• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多功能土地管理中的信任与内容:评估农业网络中的土壤功能信息传递。

Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks.

机构信息

Teagasc Crops, Environment and Land Use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

Farming Systems Ecology Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708B, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2022 Jun;69(6):1167-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2
PMID:35451645
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9079025/
Abstract

Growing sustainability demands on land have a high knowledge requirement across multiple scientific domains. Exploring networks can expose opportunities for targeting. Using mixed-methods combining social network analysis (SNA) and surveys, networks for key soil functions in case studies in Germany, Ireland and the Netherlands are explored. We find a diversity of contrasting networks that reflect local conditions, sustainability challenges and governance structure. Farmers were found to occupy a central role in the agri-environmental governance network. A comparison of the SNA and survey results indicate low acceptance of messages from many central actors indicating scope to better harness the network for sustainable land management. The source of the messages was important when it came to the implementation of farm management actions. Two pathways for enhanced farmer uptake of multi-functionality are proposed that have wider application are; to increase trust between farmers and actors that are agents of multi-functional messages and/or to increase the bundling or multi-functionality of messages (mandate) of actors trusted by farmers.

摘要

对土地可持续性的需求不断增长,这需要多学科的专业知识。探索网络可以发现目标定位的机会。本研究采用社会网络分析(SNA)和调查相结合的混合方法,对德国、爱尔兰和荷兰的案例研究中的关键土壤功能网络进行了探讨。我们发现了多样性的对比鲜明的网络,这些网络反映了当地的条件、可持续性挑战和治理结构。研究发现,农民在农业环境治理网络中占据核心地位。SNA 和调查结果的比较表明,许多核心参与者的信息接受程度较低,这表明在可持续土地管理方面,有更大的潜力来利用网络。信息的来源对于实施农场管理措施至关重要。提出了两种可以增强农民对多功能性接受程度的途径,即:增加农民和传递多功能性信息的行为者之间的信任,或者增加农民信任的行为者的信息(授权)的捆绑或多功能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/8394f40c5654/267_2022_1647_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/6e1ee26f015c/267_2022_1647_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/524eb3887774/267_2022_1647_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/6b4128b08195/267_2022_1647_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/263ce615f94c/267_2022_1647_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/d85227f080a6/267_2022_1647_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/8394f40c5654/267_2022_1647_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/6e1ee26f015c/267_2022_1647_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/524eb3887774/267_2022_1647_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/6b4128b08195/267_2022_1647_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/263ce615f94c/267_2022_1647_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/d85227f080a6/267_2022_1647_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b0b3/9079025/8394f40c5654/267_2022_1647_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust Versus Content in Multi-functional Land Management: Assessing Soil Function Messaging in Agricultural Networks.多功能土地管理中的信任与内容:评估农业网络中的土壤功能信息传递。
Environ Manage. 2022 Jun;69(6):1167-1185. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01647-2. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Pathways for governance opportunities: Social network analysis to create targeted and effective policies for agricultural and environmental development.治理机会途径:社会网络分析为农业和环境发展制定有针对性和有效的政策。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 1;325(Pt B):116563. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116563. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
3
Navigating agricultural nonpoint source pollution governance: A social network analysis of best management practices in central Pennsylvania.导航农业面源污染治理:宾夕法尼亚州中部最佳管理实践的社会网络分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303745. eCollection 2024.
4
A multi-method approach for the integrative assessment of soil functions: Application on a coastal mountainous site of the Philippines.一种综合评估土壤功能的多方法研究:以菲律宾沿海山区为例。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110461. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110461. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
5
Combining local knowledge and soil science for integrated soil health assessments in conservation agriculture systems.将地方知识与土壤科学相结合,对保护性农业系统中的土壤健康进行综合评估。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 15;286:112192. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112192. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
6
Exploring the Role of 'Intermediaries' between Non-Operating Landowners and Tenant Farmers in Promoting Conservation on Rented Farmland.探索非经营性土地所有者和承租农户之间的“中间人”在促进租用农田保护方面的作用。
Environ Manage. 2024 Apr;73(4):713-724. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01936-y. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
7
Investigating bottlenecks hampering the adoption of water quality-enhancing practices for sustainable land management in Ireland.调查阻碍爱尔兰可持续土地管理中采用水质改善措施的瓶颈。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118741. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118741. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
8
Have farmers had enough of experts?农民受够专家了吗?
Environ Manage. 2022 Jan;69(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/s00267-021-01546-y. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Governance networks around grasslands with contrasting management history.具有不同管理历史的草原治理网络。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Nov 1;273:111152. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111152. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
10
Are farmers in England equipped to meet the knowledge challenge of sustainable soil management? An analysis of farmer and advisor views.英国农民是否具备应对可持续土壤管理知识挑战的能力?对农民和顾问观点的分析。
J Environ Manage. 2008 Jan;86(1):214-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.036. Epub 2007 Mar 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating agricultural nonpoint source pollution governance: A social network analysis of best management practices in central Pennsylvania.导航农业面源污染治理:宾夕法尼亚州中部最佳管理实践的社会网络分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303745. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: Opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling.农业研究促进发展中多利益相关方平台的社会网络分析:创新与推广的机遇和制约因素
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 6;12(2):e0169634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169634. eCollection 2017.
2
Agri-environmental collaboratives as bridging organisations in landscape management.农业环境合作组织在景观管理中的桥梁作用。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Sep 15;161:375-384. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.07.027. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
3
Agriculture policy. EU agricultural reform fails on biodiversity.
农业政策。欧盟农业改革在生物多样性方面失败了。
Science. 2014 Jun 6;344(6188):1090-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1253425.
4
Network centrality of metro systems.地铁系统的网络中心性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040575. Epub 2012 Jul 6.
5
Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States: a meta-analysis of the adoption literature.为什么美国农民会采用最佳管理实践:对采用文献的元分析。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Apr 15;96(1):17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
6
Public policy, private landholders: perspectives on policy mechanisms for sustainable land management.公共政策、私人土地所有者:关于可持续土地管理政策机制的观点
J Environ Manage. 2007 Dec;85(4):986-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.11.009. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
7
Health by association? Social capital, social theory, and the political economy of public health.因关联而健康?社会资本、社会理论与公共卫生的政治经济学
Int J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug;33(4):650-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh013. Epub 2004 Jul 28.
8
Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks.“小世界”网络的集体动力学
Nature. 1998 Jun 4;393(6684):440-2. doi: 10.1038/30918.
9
The centrality of a graph.图的中心性
Psychometrika. 1966 Dec;31(4):581-603. doi: 10.1007/BF02289527.