Relationship between Biodistribution and Tracer Kinetics of C-Erlotinib, F-Afatinib and C-Osimertinib and Image Quality Evaluation Using Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis in Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) driven by activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are best treated with therapies targeting EGFR, i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Radiolabeled EGFR-TKI and PET have been investigated to study EGFR-TKI kinetics and its potential role as biomarker of response in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations (EGFRm). In this study we aimed to compare the biodistribution and kinetics of three different EGFR-TKI, i.e., C-erlotinib, F-afatinib and C-osimertinib.

METHODS

Data of three prospective studies and 1 ongoing study were re-analysed; data from thirteen patients (EGFRm) were included for C-erlotinib, seven patients for F-afatinib (EGFRm and EGFR wild type) and four patients for C-osimertinib (EGFRm). From dynamic and static scans, SUV and tumor-to-blood (TBR) values were derived for tumor, lung, spleen, liver, vertebra and, if possible, brain tissue. AUC values were calculated using dynamic time-activity-curves. Parent fraction, plasma-to-blood ratio and SUV values were derived from arterial blood data. Tumor-to-lung contrast was calculated, as well as (background) noise to assess image quality.

RESULTS

C-osimertinib showed the highest SUV and TBR (AUC) values in nearly all tissues. Spleen uptake was notably high for C-osimertinib and to a lesser extent for F-afatinib. For EGFRm, C-erlotinib and F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-lung contrast, compared to an inverse contrast observed for C-osimertinib. Tumor-to-lung contrast and spleen uptake of the three TKI ranked accordingly to the expected lysosomal sequestration.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of biodistribution and tracer kinetics showed that C-erlotinib and F-afatinib demonstrated the highest tumor-to-background contrast in EGFRm positive tumors. Image quality, based on contrast and noise analysis, was superior for C-erlotinib and F-afatinib (EGFRm) scans compared to C-osimertinib and F-afatinib (EGFR wild type) scans.