Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Dec;112(12):1715-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02020-3. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Patients with Brugada syndrome (BrS) may experience recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Catheter ablation is becoming an emerging paradigm for treatment of BrS.
To assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in BrS in an updated systematic review.
We comprehensively searched the databases of Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to 11th of August 2021.
Fifty-six studies involving 388 patients were included. A substrate-based strategy was used in 338 cases (87%), and a strategy of targeting premature ventricular complex (PVCs)/ventricular tachycardias (VTs) that triggered ventricular fibrillation (VF) in 47 cases (12%), with combined abnormal electrogram and PVC/VT ablation in 3 cases (1%). Sodium channel blocker was frequently used to augment the arrhythmogenic substrate in 309/388 cases (80%), which included a variety of agents, of which ajmaline was most commonly used. After ablation procedure, the pooled incidence of non-inducibility of VA was 87.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73.4-94.3; I = 51%), and acute resolution of type I ECG was seen in 74.5% (95% CI [52.3-88.6]; I = 75%). Over a weighted mean follow up of 28 months, 7.6% (95% CI [2.1-24]; I = 67%) had recurrence of type I ECG either spontaneously or with drug challenge and 17.6% (95% CI [10.2-28.6]; I = 60%) had recurrence of VA.
Catheter ablation appears to be an efficacious strategy for elimination of arrhythmias or substrate associated with BrS. Further study is needed to identify which patients stand to benefit, and optimal provocation protocol for identifying ablation targets.
Brugada 综合征(BrS)患者可能会出现反复性室性心律失常(VA)。导管消融术正成为治疗 BrS 的新兴范例。
通过系统评价来评估导管消融术在 BrS 中的疗效和安全性。
我们全面检索了 Pubmed/Medline、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库的数据库,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 8 月 11 日。
共纳入 56 项研究,涉及 388 例患者。338 例(87%)采用基于基质的策略,47 例(12%)采用针对触发心室颤动(VF)的室性早搏(PVC)/室性心动过速(VT)的策略,3 例(1%)采用联合异常电描记图和 PVC/VT 消融的策略。309/388 例(80%)患者经常使用钠通道阻滞剂增强致心律失常基质,其中包括多种药物,其中最常使用的是阿马林。消融术后,VA 不可诱导的总发生率为 87.1%(95%置信区间[CI],73.4-94.3;I=51%),74.5%(95% CI [52.3-88.6];I=75%)的患者出现 I 型心电图的急性缓解。在加权平均随访 28 个月期间,7.6%(95% CI [2.1-24];I=67%)的患者自发性或药物激发后出现 I 型心电图复发,17.6%(95% CI [10.2-28.6];I=60%)的患者出现 VA 复发。
导管消融术似乎是一种消除 BrS 相关心律失常或基质的有效策略。需要进一步研究以确定哪些患者受益,以及识别消融靶点的最佳激发方案。