Zhou Shenghui, Liu Xiaoli, Wang Xiaoxia, Xi Fenglin, Luo Xiaoke, Yao Liang, Tang Hao
College of Pharmacy, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.
Department of Pharmacy, Baiyin Central Hospital, Baiyin.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16446. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016446.
The global prevalence of Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is estimated to be as high as 15% and a number of different non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments have been used to manage IBS in clinical practice, which poses great challenges for clinicians to make appropriate decisions. Hence, a systematic review and network meta-analysis on all available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for IBS is needed to provide reliable evidence.
We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Chinese Biomedical medicine (CBM) from inception to 31, May 2019. Randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions for IBS will be included. Study quality will be assessed on the basis of the methodology and categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. Primary outcomes are global or clinical improvement and quality of life. A Bayesian network meta-analysis would be performed, and relative ranking of agents would be assessed. A node splitting method will be used to examine the inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons when a loop connecting 3 arms exists.
Researchers will rank the effectiveness and safety of the potentials interventions for IBS according the characteristics of patients by conducting an advanced network meta-analysis based on Bayesian statistical model, and interpret the results by using GRADE approach.
The conclusion of our study will provide updated evidence to rank the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for IBS.
Ethical approval is not applicable since this study is a network meta-analysis based on published trials.
CRD42018083844.
据估计,全球肠易激综合征(IBS)的患病率高达15%,在临床实践中,已采用多种不同的非药物和药物治疗方法来管理IBS,这给临床医生做出恰当决策带来了巨大挑战。因此,需要对所有可用的IBS药物和非药物治疗进行系统评价和网状Meta分析,以提供可靠的证据。
我们将检索Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、Cochrane炎症性肠病组专业试验注册库、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM),检索时间从各数据库建库至2019年5月31日。纳入IBS药物和非药物干预的随机对照试验。将根据Cochrane协作手册中描述的方法和类别评估研究质量。主要结局为整体或临床改善以及生活质量。将进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析,并评估各药物的相对排名。当存在连接3个组的环时,将使用节点拆分方法检查直接比较和间接比较之间的不一致性。
研究人员将通过基于贝叶斯统计模型进行先进的网状Meta分析,根据患者特征对IBS潜在干预措施的有效性和安全性进行排名,并使用GRADE方法解释结果。
我们研究的结论将为IBS药物和非药物干预的有效性和安全性排名提供最新证据。
由于本研究是基于已发表试验的网状Meta分析,因此无需伦理批准。
CRD42018083844。