Lee I-Cheng, Chao Yee, Lee Pei-Chang, Chen San-Chi, Chi Chen-Ta, Wu Chi-Jung, Wu Kuo-Cheng, Hou Ming-Chih, Huang Yi-Hsiang
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 15;14(8):2014. doi: 10.3390/cancers14082014.
The predictors of response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving regorafenib remain unclear. This study aimed to delineate the determinants of response and survival after regorafenib and evaluate post-progression treatment and outcomes. We retrospectively enrolled 108 patients with unresectable HCC receiving regorafenib after sorafenib failure. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), post-progression survival (PPS) and post-progression treatments were evaluated. The median PFS, OS and PPS were 3.1, 13.1 and 10.3 months, respectively. Achieving disease control by prior sorafenib, early AFP reduction and hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) were associated with significantly better radiologic responses. By multivariate analysis, the time to progression on prior sorafenib, HFSR and early AFP reduction were associated with PFS; ALBI grade, portal vein invasion, HFSR and early AFP reduction were associated with OS. ALBI grade at disease progression, main portal vein invasion, high tumor burden and next-line therapy were associated with PPS. The median PPS was 12 months in patients who received next-line therapy, and the PPS was comparable between patients who received next-line targeted agents and immunotherapy. In conclusion, survival outcomes of regorafenib for HCC have improved in the era of multi-line sequential therapy. Preserved liver function and next-line therapy are important prognostic factors after regorafenib failure.
接受瑞戈非尼治疗的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的反应和生存预测因素仍不清楚。本研究旨在明确瑞戈非尼治疗后反应和生存的决定因素,并评估进展后治疗及结果。我们回顾性纳入了108例索拉非尼治疗失败后接受瑞戈非尼治疗的不可切除HCC患者。评估无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、进展后生存期(PPS)及进展后治疗情况。PFS、OS和PPS的中位数分别为3.1个月、13.1个月和10.3个月。既往索拉非尼治疗实现疾病控制、甲胎蛋白(AFP)早期下降和手足皮肤反应(HFSR)与显著更好的放射学反应相关。多因素分析显示,既往索拉非尼治疗的进展时间、HFSR和AFP早期下降与PFS相关;白蛋白-胆红素(ALBI)分级、门静脉侵犯、HFSR和AFP早期下降与OS相关。疾病进展时的ALBI分级、主要门静脉侵犯、高肿瘤负荷和二线治疗与PPS相关。接受二线治疗患者的PPS中位数为12个月,接受二线靶向药物治疗和免疫治疗的患者PPS相当。总之,在多线序贯治疗时代,瑞戈非尼治疗HCC的生存结果有所改善。肝功能保留和二线治疗是瑞戈非尼治疗失败后的重要预后因素。