• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项采用协同设计开发的癌症运动工具包:混合方法研究。

A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study.

作者信息

Dennett Amy M, Tang Clarice Y, Chiu April, Osadnik Christian, Granger Catherine L, Taylor Nicholas F, Campbell Kristin L, Barton Christian

机构信息

La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2022 Apr 21;8(2):e34903. doi: 10.2196/34903.

DOI:10.2196/34903
PMID:35451966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9073617/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to exercise therapy for cancer survivors is poor. Professional development to support exercise professionals in delivering these interventions is needed. Few online resources exist for exercise professionals to address this issue.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and evaluate a freely available online toolkit to support exercise professionals working with cancer survivors.

METHODS

A 2-phase, experience-based co-design approach was used to develop and evaluate the online toolkit. The two phases were as follows: 1) needs identification and co-design of resources and platform and 2) pilot evaluation. Four co-design workshops were conducted, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to identify key elements for the toolkit. For the pilot evaluation, a customized survey (the Determinants of Implementation Behavior Questionnaire) was distributed to exercise professionals at baseline and 3 months after launch of the online toolkit to determine its usability, utility, and effectiveness in improving their knowledge, confidence, and behavior. Results were reported as the median and interquartile range and changes were calculated using non-parametric tests. Website analytics described site usage after the initial evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five exercise professionals participated in co-designing 8 key elements of the online Cancer Exercise Toolkit: the homepage and pages for getting started, screening and safety, assessment, exercise prescription, education, locations, and resources. For the pilot evaluation, 277/320 respondents (87% of whom were physiotherapists) from 26 countries completed the survey at baseline, with 58 exercise professionals completing follow-up surveys at 3 months. Exercise professionals' knowledge, skills, and confidence in delivering exercise therapy to cancer survivors increased 3 months after baseline (items 1, 6, and 8: median score 5, IQR 3 to 6) to follow-up (items 1 and 6: median score 6, IQR 5 to 6; item 8: median score 5, IQR 5 to 7; P<.001) on a 1 to 7 Likert scale. Most participants (35/44, 80%) agreed or strongly agreed they would recommend the toolkit to colleagues. In the 6 months following the pilot evaluation, the toolkit received an average of 866 views per month.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-designed online Cancer Exercise Toolkit was a useful resource for exercise professionals that may increase their knowledge, skills, and confidence in providing exercise therapy to cancer survivors.

摘要

背景

癌症幸存者获得运动疗法的机会很少。需要开展专业培训,以支持运动专业人员提供这些干预措施。针对运动专业人员解决这一问题的在线资源很少。

目的

开发并评估一个免费的在线工具包,以支持为癌症幸存者提供服务的运动专业人员。

方法

采用两阶段、基于经验的协同设计方法来开发和评估在线工具包。两个阶段如下:1)需求识别以及资源和平台的协同设计;2)试点评估。举办了四次协同设计研讨会,进行了转录和主题分析,以确定工具包的关键要素。对于试点评估,在基线时以及在线工具包推出3个月后,向运动专业人员发放了一份定制调查问卷(实施行为决定因素问卷),以确定其在提高知识、信心和行为方面的可用性、实用性和有效性。结果以中位数和四分位间距报告,并使用非参数检验计算变化。网站分析描述了初始评估后的网站使用情况。

结果

25名运动专业人员参与了在线癌症运动工具包8个关键要素的协同设计:主页以及入门、筛查与安全、评估、运动处方、教育、地点和资源页面。对于试点评估,来自26个国家的277/320名受访者(其中87%是物理治疗师)在基线时完成了调查,58名运动专业人员在3个月时完成了后续调查。与基线时(第1、6和8项:中位数分数为5,四分位间距为3至6)相比,运动专业人员在为癌症幸存者提供运动疗法方面的知识、技能和信心在3个月后的随访中有所提高(第1和6项:中位数分数为6,四分位间距为5至6;第8项:中位数分数为5,四分位间距为5至7;P<.001),采用1至7李克特量表。大多数参与者(35/44,80%)同意或强烈同意他们会向同事推荐该工具包。在试点评估后的6个月里,该工具包平均每月收到866次浏览。

结论

协同设计的在线癌症运动工具包是运动专业人员的有用资源,可能会增加他们为癌症幸存者提供运动疗法的知识、技能和信心。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/213ad42c2389/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/8b6f678ab475/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/dcb5a8d01797/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/213ad42c2389/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/8b6f678ab475/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/dcb5a8d01797/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/75c4/9073617/213ad42c2389/cancer_v8i2e34903_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
A Cancer Exercise Toolkit Developed Using Co-Design: Mixed Methods Study.一项采用协同设计开发的癌症运动工具包:混合方法研究。
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Apr 21;8(2):e34903. doi: 10.2196/34903.
2
Co-development and evaluation of the Musculoskeletal Telehealth Toolkit for physiotherapists.为物理治疗师共同开发和评估肌肉骨骼远程医疗工具包。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2023 Dec 4. doi: 10.1002/msc.1840.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Parent-delivered interventions used at home to improve eating, drinking and swallowing in children with neurodisability: the FEEDS mixed-methods study.家长在家中实施的干预措施,以改善神经发育障碍儿童的进食、饮水和吞咽能力:FEEDS 混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(22):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta25220.
5
A web-based, peer-supported self-management intervention to reduce distress in relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: the REACT RCT.一项基于网络的、由同行支持的自我管理干预措施,旨在减轻精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的痛苦:REACT RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(32):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta24320.
6
Severe Asthma Toolkit: an online resource for multidisciplinary health professionals-needs assessment, development process and user analytics with survey feedback.严重哮喘工具包:多学科卫生专业人员在线资源-需求评估、开发过程和用户分析以及调查反馈。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 24;10(3):e032877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032877.
7
8
Co-design of the web-based 'My Knee' education and self-management toolkit for people with knee osteoarthritis.为膝关节骨关节炎患者共同设计基于网络的“我的膝盖”教育与自我管理工具包。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 28;9:20552076231163810. doi: 10.1177/20552076231163810. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Is an online skin cancer toolkit an effective way to educate primary care physicians about skin cancer diagnosis and referral?在线皮肤癌工具包是否是教育初级保健医生皮肤癌诊断和转诊的有效方法?
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Nov;29(11):2152-9. doi: 10.1111/jdv.13167. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
10
A Codeveloped Web-Based Disability Disclosure Toolkit for Youth With Disabilities: Mixed Methods Pilot Evaluation.一个为残疾青年共同开发的基于网络的残疾信息披露工具包:混合方法试点评估。
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Dec 8;7:e48609. doi: 10.2196/48609.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Recovery: A Co-Designed Intervention to Transform Care for Operable Lung Cancer.助力康复:一项共同设计的干预措施,旨在改变可手术肺癌的护理方式。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70196. doi: 10.1111/hex.70196.
2
Strategies to improve participation in exercise programmes during chemotherapy: a modified nominal group technique.改善化疗期间参与运动计划的策略:一种改良的名义小组技术。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01771-y.
3
Effectiveness of Aerobic Training for Adverse Symptoms Related to Chemotherapy During Treatment: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial With Cost-Effectiveness Assessment.

本文引用的文献

1
Program evaluation of GLA:D® Australia: Physiotherapist training outcomes and effectiveness of implementation for people with knee osteoarthritis.澳大利亚GLA:D®项目评估:物理治疗师培训成果及对膝骨关节炎患者的实施效果
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2021 May 13;3(3):100175. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100175. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Perceptions and work-readiness of Australian physiotherapists in cancer care: a national evaluation.澳大利亚癌症护理物理治疗师的认知和工作准备情况:一项全国性评估。
Physiotherapy. 2021 Dec;113:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
3
Knowledge, confidence and learning needs of physiotherapists treating persistent knee pain in Australia and Canada: a mixed-methods study.
有氧运动对化疗相关不良反应的疗效:一项随机对照试验的方案,包括成本效益评估。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 20;13:e60828. doi: 10.2196/60828.
4
Co-design of the web-based 'My Knee' education and self-management toolkit for people with knee osteoarthritis.为膝关节骨关节炎患者共同设计基于网络的“我的膝盖”教育与自我管理工具包。
Digit Health. 2023 Mar 28;9:20552076231163810. doi: 10.1177/20552076231163810. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
澳大利亚和加拿大治疗持续性膝关节疼痛的物理治疗师的知识、信心和学习需求:一项混合方法研究。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2022 Dec;38(12):2073-2085. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2021.1906805. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
Moving through cancer: Setting the agenda to make exercise standard in oncology practice.穿越癌症:设定议程,使运动成为肿瘤学实践的标准。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):476-484. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33245. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Which Learning Activities Enhance Physical Therapist Practice? Part 1: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Quantitative Studies.哪些学习活动能增强物理治疗师的实践能力?第 1 部分:定量研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2020 Aug 31;100(9):1469-1483. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa107.
6
Physical Activity and Mortality in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.癌症幸存者的体力活动与死亡率:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2019 Oct 17;4(1):pkz080. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkz080. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Cancer rehabilitation.癌症康复
J Physiother. 2020 Apr;66(2):70-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
8
An exercise oncology clinical pathway: Screening and referral for personalized interventions.运动肿瘤临床路径:个性化干预的筛查与转诊
Cancer. 2020 Jun 15;126(12):2750-2758. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32860. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
9
Adopting a collaborative approach in developing a prehabilitation program for patients with prostate cancer utilising experience-based co-design methodology.采用协作方法,利用基于经验的共同设计方法为前列腺癌患者制定康复计划。
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Nov;28(11):5195-5202. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05341-z. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.