• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于计算机断层冠状动脉造影的超选择性有创冠状动脉造影的准确性和潜在获益。

Accuracy and Potential Benefit of Ultraselective Invasive Coronary Angiography Guided by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.

机构信息

Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Department of Cardiology, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 May;34(5):E390-E396. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00271. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.25270/jic/21.00271
PMID:35451996
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is unknown whether computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) can be used to perform ultraselective invasive coronary angiography (ICA) by only visualizing the abnormal coronary artery on CTCA and defer visualization of the normal contralateral coronary artery. This study assessed the accuracy of CTCA in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on CTCA limited to either the left (LCA) or right coronary artery (RCA) in predicting a contralateral coronary artery without abnormalities on CTCA determined to be normal by ICA.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with CAD limited to the LCA or RCA on CTCA. Primary endpoint was the accuracy of CTCA to predict a contralateral coronary artery without abnormalities on CTCA to be normal by ICA. Secondary endpoints were potential reductions in procedure time and radiation exposure if an ultraselective ICA approach would be used compared to standard ICA.

RESULTS

In total, 202 patients were included. CTCA was correct in predicting a normal contralateral coronary artery in 201 of the 202 patients (99.5%). Deferring ICA of the normal contralateral coronary artery on CTCA resulted in a potential reduction in procedure time and dose area product of 4.22 ± 2.67 minutes (61 ± 16% reduction) and 1501 ± 1304 mGy•cm² (29 ± 13% reduction).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, CTCA was extremely accurate in predicting a normal contralateral coronary artery in patients with LCA- or RCA-limited CAD on CTCA. A potential CTCA-guided ultraselective ICA approach was feasible and would have led to a considerable decrease in procedure time and radiation exposure.

摘要

目的

目前尚不清楚是否可以通过仅在 CTCA 上观察到异常的冠状动脉,并延迟对正常对侧冠状动脉的显影,来利用计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)进行超选择性冠状动脉造影(ICA)。本研究评估了 CTCA 在 CTCA 仅局限于左冠状动脉(LCA)或右冠状动脉(RCA)的冠心病(CAD)患者中的准确性,以预测 CTCA 上未见异常的对侧冠状动脉,该对侧冠状动脉通过 ICA 被确定为正常。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了 CTCA 上局限于 LCA 或 RCA 的 CAD 患者。主要终点是 CTCA 预测 CTCA 未见异常的对侧冠状动脉通过 ICA 被确定为正常的准确性。次要终点是如果采用超选择性 ICA 方法,与标准 ICA 相比,手术时间和辐射暴露是否有潜在减少。

结果

共纳入 202 例患者。在 202 例患者中的 201 例(99.5%)中,CTCA 正确预测了正常的对侧冠状动脉。延迟对 CTCA 上正常对侧冠状动脉进行 ICA 检查可使手术时间和剂量面积乘积分别减少 4.22±2.67 分钟(减少 61%±16%)和 1501±1304 mGy•cm²(减少 29%±13%)。

结论

在这项回顾性研究中,CTCA 在预测 CTCA 上 LCA 或 RCA 局限性 CAD 患者正常对侧冠状动脉方面具有极高的准确性。潜在的 CTCA 引导的超选择性 ICA 方法是可行的,并且会大大减少手术时间和辐射暴露。

相似文献

1
Accuracy and Potential Benefit of Ultraselective Invasive Coronary Angiography Guided by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.基于计算机断层冠状动脉造影的超选择性有创冠状动脉造影的准确性和潜在获益。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 May;34(5):E390-E396. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00271. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
The effect of CTCA guided selective invasive graft assessment on coronary angiographic parameters and outcomes: Insights from the BYPASS-CTCA trial.CTCA 指导下选择性有创血管造影评估对冠状动脉造影参数和结局的影响:来自 BYPASS-CTCA 试验的见解。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography Before Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: The BYPASS-CTCA Trial.经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者行冠状动脉造影术前行 CT 冠状动脉造影:BYPASS-CTCA 试验。
Circulation. 2023 Oct 31;148(18):1371-1380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064465. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
Diagnostic performance of computed tomography coronary angiography to detect and exclude left main and/or three-vessel coronary artery disease.计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影检测和排除左主干和/或三支血管冠状动脉疾病的诊断性能。
Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):2934-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2935-6. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
5
CTCA Prior to Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: Patient-Related Outcomes, Imaging Resource Utilization, and Cardiac Events at 3 Years From the BYPASS-CTCA Trial.既往接受搭桥手术患者在有创冠状动脉造影前进行CTCA检查:来自BYPASS-CTCA试验3年时的患者相关结局、影像资源利用及心脏事件
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Dec;17(12):e014142. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014142. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Computed tomography cardiac angiography for planning invasive angiographic procedures in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.计算机断层扫描心脏血管造影术在经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中用于规划有创血管造影程序。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Feb 7;15(15):e1351-e1357. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01185.
7
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease.非创伤性检测诊断冠心病的准确性和临床实用性。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18;152(10):630-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00003.
8
Computed tomography myocardial perfusion vs O-water positron emission tomography and fractional flow reserve.计算机断层扫描心肌灌注与O-水正电子发射断层扫描及血流储备分数的比较
Eur Radiol. 2017 Mar;27(3):1114-1124. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4404-5. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Presenting with Heart Failure of Unknown Etiology in the Middle East.中东地区病因不明的心力衰竭患者中计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影的诊断准确性
Heart Views. 2019 Jul-Sep;20(3):77-82. doi: 10.4103/HEARTVIEWS.HEARTVIEWS_50_18.
10
Positive predictive value of computed tomography coronary angiography in clinical practice.计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影在临床实践中的阳性预测值。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 May 3;156(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
CCTA-Guided Selective Invasive Coronary Catheterization: A Strategy to Reduce Contrast Volume and Improve Efficiency.冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)引导下的选择性侵入性冠状动脉导管插入术:一种减少造影剂用量并提高效率的策略。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;15(7):890. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070890.