Liu Haiyang, Yang Xu, Guo Lei-Lei, Li Jin-Long, Xu Guang, Lei Yunxiao, Li Xiaoping, Sun Lu, Yang Liu, Yuan Ting, Wang Congzhi, Zhang Dongmei, Wei Huanhuan, Li Jing, Liu Mingming, Hua Ying, Li Yuanzhen, Che Hengying, Zhang Lin
Student Health Center, Wannan Medical College, Wuhu, China.
Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 7;13:848849. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.848849. eCollection 2022.
Prefrailty and frailty are two common conditions among older individuals. Recent studies have reported the association between frailty and depressive symptoms, but whether those conditions could predict depressive symptoms is still inconsistent in a few longitudinal studies. In our study, we aimed to estimate the cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between frailty and incident depressive symptoms in a nationally representative sample of community-dwelling middle-aged and older Chinese adults.
Data were obtained from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), which included 17,284 adults aged ≥ 45 years. Participants were followed every two years using a face-to-face, computer-aided personal interview (CAPI) and structured questionnaire. We excluded participants with no follow-up data. The numbers of individuals who completed the baseline surveys were 2,579 and follow-up surveys were 839 for the short-term (2 years from 2011 to 2013) and 788 for the long-term (4 years from 2011 to 2015). In addition, Frailty was measured by the Fried criteria and depressive symptoms were estimated by the Chinese version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression scale (CES-D). Logistic regression was used to analyze the odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the cross-sectional associations of frailty and its components with depressive symptoms in the participants at baseline. Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted using the hazard ratio (HR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the prospective associations of baseline frailty and pre-frailty and its component in the participants without depressive symptoms at baseline.
At baseline, 57.93% of participants had depressive symptoms and 55.84% had pre-frail and 11.63% had frailty. In the cross-sectional analysis, both pre-frailty (OR = 5.293, 95%CI 4.363-6.422) and frailty (OR = 16.025, 95%CI 10.948-23.457) were associated with depressive symptoms. In the longitudinal analysis, frailty [HR = 1.395 (0.966-2.013)] and pre-frailty [HR = 2.458 (0.933, 6.479)] were not significantly associated with incident depressive symptoms in a full-adjusted model among participants free of baseline depressive symptoms during the short-term. However, frailty [HR = 1.397 (1.017, 1.920)] and pre-frailty [HR = 2.992 (1.210, 7.397)] were significantly associated with incident depressive symptoms during the short term. In the components of frailty, slowness [HR = 1.597 (1.078, 2.366)] was associated with an increased risk of depressive symptoms onset during the short-term. Weakness [HR = 2.08 (1.055, 4.104)] and exhaustion [HR = 1.928 (1.297, 2.867)] were associated with increased risk of depressive symptoms onset during the short-term.
Among the middle-aged and older adults, frailty, pre-frailty did not predict depressive symptoms during 2 years of follow-up, when accounting for the potential confounders, slowness considered alone predicted depressive symptoms. Additionally, frailty, pre-frailty predicted depressive symptoms during 4 years of follow-up, when accounting for the potential confounders, weakness and exhaustion considered alone predicted depressive symptoms.
衰弱前期和衰弱是老年人中两种常见的状况。近期研究报告了衰弱与抑郁症状之间的关联,但在一些纵向研究中,这些状况能否预测抑郁症状仍不一致。在我们的研究中,我们旨在评估在中国具有全国代表性的社区居住中老年成年人样本中,衰弱与新发抑郁症状之间的横断面和纵向关联。
数据来自中国健康与养老追踪调查(CHARLS),其中包括17284名年龄≥45岁的成年人。参与者每两年接受一次面对面的计算机辅助个人访谈(CAPI)和结构化问卷调查。我们排除了没有随访数据的参与者。完成基线调查的个体数量在短期(2011年至2013年的2年)为2579人,随访调查为839人;长期(2011年至2015年的4年)随访调查为788人。此外,衰弱采用弗里德标准进行测量,抑郁症状采用中文版流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)进行评估。采用逻辑回归分析比值比(OR)以及基线时参与者中衰弱及其组成部分与抑郁症状的横断面关联的95%置信区间(CI)。对基线时无抑郁症状的参与者,采用Cox比例风险分析计算风险比(HR)以及基线衰弱前期和衰弱及其组成部分的前瞻性关联的95%置信区间(CI)。
在基线时,57.93%的参与者有抑郁症状,55.84%有衰弱前期,11.63%有衰弱。在横断面分析中,衰弱前期(OR = 5.293,95%CI 4.363 - 6.422)和衰弱(OR = 16.025,95%CI 10.948 - 23.457)均与抑郁症状相关。在纵向分析中,在短期的完全调整模型中,对于基线时无抑郁症状的参与者,衰弱[HR = 1.395(0.966 - 2.013)]和衰弱前期[HR = 2.458(0.933,6.479)]与新发抑郁症状无显著关联。然而,在短期内,衰弱[HR = 1.397(1.017,1.920)]和衰弱前期[HR = 2.992(1.210,7.397)]与新发抑郁症状显著相关。在衰弱的组成部分中,行动迟缓[HR = 1.597(1.078,2.366)]与短期内抑郁症状发作风险增加相关。虚弱[HR = 2.08(1.055,4.104)]和疲惫[HR = 1.928(1.297,2.867)]与短期内抑郁症状发作风险增加相关。
在中老年成年人中,在考虑潜在混杂因素时,衰弱前期和衰弱在2年随访期间不能预测抑郁症状,单独考虑行动迟缓可预测抑郁症状。此外,在考虑潜在混杂因素时,衰弱前期和衰弱在4年随访期间可预测抑郁症状,单独考虑虚弱和疲惫可预测抑郁症状。