Which one is better for multi-territory perforator flap survival, central perforator artery or central perforator vein?

BACKGROUND

The survival of multi-territory perforator flap is associated with the position of the perforators. This study aimed to explore whether use of the central perforator artery or vein was better for flap survival.

METHODS

75 male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into three groups (n=25 per group). The flap contained the right and left iliolumbar, left posterior intercostal, and left thoracodorsal angiosomes, termed angiosomes Ⅰ to Ⅳ, respectively. The anastomosis between angiosomes Ⅱ and Ⅲ was termed choke 2. In experimental group 2, only the right iliolumbar vein and the left iliolumbar artery were preserved; in experimental group 1, only the right iliolumbar artery and the left iliolumbar vein were preserved; and in the control group, only the right iliolumbar artery and vein were preserved. On day-7 after the operation, the flap arteriography, intraluminal diameter, average microvascular density, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression and flap survival were compared among groups. Moreover, the percentages of the angiosomes were measured.

RESULTS

The dilation of the choke 2 artery was most pronounced in experimental group 2, followed by experimental group 1, and, finally, the control group (p<0.05). Similar results regarding average microvascular density, VEGF expression, and survival rate were found among the three groups. The percentages of angiosomes Ⅰ to Ⅳ were 23.1%, 23.0±3.1%, 23.0±1.9%, and 31.0±3.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the central perforator vein, the central perforator artery was more beneficial in enhancing flap survival. A multi-territory perforator flap with the central perforator artery could capture 3 angiosomes safely.