• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者行冠状动脉造影术前行 CT 冠状动脉造影:BYPASS-CTCA 试验。

Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography Before Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: The BYPASS-CTCA Trial.

机构信息

Centre for Cardiovascular Medicine and Devices (D.A.J., A.-M.B., M.K., K.S.R., M.A., L.W., N.F., R.R., A.B., A.A., A.M.), Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Barts Cardiovascular Clinical Trials Unit (D.A.J., T.G., A.B., A.A.), Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Circulation. 2023 Oct 31;148(18):1371-1380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064465. Epub 2023 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064465
PMID:37772419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11139242/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting often require invasive coronary angiography (ICA). However, for these patients, the procedure is technically more challenging and has a higher risk of complications. Observational studies suggest that computed tomography cardiac angiography (CTCA) may facilitate ICA in this group, but this has not been tested in a randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, open-label randomized controlled trial assessing the benefit of adjunctive CTCA in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting referred for ICA. Patients were randomized 1:1 to undergo CTCA before ICA or ICA alone. The co-primary end points were procedural duration of the ICA (defined as the interval between local anesthesia administration for obtaining vascular access and removal of the last catheter), patient satisfaction after ICA using a validated questionnaire, and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Linear regression was used for procedural duration and patient satisfaction score; contrast-induced nephropathy was analyzed using logistic regression. We applied the Bonferroni correction, with <0.017 considered significant and 98.33% CIs presented. Secondary end points included incidence of procedural complications and 1-year major adverse cardiac events.

RESULTS

Over 3 years, 688 patients were randomized with a median follow-up of 1.0 years. The mean age was 69.8±10.4 years, 108 (15.7%) were women, 402 (58.4%) were White, and there was a high burden of comorbidity (85.3% hypertension and 53.8% diabetes). The median time from coronary artery bypass grafting to angiography was 12.0 years, and there were a median of 3 (interquartile range, 2 to 3) grafts per participant. Procedure duration of the ICA was significantly shorter in the CTCA+ICA group (CTCA+ICA, 18.6±9.5 minutes versus ICA alone, 39.5±16.9 minutes [98.33% CI, -23.5 to -18.4]; <0.001), alongside improved mean ICA satisfaction scores (1=very good to 5=very poor; -1.1 difference [98.33% CI, -1.2 to -0.9]; <0.001), and reduced incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (3.4% versus 27.9%; odds ratio, 0.09 [98.33% CI, 0.04-0.2]; <0.001). Procedural complications (2.3% versus 10.8%; odds ratio, 0.2 [95% CI, 0.1-0.4]; <0.001) and 1-year major adverse cardiac events (16.0% versus 29.4%; hazard ratio, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.3-0.6]; <0.001) were also lower in the CTCA+ICA group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting, CTCA before ICA leads to reductions in procedure time and contrast-induced nephropathy, with improved patient satisfaction. CTCA before ICA should be considered in this group of patients.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT03736018.

摘要

背景

既往行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者常需行有创性冠状动脉造影(ICA)。然而,对于这些患者,该操作技术上更具挑战性,且并发症风险更高。观察性研究表明,计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影(CTCA)可能有助于该人群的 ICA,但尚未在随机对照试验中得到验证。

方法

这是一项单中心、开放标签的随机对照试验,评估了 CTCA 对既往行冠状动脉旁路移植术并接受 ICA 患者的辅助作用。患者以 1:1 的比例随机分为 CTCA 联合 ICA 组或单纯 ICA 组。主要复合终点为 ICA 的操作时间(定义为局部麻醉用于获得血管通路至最后一根导管取出的时间间隔)、使用经过验证的问卷评估的 ICA 后患者满意度,以及对比剂肾病的发生率。线性回归用于分析操作时间和患者满意度评分;对比剂肾病采用逻辑回归进行分析。我们应用了 Bonferroni 校正,<0.017 认为有统计学意义,且给出 98.33%的置信区间。次要终点包括操作并发症发生率和 1 年主要不良心脏事件。

结果

在 3 年内对 688 例患者进行了随机分组,中位随访时间为 1.0 年。患者的平均年龄为 69.8±10.4 岁,108 例(15.7%)为女性,402 例(58.4%)为白人,且合并症负担较高(85.3%为高血压,53.8%为糖尿病)。从冠状动脉旁路移植术到造影的中位时间为 12.0 年,每位患者平均有 3 个(四分位间距 2-3)桥血管。CTCA+ICA 组的 ICA 操作时间明显缩短(CTCA+ICA 组为 18.6±9.5 分钟,单纯 ICA 组为 39.5±16.9 分钟[98.33%置信区间,-23.5 至-18.4];<0.001),同时 ICA 满意度评分均值更高(1 分为非常好至 5 分为非常差;差值为-1.1[98.33%置信区间,-1.2 至-0.9];<0.001),且对比剂肾病的发生率更低(3.4%比 27.9%;比值比,0.09[98.33%置信区间,0.04-0.2];<0.001)。操作并发症(2.3%比 10.8%;比值比,0.2[95%置信区间,0.1-0.4];<0.001)和 1 年主要不良心脏事件(16.0%比 29.4%;风险比,0.4[95%置信区间,0.3-0.6];<0.001)在 CTCA+ICA 组也较低。

结论

对于既往行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患者,在 ICA 前进行 CTCA 可减少操作时间和对比剂肾病,同时提高患者满意度。对于该类患者,应考虑在 ICA 前进行 CTCA。

注册

网址:https://www.

临床试验

gov;唯一标识符:NCT03736018。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/38dfb1cf3852/cir-148-1371-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/e75dfdc293bc/cir-148-1371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/a4c3b628bf57/cir-148-1371-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/680c656bac71/cir-148-1371-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/38dfb1cf3852/cir-148-1371-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/e75dfdc293bc/cir-148-1371-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/a4c3b628bf57/cir-148-1371-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/680c656bac71/cir-148-1371-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db7a/11139242/38dfb1cf3852/cir-148-1371-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography Before Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With Previous Bypass Surgery: The BYPASS-CTCA Trial.经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者行冠状动脉造影术前行 CT 冠状动脉造影:BYPASS-CTCA 试验。
Circulation. 2023 Oct 31;148(18):1371-1380. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.064465. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
2
The effect of CTCA guided selective invasive graft assessment on coronary angiographic parameters and outcomes: Insights from the BYPASS-CTCA trial.CTCA 指导下选择性有创血管造影评估对冠状动脉造影参数和结局的影响:来自 BYPASS-CTCA 试验的见解。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2024 May-Jun;18(3):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2024.03.004. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
The BYPASS-CTCA Study: the value of Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) in improving patient-related outcomes in patients with previous bypass operation undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial.旁路CTCA研究:计算机断层扫描心脏血管造影(CTCA)在改善既往接受旁路手术的患者进行有创冠状动脉血管造影时与患者相关结局方面的价值:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Sep;9(17):1395. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1455.
4
Computed tomography cardiac angiography for planning invasive angiographic procedures in patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting.计算机断层扫描心脏血管造影术在经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术患者中用于规划有创血管造影程序。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Feb 7;15(15):e1351-e1357. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-01185.
5
CCTA-Guided Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients With CABG: A Multicenter, Randomized Study.CCTA 引导下的 CABG 患者有创冠状动脉造影:一项多中心、随机研究。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Sep;17(9):e014045. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014045. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
6
Coronary Evaluation Before Heart Valvular Surgery by Using Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Versus Invasive Coronary Angiography.心脏瓣膜手术前使用冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术与有创冠状动脉造影术进行冠状动脉评估
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Aug 3;10(15):e019531. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019531. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
7
Accuracy and Potential Benefit of Ultraselective Invasive Coronary Angiography Guided by Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography.基于计算机断层冠状动脉造影的超选择性有创冠状动脉造影的准确性和潜在获益。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2022 May;34(5):E390-E396. doi: 10.25270/jic/21.00271. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
8
Patient satisfaction with coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography: results of a single-center randomized trial.患者对冠状动脉 CT 血管造影与有创冠状动脉造影的满意度:一项单中心随机试验的结果。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Sep;34(9):5644-5653. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10554-x. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
9
Contemporary Discrepancies of Stenosis Assessment by Computed Tomography and Invasive Coronary Angiography.当代计算机断层扫描与有创性冠状动脉造影评估狭窄的差异。
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Feb;12(2):e007720. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007720.
10
Selective Referral Using CCTA Versus Direct Referral for Individuals Referred to Invasive Coronary Angiography for Suspected CAD: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Trial.采用 CCTA 选择性转诊与直接转诊对疑似 CAD 行有创冠状动脉造影检查的患者进行对比:一项随机、对照、开放标签试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jul;12(7 Pt 2):1303-1312. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Impact of CT-Based FFR in Everyday Cardiology: Bridging Computation and Decision-Making.基于CT的血流储备分数在日常心脏病学中的临床影响:连接计算与决策
Biomedicines. 2025 Aug 13;13(8):1969. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081969.
2
Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Expert Opinion from a SCAI/SCCT Roundtable.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术指导经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:SCAI/SCCT 圆桌会议的专家意见
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 May 1;4(6):103664. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2025.103664. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
The Emerging Role of Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in the Left Main Stem Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

本文引用的文献

1
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Cardiovascular Imaging: Danger or Distraction?对比剂诱导的急性肾损伤与心血管成像:危险还是干扰?
Circulation. 2023 Mar 14;147(11):847-849. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.122.062783. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
2
Long-Term Clinical Impact of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury Following PCI: An ADAPT-DES Substudy.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后对比剂相关急性肾损伤的长期临床影响:ADAPT-DES 子研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Apr 11;15(7):753-766. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.026. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
3
Bypass Grafting and Native Coronary Artery Disease Activity.
计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影在左主干经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的新作用。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 26;26(5):37379. doi: 10.31083/RCM37379. eCollection 2025 May.
4
[Role of computed tomography in transcatheter coronary and structural heart disease interventions].计算机断层扫描在经导管冠状动脉及结构性心脏病介入治疗中的作用
REC Interv Cardiol. 2024 May 9;6(3):201-212. doi: 10.24875/RECIC.M24000460. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
5
Successful pharmaco-mechanical treatment of a subtotally occluded venous bypass graft in a patient presenting with acute coronary syndrome: a case report and review of the current literature on the role of local thrombolysis.成功采用药物-机械方法治疗一名急性冠状动脉综合征患者的次全闭塞静脉搭桥移植血管:一例病例报告及关于局部溶栓作用的当前文献综述
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 17;12:1471462. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1471462. eCollection 2025.
6
The Impact of Hydrostatic Pressure on Fractional Flow Reserve in Saphenous Vein Grafts.静水压对大隐静脉移植血管血流储备分数的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):80-89. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31509. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
7
Unsupervised clustering based coronary artery segmentation.基于无监督聚类的冠状动脉分割
BioData Min. 2025 Mar 7;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13040-025-00435-y.
8
Computed Tomography Angiography in the Catheterization Laboratory: A Guide Towards Optimizing Coronary Interventions.导管室中的计算机断层扫描血管造影术:优化冠状动脉介入治疗的指南
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Jan 16;12(1):28. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12010028.
9
Hybrid cardiovascular imaging. A clinical consensus statement of the european association of nuclear medicine (EANM) and the european association of cardiovascular imaging (EACVI) of the ESC.混合心血管成像。欧洲核医学协会(EANM)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)的欧洲心血管成像协会(EACVI)的临床共识声明。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Feb;52(3):1095-1118. doi: 10.1007/s00259-024-06946-w. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
10
[The challenging patient-recommendations and solutions].[具有挑战性的患者——建议与解决方案]
Radiologie (Heidelb). 2024 Dec;64(12):935-945. doi: 10.1007/s00117-024-01369-y. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
旁路移植术与原生冠状动脉疾病活动。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 May;15(5):875-887. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.11.030. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
4
2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Coronary Artery Revascularization: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2021 年 ACC/AHA/SCAI 冠状动脉血运重建指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会联合临床实践指南委员会的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jan 18;79(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
5
Radial versus femoral access in patients with coronary artery bypass surgery: Frequentist and Bayesian meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术患者桡动脉与股动脉入路的比较:频率派和贝叶斯荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Feb;99(2):462-471. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30010. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
6
The BYPASS-CTCA Study: the value of Computed Tomography Cardiac Angiography (CTCA) in improving patient-related outcomes in patients with previous bypass operation undergoing invasive coronary angiography: Study Protocol of a Randomised Controlled Trial.旁路CTCA研究:计算机断层扫描心脏血管造影(CTCA)在改善既往接受旁路手术的患者进行有创冠状动脉血管造影时与患者相关结局方面的价值:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Sep;9(17):1395. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-1455.
7
Computed tomoGRaphy guidEd invasivE Coronary angiography in patiEnts with a previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery trial (GREECE trial): Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized control trial.既往接受冠状动脉搭桥手术患者的计算机断层扫描引导下侵入性冠状动脉造影试验(希腊试验):一项多中心随机对照试验的原理与设计
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2021 Nov-Dec;62(6):470-472. doi: 10.1016/j.hjc.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
8
Postangiography Increases in Serum Creatinine and Biomarkers of Injury and Repair.血管造影术后血清肌酐和损伤及修复生物标志物升高。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep 7;15(9):1240-1250. doi: 10.2215/CJN.15931219. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
9
The value of non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography in imaging patients with coronary artery bypass grafts.经皮冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者冠状动脉无创 CT 血管造影的价值。
Scott Med J. 2020 Aug;65(3):76-80. doi: 10.1177/0036933020936274. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
The L-RECORD Study.L记录研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Apr 27;13(8):1014-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.013.