Suppr超能文献

儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的因素结构。

The factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in schoolchildren.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jun;125:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies support a bifactor model of childhood ADHD with two specific factors. However, several studies have not compared this model with a bifactor model with three specific factors, few have tested the actual strength of the factors, and none have examined whether "talks excessively" should be treated as a hyperactivity versus impulsivity symptom in children with ADHD.

AIMS

To examine the factor structure of ADHD symptoms and evaluate the relative strength of potential factors.

METHODS

Parent-reports on the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were collected for 2044 schoolchildren from the general population and 147 children with ADHD from a clinical sample. Single-, two- and three-(correlated and bi-)factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Most models had a satisfactory fit. However, a correlated three-factor model where "talks excessively" was included as an indicator of impulsivity, and especially a bifactor model with one strong, well-defined general and two/three (ICD-10 defined) weak specific factors fit the data slightly better than the remaining models.

CONCLUSIONS

The factor structure is best characterized by a bifactor model with a strong general factor and two/three weaker specific factors. Therefore, we suggest emphasizing the ADHD-RS-IV total score rather than the subscale scores in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

大多数研究支持儿童 ADHD 的双因子模型,有两个特定的因子。然而,一些研究没有将该模型与具有三个特定因子的双因子模型进行比较,很少有研究测试因子的实际强度,也没有研究过“过度说话”是否应该被视为 ADHD 儿童的多动与冲动症状。

目的

检验 ADHD 症状的因子结构,并评估潜在因子的相对强度。

方法

从一般人群中收集了 2044 名学龄儿童和 147 名 ADHD 儿童的 ADHD 评定量表(ADHD-RS-IV)家长报告,使用验证性因子分析对单因子、双因子和三因子(相关和双因子)模型进行了检验。

结果

大多数模型拟合度良好。然而,一个相关的三因子模型,其中“过度说话”被纳入冲动的指标,尤其是一个具有一个强、定义明确的一般因子和两个/三个(ICD-10 定义)弱的特定因子的双因子模型,比其余模型稍微更好地拟合数据。

结论

该因子结构最好由一个具有强一般因子和两个/三个较弱特定因子的双因子模型来描述。因此,我们建议在临床实践中强调 ADHD-RS-IV 的总分而不是子量表分数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验