• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

既往使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂是否会改变白细胞介素(IL)-17 或 IL-12/23 抑制剂治疗银屑病和银屑病关节炎的疗效?系统评价的结果。

Does previous use of tumour necrosis inhibitors change the therapeutic effect of interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis? Results of a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Tsinghua Clinical Research Institute (TCRI), School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Sep;47(9):1627-1635. doi: 10.1111/ced.15237. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1111/ced.15237
PMID:35466472
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) were the first biologics approved for the treatment of psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, some patients are intolerant of or unresponsive to TNFi.

AIM

To investigate the therapeutic effect of interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-12/23 inhibitors in patients with PsO or psoriatic arthritis PsA who were intolerant of or had responded inadequately to TNFi therapy (TNFi-experienced patients).

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials searched from the PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases was conducted on 17 May 2021. Responses of 75% and 90% improvement on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI75, PASI90), 20%, 50% and 70% improvement on the American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20, ACR50, ACR70), and full resolution of dactylitis/enthesitis were used to assess the treatment efficacy.

RESULTS

In total, 7 studies with a total of 3398 patients with PsA were included, 1330 of whom were intolerant of or had responded inadequately to TNFi. All studies were categorized as having low risk of bias. For IL-17A inhibitors, there were significantly higher achievements in all of the endpoints compared with placebo, but the proportions of patients achieving these endpoints were lower in TNFi-experienced patients compared with TNFi-naïve patients. However, the differences between TNFi-experienced and TNFi-naïve patients were significant only for ACR responses and for full resolution of enthesitis. For IL-12/23 inhibitors, only the results for ACR20 response were reported. Significantly more TNFi-experienced patients achieved ACR20 response compared with patients receiving placebo, and the differences in treatment efficacy between TNFi-experienced and TFNi-naïve patients was not significant.

CONCLUSION

IL-17A and IL-12/23 inhibitors still had efficacy for patients with PsO or PsA had failed or were intolerant to TNFi therapy; however, the efficacy was lower than that in TNFi-naïve patients. Further studies to confirm these findings are warranted.

摘要

背景

肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)是首批获批用于治疗银屑病(PsO)和银屑病关节炎(PsA)的生物制剂。然而,一些患者对 TNFi 不耐受或无应答。

目的

研究白细胞介素(IL)-17 和 IL-12/23 抑制剂在对 TNFi 治疗不耐受或应答不足(TNFi 经验患者)的 PsO 或 PsA 患者中的治疗效果。

方法

于 2021 年 5 月 17 日对 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase 数据库进行了系统评价的随机对照试验检索。75%和 90%的银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI75、PASI90)改善、20%、50%和 70%的美国风湿病学会反应标准(ACR20、ACR50、ACR70)改善以及掌跖关节炎/肌腱端炎的完全缓解被用于评估治疗效果。

结果

共纳入了 7 项共 3398 例 PsA 患者的研究,其中 1330 例患者对 TNFi 不耐受或应答不足。所有研究均被归类为低偏倚风险。对于 IL-17A 抑制剂,与安慰剂相比,所有终点均有显著更高的达标率,但 TNFi 经验患者的达标率低于 TNFi 初治患者。然而,仅在 ACR 反应和肌腱端炎的完全缓解方面,TNFi 经验患者与 TNFi 初治患者之间的差异有统计学意义。对于 IL-12/23 抑制剂,仅报告了 ACR20 反应的结果。与接受安慰剂的患者相比,更多的 TNFi 经验患者达到 ACR20 反应,且 TNFi 经验患者与 TNFi 初治患者之间的疗效差异无统计学意义。

结论

IL-17A 和 IL-12/23 抑制剂对 TNFi 治疗失败或不耐受的 PsO 或 PsA 患者仍有效,但疗效低于 TNFi 初治患者。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现。

相似文献

1
Does previous use of tumour necrosis inhibitors change the therapeutic effect of interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-12/23 inhibitors on psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis? Results of a systematic review.既往使用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂是否会改变白细胞介素(IL)-17 或 IL-12/23 抑制剂治疗银屑病和银屑病关节炎的疗效?系统评价的结果。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2022 Sep;47(9):1627-1635. doi: 10.1111/ced.15237. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
2
Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation.依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗银屑病关节炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(31):iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239. doi: 10.3310/hta10310.
3
A systematic review of the effectiveness of adalimumab, etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults and an economic evaluation of their cost-effectiveness.阿达木单抗、依那西普和英夫利昔单抗治疗成人类风湿关节炎有效性的系统评价及其成本效益的经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(42):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-229. doi: 10.3310/hta10420.
4
Comparative effectiveness of abatacept, apremilast, secukinumab and ustekinumab treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.阿巴西普、阿普米司特、司库奇尤单抗和乌司奴单抗治疗银屑病关节炎的疗效比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Rheumatol Int. 2018 Feb;38(2):189-201. doi: 10.1007/s00296-017-3919-7. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Etanercept and efalizumab for the treatment of psoriasis: a systematic review.依那西普和依法利珠单抗治疗银屑病:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(46):1-233, i-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10460.
8
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
9
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of anakinra for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in adults: a systematic review and economic analysis.阿那白滞素治疗成人类风湿关节炎的临床疗效与成本效益:一项系统评价与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2004 May;8(18):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-105. doi: 10.3310/hta8180.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Psoriatic Arthritis: Treatment Pathways and Patient-Specific Strategies for Improved Outcomes.银屑病关节炎的应对之道:改善治疗效果的治疗途径及个性化策略
Drugs. 2025 May 11. doi: 10.1007/s40265-025-02192-y.
2
Sequential biologic therapy in the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国序贯生物疗法治疗活动性银屑病关节炎的成本效益分析
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Apr;44(4):1597-1606. doi: 10.1007/s10067-025-07368-1. Epub 2025 Feb 21.
3
Bimekizumab treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and prior inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: 52-week safety and efficacy from the phase III BE COMPLETE study and its open-label extension BE VITAL.
比美吉珠单抗治疗肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗应答不足的活动性银屑病关节炎患者:III 期 BE COMPLETE 研究及其开放标签扩展 BE VITAL 的 52 周安全性和疗效。
RMD Open. 2024 Feb 22;10(1):e003855. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003855.