双侧咬合记录位置越靠前,准确性平均值越高。