Khan Alina S, Iqbal Arham, Muhammad Alina A, Mazhar Fariha, Lodhi Muniba F, Ahmed Komal F, Kumar Satesh, Varrassi Giustino, Khatri Mahima
Medicine and Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Medicine and Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Dow International Medical College, Karachi, PAK.
Cureus. 2023 Apr 16;15(4):e37650. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37650. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Community-acquired pneumonia is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world, which incurs significant healthcare costs. The aim of his meta-analysis is to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel non-fluorinated quinolone, nemonoxacin, compared with levofloxacin in treating community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A recursive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus up to August 2022. All randomized clinical trials comparing nemonoxacin to levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia were included. The patients selected for this study had mild to moderate CAP. Each individual received treatment with either nemonoxacin (500 mg or 750 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) for a duration of 3-10 days. Four randomized control trials with a total of 1955 patients were included. Nemonoxacin and levofloxacin were found to have similar clinical cure rates in the treatment of CAP. There were no significant differences reported in the treatment-emergent adverse events between the two drugs (RR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.86, 1.08, I=0%). However, the most frequent symptoms exhibited were gastrointestinal system-related. Both the dosages (500 mg and 750 mg) of nemonoxacin were found to have similar efficacy as that of levofloxacin. Our meta-analysis indicates that nemonoxacin is a well-tolerated and effective antibiotic therapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with clinical success rates comparable to those of levofloxacin. Furthermore, the adverse effects associated with nemonoxacin are generally mild. Therefore, both the 500 mg and 750 mg dosages of nemonoxacin can be recommended as appropriate antibiotic therapy regimens for the treatment of CAP.
社区获得性肺炎是全球发病和死亡的主要原因,会产生高昂的医疗费用。本荟萃分析的目的是评估一种新型非氟喹诺酮类药物奈诺沙星与左氧氟沙星相比,在治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP)方面的临床疗效和安全性。截至2022年8月,使用PubMed、谷歌学术和Scopus进行了递归文献检索。纳入了所有比较奈诺沙星和左氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的随机临床试验。本研究选择的患者患有轻度至中度CAP。每位患者接受奈诺沙星(500mg或750mg)或左氧氟沙星(500mg)治疗,疗程为3至10天。纳入了四项随机对照试验,共1955例患者。发现奈诺沙星和左氧氟沙星在治疗CAP方面具有相似的临床治愈率。两种药物在治疗中出现的不良事件方面没有显著差异(RR=0.95,95%CI:0.86,1.08,I=0%)。然而,最常出现的症状与胃肠道系统有关。发现奈诺沙星的两种剂量(500mg和750mg)与左氧氟沙星具有相似的疗效。我们的荟萃分析表明,奈诺沙星是一种耐受性良好且有效的抗生素疗法,可用于治疗社区获得性肺炎(CAP),临床成功率与左氧氟沙星相当。此外,与奈诺沙星相关的不良反应通常较轻。因此,奈诺沙星的500mg和750mg剂量均可推荐作为治疗CAP的合适抗生素治疗方案。