• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用倾向得分匹配评估保护区的生态保护效果:以中国四川为例。

Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China.

机构信息

Key Laboratory of Land Resources Evaluation and Monitoring in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610068, China.

The Faculty of Geography and Resources Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610068, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 18;19(8):4920. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084920.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19084920
PMID:35457788
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9033088/
Abstract

Protected areas constitute a global strategic resource for enhancing the effectiveness of ecological protection, which can alleviate the impact of unsustainable human production and living activities on the ecological environment. However, the spatiotemporal evolution of ecological protection effectiveness needs to be quantitatively revealed. The net primary productivity (NPP) of plants is an important measure of the effectiveness of ecological protection efforts. The main purpose of this study is to use the relative change in the annual average NPP to evaluate the ecological protection effectiveness of protected areas. We compared the historical changes in the annual average NPP of protected areas in Sichuan Province from 2000 to 2019. We added the spatial coordinates to the impact factor system and adopted propensity score matching (PSM) in a quasi-natural experimental method to determine the experimental group and the control group. The ecological protection effectiveness of the protected areas in the study area in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, and 2019 was measured and classified into three types of changes in protection effectiveness, namely effective, ineffective, or fluctuating. According to the administrative level, type, and spatial distribution, we determined the number and type of changes in the protection effectiveness of different protected areas. The results show that the annual average NPP of the protected areas in Sichuan Province generally fluctuated. The annual average NPP increased in 95.47% of the total protected area and decreased in 4.53%. The overall protection effectiveness of protected areas was positive and significant and gradually improved. Effective protected areas at the national, provincial, and county levels accounted for 40.27% of the total number of protected areas, and the other 14.77% of effective protected area was managed at other administrative levels. Among the different types of protected areas, the proportion of effective protected areas was highest in wild animal protected areas, followed by forest ecology protected areas, wild plant protected areas, and wetland ecology protected areas. The results of this study can provide an important reference for the verification and improvement of the ecological protection effectiveness of various protected areas.

摘要

保护区是增强生态保护有效性的全球战略资源,可以缓解不可持续的人类生产和生活活动对生态环境的影响。然而,生态保护有效性的时空演变需要定量揭示。植物的净初级生产力(NPP)是衡量生态保护努力成效的重要指标。本研究的主要目的是利用植物年平均 NPP 的相对变化来评估保护区的生态保护成效。我们比较了 2000 年至 2019 年四川省保护区的年平均 NPP 的历史变化。我们将空间坐标添加到影响因素系统中,并采用倾向得分匹配(PSM)在准自然实验方法中确定实验组和对照组。测量了研究区域内保护区在 2000 年、2005 年、2010 年、2015 年和 2019 年的生态保护成效,并将其分为保护成效有效、无效或波动三种变化类型。根据行政级别、类型和空间分布,确定了不同保护区保护成效变化的数量和类型。结果表明,四川省保护区的年平均 NPP 普遍波动。在总面积的 95.47%中,年平均 NPP 增加,而在 4.53%中减少。保护区的整体保护成效为正且显著,并逐渐提高。国家级、省级和县级保护区的有效保护区分别占保护区总数的 40.27%,其他 14.77%的有效保护区由其他行政级别管理。在不同类型的保护区中,野生动物保护区的有效保护区比例最高,其次是森林生态保护区、野生植物保护区和湿地生态保护区。本研究的结果可为各种保护区生态保护成效的验证和改进提供重要参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/76b73c2a6b6a/ijerph-19-04920-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/db0c0db92747/ijerph-19-04920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/127151d043ab/ijerph-19-04920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/a44d85a3fc55/ijerph-19-04920-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/5a6318c84248/ijerph-19-04920-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/2489bf910678/ijerph-19-04920-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/7026a94cad30/ijerph-19-04920-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/76b73c2a6b6a/ijerph-19-04920-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/db0c0db92747/ijerph-19-04920-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/127151d043ab/ijerph-19-04920-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/a44d85a3fc55/ijerph-19-04920-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/5a6318c84248/ijerph-19-04920-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/2489bf910678/ijerph-19-04920-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/7026a94cad30/ijerph-19-04920-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7324/9033088/76b73c2a6b6a/ijerph-19-04920-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Ecological Protection Effectiveness of Protected Areas Using Propensity Score Matching: A Case Study in Sichuan, China.利用倾向得分匹配评估保护区的生态保护效果:以中国四川为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 18;19(8):4920. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084920.
2
Spatiotemporal Variation and Driving Forces Analysis of Eco-System Service Values: A Case Study of Sichuan Province, China.生态系统服务价值的时空变化及驱动因素分析:以中国四川省为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;19(14):8595. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148595.
3
[Spatiotemporal variation of productivity and carbon use efficiency of forests in Northeast China from 2000 to 2015.].2000年至2015年中国东北森林生产力与碳利用效率的时空变化
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 May;30(5):1625-1632. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.033.
4
[Spatio-temporal variation of NPP from 1999 to 2015 in Zoige grassland wetland, China].[1999 - 2015年若尔盖草原湿地净初级生产力的时空变化]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2020 Feb;31(2):424-432. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202002.018.
5
[Assessment on the changing conditions of ecosystems in key ecological function zones in China].[中国重点生态功能区生态系统变化状况评估]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Sep;26(9):2758-66.
6
Evolution Modes, Types, and Social-Ecological Drivers of Ecologically Critical Areas in the Sichuan-Yunnan Ecological Barrier in the Last 15 Years.过去 15 年四川-云南生态屏障中生态关键区的演化模式、类型及社会生态驱动因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 27;19(15):9206. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159206.
7
Evaluating spatial-temporal dynamics of net primary productivity of different forest types in northeastern China based on improved FORCCHN.基于改进的 FORCCHN 评估中国东北地区不同森林类型的净初级生产力的时空动态。
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048131. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
8
Spatiotemporal characteristics and influencing factors of net primary production from 2000 to 2021 in China.2000 年至 2021 年中国净初级生产力的时空特征及其影响因素。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(39):91084-91094. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28666-8. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
9
[Spatial-temporal distribution of vegetation net primary productivity and its driving factors from 2000 to 2015 in Shaanxi, China.].2000—2015年中国陕西省植被净初级生产力时空分布及其驱动因素
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Jun;29(6):1876-1884. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.029.
10
Ecological risk assessment of wetland vegetation under projected climate scenarios in the Sanjiang Plain, China.中国三江平原预测气候情景下湿地植被的生态风险评估。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Nov 1;273:111108. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111108. Epub 2020 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of China's Protected Areas in Mitigating Human Activity Pressure.中国保护区在缓解人类活动压力方面的有效性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 30;19(15):9335. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159335.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic impact of six versus eight cycles of standard regimen in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: propensity score-matching analysis.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者接受六个周期与八个周期标准方案治疗的预后影响:倾向评分匹配分析
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100210. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100210. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
2
Impact of public health programs on maternal and child health services and health outcomes in India: A systematic review.印度公共卫生项目对母婴健康服务和健康结果的影响:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Apr;274:113795. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113795. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for the treatment of nonpancreatic periampullary adenocarcinomas: a propensity score matching analysis.
腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗非胰头周围腺癌的比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Am J Surg. 2021 Aug;222(2):377-382. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.023. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
Do Protected Areas Matter? A Systematic Review of the Social and Ecological Impacts of the Establishment of Protected Areas.保护区是否重要?建立保护区对社会和生态影响的系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 4;17(19):7259. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197259.
5
Assessing the Effectiveness of China's Panda Protection System.评估中国大熊猫保护体系的有效性。
Curr Biol. 2020 Apr 6;30(7):1280-1286.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.062. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
The impacts of climate changes and human activities on net primary productivity vary across an ecotone zone in Northwest China.气候变化和人类活动对中国西北地区生态交错带净初级生产力的影响存在差异。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Apr 20;714:136691. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136691. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
7
Effectiveness of China's protected areas in reducing deforestation.中国保护区减少森林砍伐的成效。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Jun;26(18):18651-18661. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-05232-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Evaluating the potential public health impacts of the Toronto cold weather program.评估多伦多寒冷天气应对计划对公众健康的潜在影响。
Environ Int. 2019 Jun;127:381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.042. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
9
Role of nature reserves in giant panda protection.自然保护区在大熊猫保护中的作用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Feb;25(5):4474-4478. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-0831-3. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
10
Effectiveness of Africa's tropical protected areas for maintaining forest cover.非洲热带保护区对维持森林覆盖的有效性。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Jun;31(3):559-569. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12851. Epub 2017 Jan 18.