• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

敌对媒体认知会影响新闻偏见,但不会影响新闻分享意图。

Hostile media perception affects news bias, but not news sharing intentions.

作者信息

Lo Iacono Sergio, Daniel Dores Cruz Terence

机构信息

Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

University of Essex, Colchester, UK.

出版信息

R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):211504. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211504. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1098/rsos.211504
PMID:35462777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9019511/
Abstract

Hostile media perception (HMP) theory suggests that partisans perceive neutral coverage of news by outlets opposite to their political leaning as biased against their side. We conducted two pre-registered online experiments to assess the effect of HMP on news bias and news sharing intentions regarding two salient and controversial topics in the US: police conduct (Study 1, = 817) and COVID-19 norms (Study 2, = 819). Results show that partisans perceive neutral coverage of news by outlets opposite to their political leaning as biased, even when we account for their prior beliefs regarding the media outlet and news content. However, HMP seems to be limited in its consequences, as it has little impact on partisans' willingness to share news from outlets of opposite political leaning, even though the news is perceived as biased.

摘要

敌对媒体认知(HMP)理论表明,党派人士会将与他们政治倾向相反的媒体对新闻的中立报道视为对他们一方有偏见。我们进行了两项预先注册的在线实验,以评估HMP对美国两个突出且有争议的话题的新闻偏见和新闻分享意图的影响:警察行为(研究1,样本量=817)和新冠疫情规范(研究2,样本量=819)。结果表明,即使我们考虑到党派人士对媒体和新闻内容的先验信念,他们仍会将与他们政治倾向相反的媒体对新闻的中立报道视为有偏见。然而,HMP的影响似乎有限,因为它对党派人士分享来自政治倾向相反的媒体的新闻的意愿几乎没有影响,尽管这些新闻被视为有偏见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/eb943b6b0b5f/rsos211504f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/c6ac19a65e04/rsos211504f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/16a701daaf1d/rsos211504f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/be0f974f8bc6/rsos211504f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/eb943b6b0b5f/rsos211504f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/c6ac19a65e04/rsos211504f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/16a701daaf1d/rsos211504f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/be0f974f8bc6/rsos211504f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7296/9019511/eb943b6b0b5f/rsos211504f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Hostile media perception affects news bias, but not news sharing intentions.敌对媒体认知会影响新闻偏见,但不会影响新闻分享意图。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):211504. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211504. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
On the nature of real and perceived bias in the mainstream media.主流媒体中真实和感知偏见的本质
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 23;13(3):e0193765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193765. eCollection 2018.
3
(Mis)perception of bias in print media: How depth of content evaluation affects the perception of hostile bias in an objective news report.对印刷媒体偏见的(误解):内容深度评估如何影响对客观新闻报道中敌对偏见的感知。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251355. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251355. eCollection 2021.
4
Fake news in the age of COVID-19: evolutional and psychobiological considerations.新冠疫情时代的假新闻:进化和心理生物学方面的考虑。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Sep 19;33(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2022.087. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
5
Polarization or Mainstreaming? How COVID-19 News Exposure Affects Perceived Seriousness of the Pandemic and the Susceptibility to COVID-19 Misinformation?两极分化还是主流化?新冠疫情新闻曝光如何影响对大流行的感知严重性以及对新冠疫情错误信息的易感性?
Sci Commun. 2023 Jun;45(3):367-401. doi: 10.1177/10755470231186396. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
6
Tuberculosis and foreign-born populations in the United States: A mixed methods pilot study of media reporting and political identification.美国的结核病和外国出生人口:媒体报道和政治认同的混合方法试点研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0230967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230967. eCollection 2020.
7
Where do cross-cutting discussions happen?: Identifying cross-cutting comments on YouTube videos of political vloggers and mainstream news outlets.交叉讨论发生在哪里?:在政治博主和主流新闻媒体的 YouTube 视频中识别交叉评论。
PLoS One. 2024 May 29;19(5):e0302030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302030. eCollection 2024.
8
Public thoughts on incentivizing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the United States: testing hostile media bias with user-generated comments.美国公众对激励新冠疫苗接种的看法:通过用户生成的评论检验敌对媒体偏见
Front Sociol. 2023 Oct 31;8:1041454. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1041454. eCollection 2023.
9
True, justified, belief? Partisanship weakens the positive effect of news media literacy on fake news detection.真实、合理的信念?党派偏见削弱了新闻媒体素养对虚假新闻检测的积极影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 26;14:1242865. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1242865. eCollection 2023.
10
Partisans neither expect nor receive reputational rewards for sharing falsehoods over truth online.党派人士在网上分享虚假信息而非真相时,既不期待也不会获得声誉上的回报。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jul 24;3(8):pgae287. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae287. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 vulnerability and perceived norm violations predict loss of social trust: A pre-post study.COVID-19 脆弱性和感知到的规范违反预测社会信任的丧失:一项前后测研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Dec;291:114513. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114513. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
2
A literature review of the economics of COVID-19.关于2019冠状病毒病经济学的文献综述。
J Econ Surv. 2021 Sep;35(4):1007-1044. doi: 10.1111/joes.12423. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
3
US law enforcement policy predictors of race-specific police fatalities during 2015-16.2015-16 年美国执法政策对特定种族警察死亡事件的预测。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0252749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252749. eCollection 2021.
4
The consequences of online partisan media.网络党派媒体的后果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 6;118(14). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2013464118.
5
The Psychology of Fake News.假新闻的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 May;25(5):388-402. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
6
Cognitive reflection correlates with behavior on Twitter.认知反射与 Twitter 上的行为相关。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 10;12(1):921. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20043-0.
7
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Relationships Between Initial COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Protective Health Behaviors: A National Survey.新冠病毒初期风险感知与防护健康行为的关系:一项全国性调查。
Am J Prev Med. 2020 Aug;59(2):157-167. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 22.
9
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on Twitter.在线调查中自我报告的分享政治新闻文章的意愿与在 Twitter 上的实际分享相关。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 10;15(2):e0228882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228882. eCollection 2020.