• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Referral for publicly funded aged care services in Indigenous populations: An exploratory cohort study of ethnic variation in Aotearoa New Zealand.在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的土著人群中,为获得公共资助的老年护理服务而转诊:一项探索性队列研究,研究种族差异。
Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):473-478. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13073. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Frailty of Māori, Pasifika, and Non-Māori/Non-Pasifika Older People in New Zealand: A National Population Study of Older People Referred for Home Care Services.新西兰毛利人、太平洋岛民和非毛利/非太平洋岛民老年人的虚弱状况:接受家庭护理服务的老年人的全国人口研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021 May 22;76(6):1101-1107. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa265.
3
Adapting an equity-focused implementation process framework with a focus on ethnic health inequities in the Aotearoa New Zealand context.适应一个以公平为重点的实施过程框架,重点关注新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的族裔健康不公平问题。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jan 27;23(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-02087-y.
4
Māori Health Outcomes in Intensive Care Following Cardiac Surgery in Aotearoa New Zealand.新西兰心脏手术后重症监护中的毛利人健康结局。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Jul;31(7):1037-1044. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.11.015. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
5
Trends in deprivation in hospitalisations of Indigenous children and young people in Aotearoa New Zealand.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦(Aotearoa New Zealand)原住民儿童和青年住院治疗中贫困趋势。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Aug;58(8):1345-1351. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15979. Epub 2022 Apr 15.
6
Inequity in dialysis related practices and outcomes in Aotearoa/New Zealand: a Kaupapa Māori analysis.新西兰透析相关实践和结果中的不平等:毛利人本位分析。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Feb 20;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0737-9.
7
Ethnic variation in access to publicly funded care for unintentional injuries in older adults in Aotearoa New Zealand: a retrospective study.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区老年人意外伤害公共资助护理的获取情况中的种族差异:一项回顾性研究。
Inj Prev. 2025 Jan 23;31(1):66-72. doi: 10.1136/ip-2023-045168.
8
Predictive factors for entry to long-term residential care in octogenarian Māori and non-Māori in New Zealand, LiLACS NZ cohort.新西兰 LiLACS NZ 队列研究中 80 岁以上毛利人和非毛利人进入长期居住护理机构的预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09786-z.
9
Examining the impact of COVID-19 on Māori:non-Māori health inequities in Aotearoa, New Zealand: an observational study protocol.考察 COVID-19 对新西兰毛利人:非毛利人健康不平等的影响:一项观察性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e083564. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083564.
10
Adolescents and oral health service utilization in Canterbury, New Zealand: A geospatial cross-sectional study.新西兰坎特伯雷青少年与口腔卫生服务利用情况:一项基于地理空间的横断面研究。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;51(3):388-398. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12858. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining the minimum data set of geriatric assessment at the Iran primary health care referral system: shifting from fragmentation to integration care for older people.确定伊朗初级卫生保健转诊系统老年评估的最小数据集:将老年人的护理从碎片化转变为整合化。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 7;24(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11498-8.
2
Changes in indicators of well-being on moving from home to long-term care for Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand: A retrospective cohort study.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区毛利人从家中搬至长期护理机构后福祉指标的变化:一项回顾性队列研究。
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Dec;43(4):818-827. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13361. Epub 2024 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Social factors influencing utilization of home care in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review.社会因素对社区居住老年人家庭护理利用的影响:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 Feb 27;21(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02069-1.
2
Predictive factors for entry to long-term residential care in octogenarian Māori and non-Māori in New Zealand, LiLACS NZ cohort.新西兰 LiLACS NZ 队列研究中 80 岁以上毛利人和非毛利人进入长期居住护理机构的预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09786-z.
3
Caregiving, ethnicity and gender in Māori and non-Māori New Zealanders of advanced age: Findings from LiLACS NZ Kaiāwhina (Love and Support) study.新西兰高龄毛利人和非毛利人的照护、种族与性别:来自新西兰老年护理纵向老龄化研究(LiLACS NZ Kaiāwhina,爱与支持)的发现
Australas J Ageing. 2020 Mar;39(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12671. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
A systematic review of pharmacist-led medicines review services in New Zealand - is there equity for Māori older adults?新西兰药剂师主导的药物审查服务的系统评价 - 毛利老年人是否享有公平待遇?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2019 Dec;15(12):1383-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Te Wero tonu-the challenge continues: Māori access to medicines 2006/07-2012/13 update.挑战仍在继续:2006/07 - 2012/13年毛利人获取药品情况更新
N Z Med J. 2018 Nov 9;131(1485):27-47.
6
Comprehensive clinical assessment of home-based older persons within New Zealand: an epidemiological profile of a national cross-section.新西兰居家老年人的综合临床评估:全国横断面的流行病学概况
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016 Aug;40(4):349-55. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12525. Epub 2016 May 15.
7
Non-financial barriers to primary health care services for Maori.
J Prim Health Care. 2009 Sep;1(3):240.
8
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
9
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.

在新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的土著人群中,为获得公共资助的老年护理服务而转诊:一项探索性队列研究,研究种族差异。

Referral for publicly funded aged care services in Indigenous populations: An exploratory cohort study of ethnic variation in Aotearoa New Zealand.

机构信息

Waitematā District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.

The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep;41(3):473-478. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13073. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1111/ajag.13073
PMID:35451157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9545992/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As people age, they are more likely to require support to maintain activities of daily living. Referral for formal assessment of need (assessed using the 'international Resident Assessment Instrument' [interRAI]) is the first step to access publicly funded services in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ). It is unclear whether ethnic access inequities present in other areas of the NZ health system occur in this referral process. This exploratory research aimed to explore ethnic variation in referrals for interRAI assessment, and associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all new referrals for aged care services for those 55-plus, received in 2018 by Waitematā District Health Board (WDHB), was conducted. The primary outcome was referral outcome (assessment and no assessment). Secondary outcomes included time from referral to assessment, reason for referral, mortality and, in the assessed cohort, assessment outcome.

RESULTS

New referrals (n = 3263) were ethnically representative of the general older adult population in WDHB. Māori were younger and more likely to be referred for higher-level care needs than non-Māori, non-Pasifika (NMNP) (p = 0.03). There was no significant difference in referral outcome, time to assessment or mortality between ethnicities. NMNP were more likely to access lower-level care services than Māori or Pasifika older adults (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Ethnicity was not associated with aged care service assessment access once people were referred for publicly funded services, nor was it associated with time to assessment or mortality in this exploratory study. Māori had higher care needs than NMNP at the time of referral.

摘要

目的

随着人们年龄的增长,他们更有可能需要支持来维持日常生活活动。在奥塔哥新西兰(NZ),正式评估需求(使用“国际居民评估工具”[interRAI]进行评估)是获得公共资助服务的第一步。目前尚不清楚在 NZ 卫生系统的其他领域存在的族裔获得服务的不平等现象是否也存在于这一转诊过程中。这项探索性研究旨在探讨 interRAI 评估转诊中存在的族裔差异,以及相关因素。

方法

对 2018 年怀塔克雷区卫生委员会(WDHB)接收的所有 55 岁以上新的老年护理服务转诊进行了回顾性队列研究。主要结果是转诊结果(评估和未评估)。次要结果包括从转诊到评估的时间、转诊原因、死亡率,以及在评估队列中,评估结果。

结果

新转诊(n=3263)在 WDHB 的一般老年人群中具有代表性。毛利人年龄较小,与非毛利人、非太平洋岛民(NMNP)相比,更有可能被转诊为更高水平的护理需求(p=0.03)。在族裔之间,转诊结果、评估时间或死亡率没有显著差异。NMNP 比毛利人或太平洋岛民更有可能获得较低水平的护理服务(p=0.002)。

结论

在这项探索性研究中,一旦人们被转介到公共资助服务中,族裔与获得老年护理服务评估的机会无关,也与评估时间或死亡率无关。在转诊时,毛利人的护理需求高于 NMNP。