Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cambridge, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, CB2 0SW, UK.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Nov;84:194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
Observational epidemiological analyses demonstrated a decreased risk of death and severe morbidity associated with caesarean delivery at term but an increased risk at preterm gestational age. A multicentre international randomized controlled compared planned caesarean section with vaginal birth and observed no difference in outcome; however, the trial included preterm and term births in approximately similar proportions. A subsequent re-analysis of the trial demonstrated that planned caesarean section was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcome at preterm gestational ages, but reduced the risk of perinatal complications at term, consistent with the epidemiological studies. Hence, decision-making around mode of delivery for twins should recommend against routine caesarean delivery preterm. At term, the balance of risks and benefits will vary according to the mother's prioritization of avoiding intervention, her attitude to managing the risks of uncommon but potentially severe adverse events, and her plans and potential for future pregnancies.
观察性流行病学分析表明,与足月剖宫产相比,早产时剖宫产的死亡和严重发病率风险降低,但在早产时剖宫产的风险增加。一项多中心国际随机对照试验比较了计划剖宫产与阴道分娩,结果发现两者的结局无差异;然而,该试验中早产和足月分娩的比例大致相似。随后对该试验的重新分析表明,计划剖宫产与早产时不良新生儿结局的风险增加相关,但在足月时降低了围产期并发症的风险,与流行病学研究一致。因此,在决定双胞胎的分娩方式时,不建议常规在早产时行剖宫产。在足月时,风险和益处的平衡将根据母亲对避免干预的重视程度、她对管理罕见但潜在严重不良事件风险的态度以及她的计划和未来怀孕的可能性而有所不同。