Department of Gastroenterology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangxi, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 11;101(10):e29033. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029033.
Guidelines for the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) recommend that psychological therapies should be considered, but their relative efficacy is unknown. We performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to try to resolve this uncertainty.
Two individual researchers conducted the platform searches on Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus from inception to February 2022. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the data will be performed in STATA13.0 software according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols guidelines. Two authors independently performed the literature searching, data extraction, and quality evaluation. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for randomized controlled trials.
A synthesis of current evidence of psychological interventions for IBS will be provided in this study.
This result will provide a comprehensive analysis and synthesis to inform practitioners and policy makers about the effectiveness of psychological interventions for patients with IBS.
肠易激综合征（IBS）管理指南建议考虑心理治疗，但它们的相对疗效尚不清楚。我们制定了一个系统评价和荟萃分析的方案，试图解决这一不确定性。
两名研究人员分别在 Ovid Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations、Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE、Ovid PsycINFO、Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 和 Scopus 上进行了平台检索，检索时间从建库至 2022 年 2 月。将根据系统评价和荟萃分析报告的首选项目协议指南在 STATA13.0 软件中进行数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。两名作者独立进行文献检索、数据提取和质量评估。使用 Cochrane 随机对照试验偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。
本研究将提供当前心理干预治疗 IBS 的证据综合。
该结果将为从业者和决策者提供全面的分析和综合，以了解心理干预对 IBS 患者的有效性。
