Suppr超能文献

哮喘中哮鸣音的主观评估与计算机分析

Subjective assessment vs computer analysis of wheezing in asthma.

作者信息

Pasterkamp H, Wiebicke W, Fenton R

出版信息

Chest. 1987 Mar;91(3):376-81. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.3.376.

Abstract

To determine if wheezing is a reproducible clinical sign, we presented recorded breath sounds from asthmatic patients to four groups of health professionals: pediatric residents, nurses, pediatricians, and physiotherapists. Their subjective assessments included scores of wheezing severity and estimates of wheezing duration. All participants repeated the test at least two weeks later. Results were compared to computer aided spectral analysis of the recorded breath sounds. Interobserver and intraobserver variability fell somewhat between chance and total agreement. In contrast, the computer analysis allowed an objective and reproducible characterization of wheezing in asthma.

摘要

为了确定哮鸣音是否为一种可重复出现的临床体征,我们向四组医疗专业人员展示了哮喘患者呼吸音的录音:儿科住院医师、护士、儿科医生和物理治疗师。他们的主观评估包括哮鸣音严重程度评分和哮鸣音持续时间估计。所有参与者至少在两周后重复了该测试。将结果与所记录呼吸音的计算机辅助频谱分析进行比较。观察者间和观察者内的变异性在偶然一致和完全一致之间有所下降。相比之下,计算机分析能够对哮喘中的哮鸣音进行客观且可重复的特征描述。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验