Waitematā District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):473-478. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13073. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
As people age, they are more likely to require support to maintain activities of daily living. Referral for formal assessment of need (assessed using the 'international Resident Assessment Instrument' [interRAI]) is the first step to access publicly funded services in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). It is unclear whether ethnic access inequities present in other areas of the NZ health system occur in this referral process. This exploratory research aimed to explore ethnic variation in referrals for interRAI assessment, and associated factors.
A retrospective cohort study of all new referrals for aged care services for those 55-plus, received in 2018 by Waitematā District Health Board (WDHB), was conducted. The primary outcome was referral outcome (assessment and no assessment). Secondary outcomes included time from referral to assessment, reason for referral, mortality and, in the assessed cohort, assessment outcome.
New referrals (n = 3263) were ethnically representative of the general older adult population in WDHB. Māori were younger and more likely to be referred for higher-level care needs than non-Māori, non-Pasifika (NMNP) (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in referral outcome, time to assessment or mortality between ethnicities. NMNP were more likely to access lower-level care services than Māori or Pasifika older adults (p = 0.002).
Ethnicity was not associated with aged care service assessment access once people were referred for publicly funded services, nor was it associated with time to assessment or mortality in this exploratory study. Māori had higher care needs than NMNP at the time of referral.
随着人们年龄的增长,他们更有可能需要支持来维持日常生活活动。在奥塔哥新西兰(NZ),正式评估需求(使用“国际居民评估工具”[interRAI]进行评估)是获得公共资助服务的第一步。目前尚不清楚在 NZ 卫生系统的其他领域存在的族裔获得服务的不平等现象是否也存在于这一转诊过程中。这项探索性研究旨在探讨 interRAI 评估转诊中存在的族裔差异,以及相关因素。
对 2018 年怀塔克雷区卫生委员会(WDHB)接收的所有 55 岁以上新的老年护理服务转诊进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结果是转诊结果(评估和未评估)。次要结果包括从转诊到评估的时间、转诊原因、死亡率,以及在评估队列中,评估结果。
新转诊(n=3263)在 WDHB 的一般老年人群中具有代表性。毛利人年龄较小,与非毛利人、非太平洋岛民(NMNP)相比,更有可能被转诊为更高水平的护理需求(p=0.03)。在族裔之间,转诊结果、评估时间或死亡率没有显著差异。NMNP 比毛利人或太平洋岛民更有可能获得较低水平的护理服务(p=0.002)。
在这项探索性研究中,一旦人们被转介到公共资助服务中,族裔与获得老年护理服务评估的机会无关,也与评估时间或死亡率无关。在转诊时,毛利人的护理需求高于 NMNP。