Suppr超能文献

近眼屈光评估工具(NETRA)与非睫状肌麻痹主观验光的比较。

Comparison of the Near Eye Tool for Refractive Assessment (NETRA) and non-cycloplegic subjective refraction.

机构信息

Department of Optometry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.

出版信息

BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 1;7(1):e000851. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2021-000851. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The NETRA (Near Eye Tool for Refractive Assessment) is a smartphone-based refractive tool that allows for self-evaluation of refractive error. This study investigates the validity of the NETRA with and without cycloplegia to non-cycloplegic subjective refractions (SR).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Participants underwent NETRA measurements without cycloplegia, and again after the administration of cycloplegia (cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1%). Non-cycloplegic SR were also performed. Variation of refractive measurements in symmetric dioptric power space were investigated using stereo-pair comets, hypothesis tests for variances and means. Bland-Altman plots were applied to better understand validity of the NETRA against non-cycloplegic SR. Coefficients of repeatability and intraclass correlation coefficients were also determined.

RESULTS

The sample included 22 women (64.7%) and 12 men (35.3%); most were indigenous Africans (52.9%) with mean age and SD of 20.24±1.95 years. Variation of refractive measurements were mainly stigmatic (spherical), and variation of NETRA measurements decreased after cycloplegia. The pre-cycloplegia NETRA measurements (and their means) for the right and left eyes were more negative (myopic) in power than the post-cycloplegia NETRA measurements and means. On average, eyes were approximately 1.25 D more myopic with the NETRA without cycloplegia. With cycloplegia, NETRA results were in closer agreement with non-cycloplegic SR for the same eyes.

CONCLUSION

NETRA validity to SR, even in the absence of cycloplegia, suggests the instrument may be useful in geographical regions where self-refractions might be potentially helpful in addressing limitations in eye and vision care.

摘要

目的

NETRA(近眼屈光评估工具)是一种基于智能手机的屈光工具,可实现屈光不正的自我评估。本研究旨在评估 NETRA 在未散瞳和散瞳状态下与非散瞳主观验光(SR)的有效性。

方法和分析

参与者首先接受 NETRA 无散瞳测量,然后在使用盐酸环戊酯(1%)散瞳后再次接受测量。同时还进行了非散瞳 SR。使用立体彗星对屈光测量的对称屈光力空间变化进行了研究,采用方差和均值假设检验。还应用 Bland-Altman 图来更好地理解 NETRA 与非散瞳 SR 的有效性。同时还确定了可重复性系数和组内相关系数。

结果

该样本包括 22 名女性(64.7%)和 12 名男性(35.3%);大多数是土生土长的非洲人(52.9%),平均年龄和标准差为 20.24±1.95 岁。屈光测量的变化主要是散光(球差),散瞳后 NETRA 测量值的变化减少。与散瞳后 NETRA 测量值和平均值相比,右眼和左眼的散瞳前 NETRA 测量值(及其平均值)的屈光力更负(近视)。平均而言,未经散瞳的 NETRA 测量结果比散瞳后 NETRA 测量结果双眼近视约 1.25 D。散瞳后,NETRA 结果与同一眼睛的非散瞳 SR 更接近。

结论

即使在没有散瞳的情况下,NETRA 与 SR 的有效性表明,该仪器在可能有助于解决眼部和视力保健限制的自我验光的地理区域可能有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4708/8977766/f3f6425f2598/bmjophth-2021-000851f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验