• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重坏死性软组织感染 - 创面微生物学是临床转归的预后因素吗?

Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections-Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?

机构信息

Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, BG Unfallklinik Murnau, Murnau, Germany.

Institute for Biomechanics, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4235-4243. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14325. Epub 2023 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.14325
PMID:37646330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10681420/
Abstract

Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) represent similar pathophysiological features, but the clinical course might range from subacute to a rapidly progressive, fulminant sepsis. Initial wound microbiology is the base for the Guiliano classification. The timeline of microbiological colonization has not been described during the clinical course. The role of the different microbiological pathogens on the outcome and mortality is unclear. One hundred eighty patients were included with septic inflammation response syndrome on admission. Initial wound microbiology and the changes in wound microbiology were analysed during the clinical course and correlated with outcome and risk indicators. Overall mortality was 35%. Higher age, a high Charlson Comorbidity Index or ASA score and truncal infections were highly prognostic for a lethal outcome. Microbiological findings revealed significant differences in the persistence of bacteria during the course of disease. Streptococci were only detectable within the first 5 days, whereas other bacteria persisted over a longer period of time. Initial microbiological findings correlated with better prognosis when no causative agent was identified and for gram-negative rods. Varying survival rates were observed for different Streptococci, Staphylococci, Enterococci and other bacteria. The highest odds ratio for a lethal outcome was observed for Enterococci and fungi. Microbiological colonization changes during the clinical course of NSTIs and some microbiologic pathogens are predictive for worsening the outcome and survival. Streptococcus pyogenes is only detectable in the very early phase of NSTI and after 6 days not anymore detectable. Later Enterococci and fungi showed the highest odds ratios for a lethal outcome. Enterococci bacteria and fungi have yet not been considered of clinical relevance in NSTI or even as indicator for worsening the outcome.

摘要

坏死性软组织感染 (NSTIs) 具有相似的病理生理特征,但临床过程可能从亚急性到迅速进展的暴发性脓毒症不等。初始伤口微生物学是 Guiliano 分类的基础。微生物定植的时间进程在临床过程中尚未描述。不同微生物病原体对结果和死亡率的影响尚不清楚。入院时,180 例患者符合败血症炎症反应综合征。分析了初始伤口微生物学和临床过程中伤口微生物学的变化,并与结果和风险指标相关。总体死亡率为 35%。较高的年龄、较高的 Charlson 合并症指数或 ASA 评分和躯干感染与致命结局高度相关。微生物学发现显示,在疾病过程中细菌的持续存在存在显著差异。链球菌仅在最初的 5 天内可检测到,而其他细菌则持续存在更长时间。当未发现病原体时,初始微生物学发现与更好的预后相关,革兰氏阴性杆菌也是如此。不同链球菌、葡萄球菌、肠球菌和其他细菌的存活率差异很大。肠球菌和真菌的致死风险比最高。NSTIs 临床病程中微生物定植的变化和一些微生物病原体可预测预后恶化和生存。化脓性链球菌仅在 NSTI 的早期阶段和 6 天后才可检测到,之后不再可检测到。随后肠球菌和真菌的致死风险比最高。肠球菌细菌和真菌尚未被认为与 NSTI 相关,甚至也不是预示预后恶化的指标。

相似文献

1
Severe necrotizing soft tissue infections-Is wound microbiology a prognostic factor for clinical outcome?严重坏死性软组织感染 - 创面微生物学是临床转归的预后因素吗?
Int Wound J. 2023 Dec;20(10):4235-4243. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14325. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
2
Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis, Diagnosis and Treatment of a Rare Life-Threatening Infection.颈部坏死性筋膜炎:一种罕见的危及生命感染的诊断与治疗
Ear Nose Throat J. 2023 Mar;102(3):NP109-NP113. doi: 10.1177/0145561321991341. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
Does Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Impact the Outcome for Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Infected With Anaerobic Bacteria?负压伤口疗法是否会影响感染厌氧菌的坏死性软组织感染患者的预后?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2024 Apr;25(3):179-184. doi: 10.1089/sur.2023.300. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
The microbiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections.坏死性软组织感染的微生物学
Am J Surg. 2000 May;179(5):361-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(00)00360-3.
5
Can progression of odontogenic infections to cervical necrotizing soft tissue infections be predicted?牙源性感染进展为颈部坏死性软组织感染能否被预测?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Feb;46(2):181-188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.016. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
6
Clostridial Gas Gangrene - A Rare but Deadly Infection: Case series and Comparison to Other Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections.梭状芽孢杆菌性气性坏疽——一种罕见但致命的感染:病例系列及与其他坏死性软组织感染的比较。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1733-1747. doi: 10.1111/os.12804. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
7
Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Review of Predictive Factors for Limb Loss.坏死性软组织感染:导致截肢的预测因素的回顾性研究。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(2):297-309. doi: 10.4055/cios19166. Epub 2022 May 13.
8
Necrotizing fasciitis: an update on epidemiology, diagnostic methods, and treatment.坏死性筋膜炎:流行病学、诊断方法和治疗的最新进展。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2024 Apr 1;37(2):105-111. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000988. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
9
Wound Culture Utility in Negative Surgical Exploration for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection.伤口培养在坏死性软组织感染阴性手术探查中的应用价值
Am Surg. 2019 Oct 1;85(10):1175-1178.
10
Prognostic factors in necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTI): A cohort study.坏死性软组织感染(NSTI)的预后因素:一项队列研究。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Dec;73(6):1006-12.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.08.054. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A rise in severe necrotizing fasciitis- another consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic?严重坏死性筋膜炎的增加——这是新冠疫情的另一个后果吗?
Infection. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02564-2.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Group A Streptococcal Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对A组链球菌坏死性软组织感染的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 10;11(10):ofae572. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae572. eCollection 2024 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Clindamycin for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Decreases Amputation Rate.克林霉素用于治疗坏死性软组织感染可降低截肢率。
J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jul 1;36(7):327-331. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002324.
2
Duration of Antibiotic Therapy in Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: Shorter is Safe.抗生素治疗坏死性软组织感染的时间:越短越安全。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2022 Jun;23(5):430-435. doi: 10.1089/sur.2022.011. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
3
Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score and Patient Outcomes.坏死性筋膜炎评分的实验室风险指标与患者预后
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):38-41. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_17_20. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
4
Utility of the Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis Score: Comorbid Conditions Do Matter.实验室风险指标对于坏死性筋膜炎的效用:合并症很重要。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Oct;22(8):797-802. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.398. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Risk Factors and Predictors of Mortality in Streptococcal Necrotizing Soft-tissue Infections: A Multicenter Prospective Study.链球菌坏死性软组织感染的死亡风险因素和预测因素:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 27;72(2):293-300. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa027.
6
Evaluating the Laboratory Risk Indicator to Differentiate Cellulitis from Necrotizing Fasciitis in the Emergency Department.评估实验室风险指标以在急诊科区分蜂窝织炎与坏死性筋膜炎
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;18(4):684-689. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2017.3.33607. Epub 2017 May 12.
7
Necrotizing fasciitis: treatment concepts and clinical results.坏死性筋膜炎:治疗理念与临床结果
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018 Apr;44(2):279-290. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0792-8. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Laboratory risk indicator for necrotising fasciitis (LRINEC) score for the assessment of early necrotising fasciitis: a systematic review of the literature.用于评估早期坏死性筋膜炎的坏死性筋膜炎实验室风险指标(LRINEC)评分:文献系统评价
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2017 May;99(5):341-346. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0053.
9
Necrotizing soft tissue infections after injection therapy: Higher mortality and worse outcome compared to other entry mechanisms.注射治疗后发生的坏死性软组织感染:与其他进入机制相比,死亡率更高,预后更差。
J Infect. 2015 Sep;71(3):312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.05.013. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
10
Current concepts in the management of necrotizing fasciitis.坏死性筋膜炎治疗的当前概念
Front Surg. 2014 Sep 29;1:36. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00036. eCollection 2014.