• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术与金融对绿色技术创新效率的动态影响:来自中国各省的经验证据。

Dynamic Impact of Technology and Finance on Green Technology Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China's Provinces.

机构信息

Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

Center for Economic Development Research and Center of Population, Resource & Environmental Economics Research, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084764.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084764
PMID:35457630
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9029450/
Abstract

In the new stage of global economic development, we hope to achieve both economic development and environmental improvement through green technology innovation. How to effectively obtain the support of technology and finance to green technology innovation is an issue worth studying. This paper constructed an improved super-SBM-DEA efficiency measurement model and combined it with the window analysis method to measure the green technology innovation efficiency (GTIE) of Chinese provinces from 2006 to 2018. Then, based on the PVAR model, the impulse response function and Monte Carlo simulation were used to study the dynamic impact of various variables of technology and finance on GTIE. Finally, the variance decomposition was used to explore the contribution degree of each variable of technology and finance to improving GTIE. The results revealed the following: (1) the average value of China's provincial GTIE from 2006 to 2018 was 0.42, which is relatively low and shows a trend of volatility and rising. (2) From the impulse response results, it could be seen that various variables of technology and finance have always had a positive impact on GTIE. However, there are differences in the influence degree, shock effect, and dynamic transmission mechanism. (3) The results of the variance decomposition showed that government financial technology investment had the highest contribution to the improvement of GTIE, followed by bank technology credit, then by enterprise independent R&D investment, and finally venture capital. This paper offered a reference to developing countries with regard to improving their GTIE and studying the role of technology and finance.

摘要

在全球经济发展的新阶段,我们希望通过绿色技术创新实现经济发展和环境改善。如何有效地获得技术和金融的支持,以促进绿色技术创新,是一个值得研究的问题。本文构建了一个改进的超 SBM-DEA 效率测度模型,并结合窗口分析方法,测度了 2006-2018 年中国各省的绿色技术创新效率(GTIE)。然后,基于 PVAR 模型,利用脉冲响应函数和蒙特卡罗模拟研究了技术和金融的各种变量对 GTIE 的动态影响。最后,利用方差分解法探讨了技术和金融的各种变量对提高 GTIE 的贡献程度。结果表明:(1)2006-2018 年中国省级 GTIE 的平均值为 0.42,相对较低,呈波动上升趋势。(2)从脉冲响应结果可以看出,技术和金融的各种变量对 GTIE 一直都有正向影响,但影响程度、冲击效应和动态传递机制存在差异。(3)方差分解结果表明,政府财政科技投入对提高 GTIE 的贡献最高,其次是银行科技信贷,然后是企业自主研发投入,最后是风险投资。本文为发展中国家提高 GTIE 水平和研究技术与金融的作用提供了参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa6/9029450/2b730799aa18/ijerph-19-04764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa6/9029450/2b730799aa18/ijerph-19-04764-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fa6/9029450/2b730799aa18/ijerph-19-04764-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic Impact of Technology and Finance on Green Technology Innovation Efficiency: Empirical Evidence from China's Provinces.技术与金融对绿色技术创新效率的动态影响:来自中国各省的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 14;19(8):4764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084764.
2
Has green finance facilitated China's low-carbon economic transition?绿色金融是否促进了中国的低碳经济转型?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(38):57502-57515. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19891-8. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Environmental regulation, R&D investment, and green technology innovation in China: Based on the PVAR model.环境规制、研发投入与中国绿色技术创新——基于 PVAR 模型的分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0275498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275498. eCollection 2022.
4
Influence of digital finance and green technology innovation on China's carbon emission efficiency: Empirical analysis based on spatial metrology.数字金融和绿色技术创新对中国碳排放效率的影响:基于空间计量的实证分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156463. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156463. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
5
Green finance, technological progress, and ecological performance-evidence from 30 Provinces in China.绿色金融、技术进步与生态绩效——来自中国 30 个省份的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66295-66314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20501-w. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Will China's R&D investment improve green innovation performance? An empirical study.中国的研发投入会提高绿色创新绩效吗?一项实证研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(26):39331-39344. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18464-5. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
7
Research on the coupling and coordination of green finance, higher education, and green economic growth.绿色金融、高等教育与绿色经济增长的耦合协调研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Aug;29(39):59145-59158. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20026-2. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
8
Can green finance promote green technology innovation in enterprises: empirical evidence from China.绿色金融能否促进企业的绿色技术创新:来自中国的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(37):87628-87644. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28342-x. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
9
The Impact of Digital Economy on the Efficiency of Green Financial Investment in China's Provinces.数字经济对中国各省绿色金融投资效率的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 21;19(14):8884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148884.
10
How does digital finance influence green technology innovation in China? Evidence from the financing constraints perspective.数字金融如何影响中国的绿色技术创新?基于融资约束视角的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115833. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115833. Epub 2022 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Fintech, green imports, technology, and FDI inflow: their role in CO2 emissions reduction and the path to COP26: a comparative analysis of China.金融科技、绿色进口、技术和外国直接投资流入:在减少二氧化碳排放和实现《联合国气候变化框架公约》第 26 次缔约方会议目标方面的作用:中国的比较分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10508-10520. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31732-w. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Spatio-Temporal Pattern of Green Agricultural Science and Technology Progress: A Case Study in Yangtze River Delta of China.中国长江三角洲地区绿色农业科技进步的时空格局研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 17;19(14):8702. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148702.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital Economy Development, Industrial Structure Upgrading and Green Total Factor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China's Cities.数字经济发展、产业结构升级与绿色全要素生产率:来自中国城市的经验证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 19;19(4):2414. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042414.
2
Does the digital finance revolution validate the Environmental Kuznets Curve? Empirical findings from China.数字金融革命是否验证了环境库兹涅茨曲线?来自中国的经验发现。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 13;17(1):e0257498. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257498. eCollection 2022.
3
Has the High-Tech Industry along the Belt and Road in China Achieved Green Growth with Technological Innovation Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability?
中国“一带一路”沿线高科技产业是否通过技术创新效率和环境可持续性实现了绿色增长?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 27;16(17):3117. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16173117.