Radke R, Stach W
Arch Histol Jpn. 1986 Oct;49(4):411-20. doi: 10.1679/aohc.49.411.
The authors investigate whether the islets of Langerhans can actually be regarded as "neuro-paraneuronal control centers of the exocrine pancreas" as was first suggested by Fujita and Kobayashi (1979). The question is discussed on the basis of the authors' electron microscopic findings regarding pancreatic innervation before and after truncular vagotomy. The results do not seem to support the above hypothesis which advocates that the intrainsular axons are principally engaged in the release of their transmitters into the capillaries in order to regulate, via the insuloacinar portal vessels, the exocrine function of the pancreas. On the contrary, the present data draw attention to the unambiguous assignation of intrainsular axons to endocrine cells, a point of question in line with several findings published in the literature including papers by the first supporters of this hypothesis. No change was observed in the innervation pattern of the effector cells after vagotomy.
作者们研究了胰岛是否真的能如藤田和小林(1979年)首次提出的那样,被视为“外分泌胰腺的神经-副神经节控制中心”。该问题是基于作者在切断迷走神经干前后关于胰腺神经支配的电子显微镜观察结果进行讨论的。结果似乎并不支持上述假说,该假说主张岛内轴突主要是将其递质释放到毛细血管中,以便通过胰岛腺泡门脉血管调节胰腺的外分泌功能。相反,目前的数据促使人们关注岛内轴突与内分泌细胞的明确关联,这是一个与文献中包括该假说最早支持者的论文在内的若干研究结果相关的有争议点。切断迷走神经后,效应细胞的神经支配模式未观察到变化。