• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的因素结构。

The factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in schoolchildren.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Aarhus University Hospital, Psychiatry, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jun;125:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220
PMID:35462238
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most studies support a bifactor model of childhood ADHD with two specific factors. However, several studies have not compared this model with a bifactor model with three specific factors, few have tested the actual strength of the factors, and none have examined whether "talks excessively" should be treated as a hyperactivity versus impulsivity symptom in children with ADHD.

AIMS

To examine the factor structure of ADHD symptoms and evaluate the relative strength of potential factors.

METHODS

Parent-reports on the ADHD-Rating Scale (ADHD-RS-IV) were collected for 2044 schoolchildren from the general population and 147 children with ADHD from a clinical sample. Single-, two- and three-(correlated and bi-)factor models were tested using confirmatory factor analysis.

RESULTS

Most models had a satisfactory fit. However, a correlated three-factor model where "talks excessively" was included as an indicator of impulsivity, and especially a bifactor model with one strong, well-defined general and two/three (ICD-10 defined) weak specific factors fit the data slightly better than the remaining models.

CONCLUSIONS

The factor structure is best characterized by a bifactor model with a strong general factor and two/three weaker specific factors. Therefore, we suggest emphasizing the ADHD-RS-IV total score rather than the subscale scores in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

大多数研究支持儿童 ADHD 的双因子模型,有两个特定的因子。然而,一些研究没有将该模型与具有三个特定因子的双因子模型进行比较,很少有研究测试因子的实际强度,也没有研究过“过度说话”是否应该被视为 ADHD 儿童的多动与冲动症状。

目的

检验 ADHD 症状的因子结构,并评估潜在因子的相对强度。

方法

从一般人群中收集了 2044 名学龄儿童和 147 名 ADHD 儿童的 ADHD 评定量表(ADHD-RS-IV)家长报告,使用验证性因子分析对单因子、双因子和三因子(相关和双因子)模型进行了检验。

结果

大多数模型拟合度良好。然而,一个相关的三因子模型,其中“过度说话”被纳入冲动的指标,尤其是一个具有一个强、定义明确的一般因子和两个/三个(ICD-10 定义)弱的特定因子的双因子模型,比其余模型稍微更好地拟合数据。

结论

该因子结构最好由一个具有强一般因子和两个/三个较弱特定因子的双因子模型来描述。因此,我们建议在临床实践中强调 ADHD-RS-IV 的总分而不是子量表分数。

相似文献

1
The factor structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in schoolchildren.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的因素结构。
Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Jun;125:104220. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104220. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Bifactor latent structure of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)/oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms and first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms.注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)/对立违抗性障碍(ODD)症状的双因素潜在结构及认知迟缓症状的一阶潜在结构。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Aug;28(8):917-28. doi: 10.1037/pas0000232. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
3
Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder dimensionality: the reliable 'g' and the elusive 's' dimensions.注意力缺陷/多动障碍的维度:可靠的“一般因素(g)”维度与难以捉摸的“特殊因素(s)”维度
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Jan;25(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0709-1. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
4
Evidence for the Trait-Impulsivity Etiological Model in a Clinical Sample: Bifactor Structure and Its Relation to Impairment and Environmental Risk.特质冲动病因模型在临床样本中的证据:双因素结构及其与损伤和环境风险的关系。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018 May;46(4):659-669. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0329-y.
5
The unity and diversity of inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity in ADHD: evidence for a general factor with separable dimensions.ADHD 中注意力不集中和多动/冲动的统一性和多样性:存在具有可分离维度的一般因素的证据。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Nov;37(8):1137-50. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9336-y.
6
The factor structure of ADHD in a general population of primary school children.注意缺陷多动障碍在小学儿童普通人群中的因子结构。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;53(9):927-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02549.x. Epub 2012 Apr 19.
7
Bifactor Models of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD): An Evaluation of Three Necessary but Underused Psychometric Indexes.双因素模型在注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)中的应用:对三个必要但未充分使用的心理计量指标的评估。
Assessment. 2018 Oct;25(7):885-897. doi: 10.1177/1073191116679260. Epub 2016 Nov 20.
8
Bifactor Models of Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Symptomatology in Adolescents: Criterion Validity and Implications for Clinical Practice.青少年注意缺陷/多动障碍症状的双因素模型:效标效度及其对临床实践的意义。
Assessment. 2019 Jul;26(5):799-810. doi: 10.1177/1073191117698755. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
9
General and specific attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder factors of children 4 to 6 years of age: An exploratory structural equation modeling approach to assessing symptom multidimensionality.4 至 6 岁儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的一般和特定因素:评估症状多维性的探索性结构方程建模方法。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2016 Jan;125(1):125-137. doi: 10.1037/abn0000115.
10
Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: predictions of dual-pathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD.注意力缺陷多动障碍/对立违抗障碍症状的双因素潜在结构:注意力缺陷多动障碍双通路/特质冲动性病因模型的预测
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;55(4):393-401. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12165.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behavior Scale in a sample of Hungarian adolescents and young adults.注意缺陷多动障碍症状及正常行为量表自评版在匈牙利青少年和青年样本中的心理测量学特性。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 4;15:1330716. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1330716. eCollection 2024.
2
Are We Measuring ADHD or Anxiety? Examining the Factor Structure and Discriminant Validity of the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale in an Adult Anxiety Disorder Population.我们测量的是注意力缺陷多动障碍还是焦虑症?在成年焦虑障碍人群中检验成人注意缺陷多动障碍自评量表的因子结构和判别效度。
Assessment. 2024 Oct;31(7):1508-1524. doi: 10.1177/10731911231225190. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Differences between DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 revisions of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A commentary on implications and opportunities.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)与《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)中注意力缺陷/多动障碍修订内容的差异:关于影响和机遇的评论
World J Psychiatry. 2023 May 19;13(5):138-143. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i5.138.
4
Network analysis of 18 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms suggests the importance of "" and "" as central symptoms: Invariance across age, gender, and subtype presentations.对18种注意力缺陷多动障碍症状的网络分析表明,“”和“”作为核心症状的重要性:在年龄、性别和亚型表现中具有不变性。 (注:原文中两个引号处内容缺失)
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;13:974283. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974283. eCollection 2022.