• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素治疗坏死性软组织感染的时间:越短越安全。

Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: Shorter is Safe.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;23(5):430-435. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.011. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1089/sur.2022.011
PMID:35451883
Abstract

Early debridement improves outcome in necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI), but there is no consensus on duration of antimicrobial therapy. We recently changed practice to discontinue antibiotic agents early with a goal of 48 hours after adequate source control. We hypothesized that discontinuing antibiotic agents after a short course is safe in the treatment of NSTI. This was a prospective study of patients with NSTI comparing short duration of antibiotic agents to a control population after a change in practice. In 2018 we began discontinuing antibiotic agents within 48 hours of source control (absence of cellulitis and no evidence of active infection). Previously, antibiotic duration was at the discretion of the attending surgeon (generally 7-10 days). Patients were excluded from analysis if they were initially debrided at a referring facility, immune compromised, or died prior to source control. Patient characteristics and outcomes were evaluated. The primary outcome was treatment failure requiring antibiotic agents to be restarted with or without further debridement of infected tissue. Secondary outcomes included the duration of antibiotic therapy after source control. We evaluated 151 patients; 119 admitted between January 1, 2011 and January 31, 2018 (PRE) and 32 admitted after January 31, 2018 (POST). Patients were not statistically different regarding characteristics, admission physiologic variables, and comorbidities. The median duration of antibiotic agents after source control in the PRE group was 180.3 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 100.7-318.8) versus 48 hours (IQR, 32.3-100.8) in the POST group (p < 0.01). Patients in each group were treated as described above, and treatment failure occurred in seven (5.9%) PRE patients and two (6.3%) POST (99.3% post hoc power at non-inferiority limit 20%, significance p < 0.05). Thirty-day all-cause mortality was not different between groups (6.7% vs. 6.3%; p = 0.94). Short-duration (48 hours) antibiotic agents after NSTI source control is as safe and effective as a longer course.

摘要

早期清创可以改善坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的预后,但对于抗菌治疗的持续时间尚无共识。我们最近改变了治疗方法,即通过适当的源头控制,在 48 小时内尽早停止使用抗生素。我们假设,在 NSTI 治疗中,短疗程的抗生素治疗是安全的。这是一项前瞻性研究,比较了 NSTI 患者在治疗方法改变后使用短疗程抗生素与对照组的情况。2018 年,我们开始在源头控制后 48 小时内(无蜂窝织炎且无活动性感染的证据)停止使用抗生素。在此之前,抗生素的持续时间由主治外科医生决定(通常为 7-10 天)。如果患者最初在转诊机构进行清创、免疫功能低下或在源头控制前死亡,则将其排除在分析之外。评估了患者的特征和结局。主要结局是需要重新开始使用抗生素治疗的治疗失败,无论是否对感染组织进行进一步清创。次要结局包括源头控制后抗生素治疗的持续时间。我们评估了 151 名患者;119 名患者于 2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 31 日(PRE)入院,32 名患者于 2018 年 1 月 31 日(POST)后入院。两组患者在特征、入院生理变量和合并症方面无统计学差异。PRE 组中,源头控制后抗生素的中位持续时间为 180.3 小时(IQR,100.7-318.8),而 POST 组为 48 小时(IQR,32.3-100.8)(p<0.01)。两组患者均按照上述方法进行治疗,PRE 组中有 7 例(5.9%)和 POST 组中有 2 例(6.3%)患者治疗失败(非劣效性 20%的事后检验效能为 99.3%,意义 p<0.05)。两组患者 30 天全因死亡率无差异(6.7% vs. 6.3%;p=0.94)。NSTI 源头控制后,短疗程(48 小时)抗生素治疗与长疗程一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: Shorter is Safe.抗生素治疗坏死性软组织感染的时间:越短越安全。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;23(5):430-435. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.011. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Evaluation of Antibiotic Duration after Surgical Debridement of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection.坏死性软组织感染清创术后抗生素疗程评价。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 May;23(4):357-363. doi: 10.1089/sur.2021.256. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
3
A Multi-Center Review of Care Patterns and Outcomes in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.坏死性软组织感染护理模式与结局的多中心回顾
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Dec;17(6):773-778. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.238. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
4
Defining the Optimal Antibiotic Duration in Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Clinical Experience from a Quaternary Referral Center.确定坏死性皮肤和软组织感染的最佳抗生素使用时长:来自四级转诊中心的临床经验
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Oct;24(8):741-748. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.294. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
5
Short Courses of Antibiotics Are Safe in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.抗生素短疗程治疗坏死性软组织感染是安全的。
Am Surg. 2021 Dec;87(10):1666-1671. doi: 10.1177/00031348211051700. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
6
Short Versus Long Antibiotic Duration for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.短疗程与长疗程抗生素治疗坏死性软组织感染的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Jun;24(5):425-432. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.037. Epub 2023 May 24.
7
Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection: Time is Crucial, and the Admitting Service Matters.坏死性软组织感染:时间至关重要,而收治科室也很重要。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;21(10):828-833. doi: 10.1089/sur.2019.262. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
8
Does Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Impact the Outcome for Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Infected With Anaerobic Bacteria?负压伤口疗法是否会影响感染厌氧菌的坏死性软组织感染患者的预后?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024 Apr;25(3):179-184. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.300. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
9
Necrotizing soft tissue infections: improved outcomes with modern care.坏死性软组织感染:现代治疗改善预后。
Am Surg. 2004 Oct;70(10):841-4.
10
Estimating the Impact of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections in the United States: Incidence and Re-Admissions.估算美国坏死性软组织感染的影响:发病率和再入院率。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Jun;22(5):509-515. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.099. Epub 2020 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Fournier gangrene is associated with increased length of stay and higher healthcare costs compared to non-perineal necrotizing soft tissue infections: a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample (2016-2020).与非会阴坏死性软组织感染相比,福尼尔坏疽与住院时间延长和更高的医疗费用相关:对国家住院患者样本(2016 - 2020年)的回顾性分析
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Aug 7;5(1):e178. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.10084. eCollection 2025.
2
A Case of Necrotizing Fasciitis Caused by Mixed Infection of Arcanobacterium haemolyticum and Streptococcus agalactiae.一例由溶血隐秘杆菌与无乳链球菌混合感染引起的坏死性筋膜炎病例。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 13;17(6):e85951. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85951. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document.
外科重症监护中的发热与感染:美国创伤外科学会危重症委员会临床共识文件
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jun 3;9(1):e001303. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001303. eCollection 2024.
4
Practical Review of Necrotizing Fasciitis: Principles and Evidence-based Management.坏死性筋膜炎实用综述:原则与循证管理
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jan 19;12(1):e5533. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005533. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Toxic Shock Syndrome: A Literature Review.中毒性休克综合征:文献综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 18;13(1):96. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010096.
6
Defining the Optimal Antibiotic Duration in Necrotizing Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: Clinical Experience from a Quaternary Referral Center.确定坏死性皮肤和软组织感染的最佳抗生素使用时长:来自四级转诊中心的临床经验
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023 Oct;24(8):741-748. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.294. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
7
Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections-Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?严重坏死性软组织感染 - 创面微生物学是临床转归的预后因素吗?
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4235-4243. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14325. Epub 2023 Aug 30.