Division of Pharmacy and Optometry, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, M13 9PT, Manchester, UK.
School of Medicine, Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, CM1 1SQ, Chelmsford, UK.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Aug;44(4):930-938. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01403-w. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
Many countries, including the United Kingdom, have established Emergency Department (ED) pharmacy services where some ED pharmacists now work as practitioners. They provide both traditional pharmaceutical care and novel practitioner care i.e. clinical examination, yet their impact on quality of care is unknown.
To develop a framework of structures, processes and potential outcome indicators to support evaluation of the quality of ED pharmacy services in future studies.
Framework components (structures, processes and potential outcome indicators) were identified in three ways: from a narrative review of relevant international literature, and separate panel meetings with ED pharmacists and then other ED healthcare professionals. Structures and processes were collated into categories developed iteratively throughout data collection, with outcome indicators collated into six domains of quality as proposed by the Institute of Medicine. These raw data were then processed e.g. outcome indicators screened for clarity i.e. those which explicitly stated what would be measured were included in the framework.
A total of 190 structures, 533 processes, and 503 outcome indicators were identified. Through data processing a total of 153 outcome indicators were included in the final framework divided into the domains safe (32), effective (50), patient centred (18), timely (24), efficient (20) and equitable (9).
The first framework specific to the quality evaluation ED pharmacy services, service evaluators should validate potential outcome indicators prior to their use. The minimum expected of a high-quality service should also be defined to enable interpretation of relevant measurements.
包括英国在内的许多国家都设立了急诊药房服务,一些急诊药师现在以从业者的身份在那里工作。他们提供传统的药学服务和新型从业者服务,即临床检查,但他们对护理质量的影响尚不清楚。
制定一个框架,以支持未来研究中评估急诊药房服务质量的结构、流程和潜在结果指标。
通过三种方式确定框架组件(结构、流程和潜在结果指标):对相关国际文献的叙述性综述,以及与急诊药师和其他急诊医疗保健专业人员分别举行的小组会议。结构和流程被分类到在整个数据收集过程中反复开发的类别中,结果指标被分类到医学研究所提出的六个质量领域中。这些原始数据随后进行处理,例如,结果指标的筛选是为了明确说明,即明确说明要测量的内容的指标被包括在框架中。
共确定了 190 个结构、533 个流程和 503 个结果指标。通过数据处理,最终框架共包括 153 个结果指标,分为安全(32 个)、有效(50 个)、以患者为中心(18 个)、及时(24 个)、高效(20 个)和公平(9 个)领域。
这是第一个专门针对急诊药房服务质量评估的框架,服务评估人员应在使用前验证潜在的结果指标。还应定义高质量服务的最低预期,以能够解释相关测量结果。