Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co., Cork P61 C996, Ireland; Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700 AH, The Netherlands.
Animal Production Systems Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700 AH, The Netherlands.
Prev Vet Med. 2022 Jul;204:105640. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105640. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
Large-scale investigation of risk factors for multiple welfare indicators in hybrid pasture-based dairy systems is scarce. Our objective was to identify grazing season welfare risk factors on spring-calving, hybrid pasture-based dairy farms where cows experience periods of both grazing and housing. Herd-level data were collected from visits to 93 farms in the primary dairy producing counties of Ireland. Zero-inflated beta regression analysis was used to assess potential associations between categorical management and resource factors, and commonly measured animal-based welfare indicators: locomotion, body condition, nasal and ocular discharge, tail injury, integument damage, and avoidance behaviour. To account for small sample size due to elimination of farms with missing data, analyses were conducted on both a dataset of complete cases, and a dataset where missing values had been substituted for the most common response through single imputation. Resulting risk factors from both methods of analysis were compared for each indicator. Analyses identified 14 risk factors associated with one or more welfare indicators. The proportion of lame cows was positively associated with a previous housing period of four months or more compared to three months, all cubicles being outside recommended lengths and repairing roadways every two to three years compared to either yearly or more than every four years to never. The proportion of cows below minimum target grazing body condition score of 2.75 was negatively associated with participation in elective herd disease-testing in the past year. The proportion of cows with tail lacerations was positively associated with using a single breeding method, not employing part-time staff and not using brisket boards in cubicles. Previous housing period length was significantly associated with the proportion of cows with integument damage, although the direction of association was unclear. Moderate to severe nasal discharge was positively associated with collecting yard holding times of ≤ 60 min compared to > 90 min. Ocular discharge was negatively associated with manual health record-keeping and a collecting yard below the recommended area of 1.4 m/cow. The proportion of cows with an avoidance response distance > 1 m was positively associated with herding cows without a dog present and having no additional full-time staff. Multiple risk factors were related to the housing period, suggesting that potential carry-over effects of housing management on welfare persist into the grazing period. This emphasizes the need for research to consider both housing and grazing periods in the management of welfare in hybrid pasture-based systems.
大规模调查混合草地奶牛系统中多个福利指标的风险因素的研究较少。本研究的目的是确定春季产犊的混合草地奶牛场的放牧季节福利风险因素,因为这些奶牛会经历放牧和圈养期。从爱尔兰主要奶牛生产县的 93 个农场的访问中收集了群体水平的数据。使用零膨胀贝塔回归分析评估了分类管理和资源因素与常见的基于动物的福利指标之间的潜在关联:运动、身体状况、鼻漏和眼漏、尾巴损伤、体况损伤和回避行为。由于消除了缺失数据的农场,样本量较小,因此通过完全案例数据集和通过单一插补为最常见响应替换缺失值的数据集进行了分析。比较了这两种方法分析得到的每个指标的风险因素。分析确定了 14 个与一个或多个福利指标相关的风险因素。与前三个月相比,四个月或更长时间的圈养期与奶牛跛行比例呈正相关,所有牛床都超出了推荐长度,每两到三年而不是每年或超过四年修复一次道路。处于最低目标放牧身体状况评分 2.75 以下的奶牛比例与过去一年参与选择性畜群疾病检测呈负相关。尾巴有裂伤的奶牛比例与使用单一配种方法、不雇用兼职员工和不在牛床中使用胸骨板呈正相关。以前的圈养期长度与有体况损伤的奶牛比例显著相关,尽管关联方向不清楚。中度至重度鼻漏与收集院停留时间≤60min 呈正相关,与>90min 呈负相关。眼漏与手工健康记录保存和低于建议的 1.4m/牛的收集院面积呈负相关。回避反应距离>1m 的奶牛比例与放牧时没有狗在场且没有额外的全职员工呈正相关。多个风险因素与圈养期有关,这表明圈养管理对福利的潜在持续影响持续到放牧期。这强调了在混合草地奶牛系统的福利管理中需要研究考虑圈养和放牧期。