Basam Lakshman Chowdary, Singaraju Gowri Sankar, Obili Sobitha, Keerthipati Thejasree, Basam Ram Chowdary, Prasad Mandava
Department of Orthodontics, Sibar Institute of Dental Sciences, Takkellapadu, Guntur, India.
Department of Orthodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2022 Apr;22(2):107-116. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.2.107. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
Pain during fixed orthodontic treatment can have a detrimental effect on patient treatment compliance. To overcome this, there is a definite need to establish the best pain-relieving methods suitable for orthodontic patients in terms of efficacy and use. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of chewing gum and pre-emptive tenoxicam on pain after initial archwire placement and to evaluate the pain perceptions of orthodontic patients in the two groups while performing various functions at specific time intervals.
Forty-two patients were selected and randomly divided into two groups: group A (chewing gum) and group B (pre-emptive tenoxicam). Pain perception was documented by patients immediately; at 4 h; at bedtime on the day of archwire placement; the next morning; at 24 h; and at bedtime on the 2nd, 3rd, and 7th day after the initial archwire placement. Pain scores were noted during fitting of the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing using a visual analog scale. The data obtained were subjected to statistical analysis.
Group A showed a significant increase in pain until the next morning while fitting the posterior teeth, biting, and chewing [36.2, 52.0, 33.4, respectively]], followed by a gradual decrease by the 7th day. Group B showed a significant increase in pain at bedtime on biting, with a peak value of 47.5. Pain on chewing, fitting posterior teeth, peaked the morning of the next day (100.0, 45.0). The Freidman test showed a statistically significant difference with a p-value of < 0.01. Higher pain scores were observed while chewing and biting compared with that while fitting the posterior teeth in both groups. The overall comparison of pain control between the two groups was not statistically significant [P > 0.05] between the two groups.
Chewing gum was not inferior to pre-emptive tenoxicam. Thus, chewing gum is a non-pharmacological alternative to analgesics for orthodontic pain control that eliminates the chance of adverse reactions and can be used in the absence of adult observation.
固定正畸治疗期间的疼痛会对患者的治疗依从性产生不利影响。为克服这一问题,明确需要在疗效和使用方面确定最适合正畸患者的止痛方法。本研究的目的是比较口香糖和预防性使用替诺昔康对初次放置弓丝后疼痛的影响,并评估两组正畸患者在特定时间间隔执行各种功能时的疼痛感受。
选取42例患者并随机分为两组:A组(口香糖组)和B组(预防性使用替诺昔康组)。患者立即记录疼痛感受;在4小时时记录;在弓丝放置当天的就寝时间记录;第二天早晨记录;在24小时时记录;以及在初次放置弓丝后的第2天、第3天和第7天的就寝时间记录。使用视觉模拟量表记录在后牙贴合、咬合和咀嚼时的疼痛评分。对获得的数据进行统计分析。
A组在贴合后牙、咬合和咀嚼时疼痛显著增加,直至第二天早晨[分别为36.2、52.0、33.4],随后到第7天逐渐减轻。B组在咬合时就寝时间疼痛显著增加,峰值为47.5。咀嚼和贴合后牙时的疼痛在第二天早晨达到峰值(100.0、45.0)。Friedman检验显示差异有统计学意义,p值<0.01。两组在咀嚼和咬合时的疼痛评分均高于贴合后牙时。两组之间疼痛控制的总体比较无统计学意义[P>0.05]。
口香糖并不逊于预防性使用替诺昔康。因此,口香糖是用于正畸疼痛控制的镇痛药的非药物替代品,可消除不良反应的可能性,并且可以在无成人观察的情况下使用。