• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员对桑菲利波综合征有意义且相关的临床结局评估的评价

Caregivers' assessment of meaningful and relevant clinical outcome assessments for Sanfilippo syndrome.

作者信息

Porter Katherine Ackerman, O'Neill Cara, Drake Elise, Andrews Sara M, Delaney Kathleen, Parker Samantha, Escolar Maria L, Montgomery Stacey, Moon William, Worrall Carolyn, Peay Holly L

机构信息

Center for Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Cure Sanfilippo Foundation, Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Apr 25;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00447-w.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-022-00447-w
PMID:35467223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9038975/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Sanfilippo syndrome is a rare multisystem disease with no approved treatments. This study explores caregiver perspectives on the most impactful symptoms and patient-relevant clinical outcomes assessments. The pediatric onset and progressive neurodegenerative nature of Sanfilippo limits use of self-report in clinical research. This study obtains Sanfilippo caregiver data to support the selection of fit-for-purpose and patient-relevant clinical outcome assessments (COAs).

METHODS

We conducted an asynchronous online focus group (n = 11) followed by individual interviews with caregivers (n = 19) of children with Sanfilippo syndrome. All participants reported on the impact of disease symptoms and level of unmet treatment need across Sanfilippo symptom domains. Focus group participants reviewed existing assessments relating to 8 symptom domains (15 total assessments) and provided feedback on meaningfulness and relevance. Focus group data were used to reduce the number of assessments included in subsequent interviews to 8 COAs across 7 symptom domains: communication, eating, sleep, mobility, pain, behavior and adapting. Interview respondents provided data on meaningfulness and relevance of assessments. Data were coded using an item-tracking matrix. Data summaries were analyzed by caregivers' responses regarding meaningfulness; relevance to Sanfilippo syndrome; and based on caregiver indication of missing or problematic subdomains and items.

RESULTS

Participants' children were 2-24 years in age and varied in disease progression. Caregivers reported communication and mobility as highly impactful domains with unmet treatment needs, followed closely by pain and sleep. Domains such as eating, adaptive skills, and behaviors were identified as impactful but with relatively less priority, by comparison. Participants endorsed the relevance of clinical outcome assessments associated with communication, eating, sleep, and pain, and identified them as highly favorable for use in a clinical trial. Participants specified some refinements in existing assessments to best reflect Sanfilippo symptoms and disease course.

DISCUSSION

The identification of impactful symptoms to treat and relevant and meaningful clinical outcome assessments supports patient-focused drug development. Our results inform targets for drug development and the selection of primary and secondary outcome assessments with high meaningfulness and face validity to Sanfilippo syndrome caregivers. Assessments identified as less optimal might be refined, replaced, or remain if the clinical trial necessitates.

摘要

目的

桑菲利波综合征是一种罕见的多系统疾病,目前尚无获批的治疗方法。本研究探讨了护理人员对最具影响力的症状以及与患者相关的临床结局评估的看法。桑菲利波综合征的儿童期发病和进行性神经退行性本质限制了自我报告在临床研究中的应用。本研究获取了桑菲利波综合征护理人员的数据,以支持选择适合目的且与患者相关的临床结局评估(COA)。

方法

我们开展了一次异步在线焦点小组访谈(n = 11),随后对桑菲利波综合征患儿的护理人员进行了个人访谈(n = 19)。所有参与者都报告了疾病症状的影响以及桑菲利波综合征各症状领域未满足的治疗需求水平。焦点小组参与者审查了与8个症状领域相关的现有评估(共15项评估),并就评估的意义和相关性提供了反馈。焦点小组的数据用于将后续访谈中纳入的评估数量减少到7个症状领域的8个COA:沟通、进食、睡眠、活动能力、疼痛、行为和适应能力。访谈受访者提供了关于评估的意义和相关性的数据。数据使用项目跟踪矩阵进行编码。通过护理人员对意义的回答、与桑菲利波综合征的相关性以及基于护理人员对缺失或有问题的子领域和项目的指示来分析数据总结。

结果

参与者的孩子年龄在2至24岁之间,疾病进展情况各不相同。护理人员报告称,沟通和活动能力是未满足治疗需求的最具影响力的领域,其次是疼痛和睡眠。相比之下,进食、适应技能和行为等领域虽被确定为有影响,但优先级相对较低。参与者认可与沟通、进食、睡眠和疼痛相关的临床结局评估的相关性,并认为它们非常适合用于临床试验。参与者指出了对现有评估的一些改进,以最好地反映桑菲利波综合征的症状和病程。

讨论

确定需要治疗的有影响力的症状以及相关且有意义的临床结局评估有助于以患者为中心的药物研发。我们的研究结果为药物研发的目标以及对桑菲利波综合征护理人员具有高意义和表面效度的主要和次要结局评估的选择提供了信息。如果临床试验有必要,被认为不太理想的评估可能会得到改进、替换或保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b214/9038975/d6818bf1977e/41687_2022_447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b214/9038975/d6818bf1977e/41687_2022_447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b214/9038975/d6818bf1977e/41687_2022_447_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Caregivers' assessment of meaningful and relevant clinical outcome assessments for Sanfilippo syndrome.护理人员对桑菲利波综合征有意义且相关的临床结局评估的评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Apr 25;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00447-w.
2
Parent Experiences of Sanfilippo Syndrome Impact and Unmet Treatment Needs: A Qualitative Assessment.桑菲利波综合征对家长的影响及未满足的治疗需求:一项定性评估
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00226-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
Understanding dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) symptoms and impacts on daily life: a qualitative interview study with patients and caregivers.了解齿状核红核苍白球路易体萎缩症(DRPLA)的症状及其对日常生活的影响:一项对患者及其照料者的定性访谈研究
Ther Adv Rare Dis. 2024 May 20;5:26330040241252447. doi: 10.1177/26330040241252447. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
4
Developing Angelman syndrome-specific clinician-reported and caregiver-reported measures to support holistic, patient-centered drug development.制定安格曼综合征特定的临床医生报告和护理人员报告的措施,以支持整体的、以患者为中心的药物开发。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2023 Jun 22;18(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13023-023-02729-y.
5
Analysis of the caregiver burden associated with Sanfilippo syndrome type B: panel recommendations based on qualitative and quantitative data.分析与 Sanfilippo 综合征 B 型相关的照顾者负担:基于定性和定量数据的小组建议。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 Jul 8;14(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1150-1.
6
Qualitative research with patients and caregivers of patients with PIK3CA related overgrowth spectrum: content validity of clinical outcome assessments.针对PIK3CA相关过度生长谱系患者及其照料者的定性研究:临床结局评估的内容效度
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Jul 13;6(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00481-8.
7
A Conceptual Model of Angelman Syndrome and Review of Relevant Clinical Outcomes Assessments (COAs).安格曼综合征概念模型与相关临床结局评估工具(COAs)的综述。
Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):97-112. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0323-7.
8
Biomarkers for predicting disease course in Sanfilippo syndrome: An urgent unmet need in childhood-onset dementia.预测 Sanfilippo 综合征疾病进程的生物标志物:儿童发病痴呆症的迫切未满足需求。
J Neurochem. 2023 Aug;166(3):481-496. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15891. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
9
GM1-gangliosidosis: The caregivers' assessments of symptom impact and most important symptoms to treat.GM1 神经节苷脂贮积症:照料者对症状影响的评估以及最需要治疗的症状。
Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Feb;191(2):408-423. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63038. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
10
Patient and caregiver perspective on pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis and newly developed symptom questionnaires*.患者及照料者对儿童嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎及新开发症状问卷的看法*
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Dec;24(12):3369-81. doi: 10.1185/03007990802536900.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavioural disorders and sleep problems in Sanfilippo syndrome: overlaps with some other conditions and importance indications.桑菲力波综合征中的行为障碍与睡眠问题:与其他一些病症的重叠及重要指征
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;34(6):1795-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00787-025-02661-5. Epub 2025 Mar 15.
2
Review of clinical trials and guidelines for children and youth with mucopolysaccharidosis: outcome selection and measurement.儿童和青少年黏多糖贮积症的临床试验和指南综述:结局选择和测量。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024 Oct 23;19(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s13023-024-03364-x.
3
Anakinra in Sanfilippo syndrome: a phase 1/2 trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Parent Experiences of Sanfilippo Syndrome Impact and Unmet Treatment Needs: A Qualitative Assessment.桑菲利波综合征对家长的影响及未满足的治疗需求:一项定性评估
Neurol Ther. 2021 Jun;10(1):197-212. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00226-z. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
2
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.快速定性研究技术:文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.
3
Patient-relevant outcomes: what are we talking about? A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity.
安那白滞素治疗黏多糖贮积症 Sanfilippo 型:1/2 期临床试验。
Nat Med. 2024 Sep;30(9):2473-2479. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03079-3. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Friedreich Ataxia Caregiver-Reported Health Index: Development of a Novel, Disease-Specific Caregiver-Reported Outcome Measure.弗里德赖希共济失调患者照料者报告的健康指数:一种新型的、针对特定疾病的照料者报告结局指标的开发
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Jun;14(3):e200303. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200300. Epub 2024 May 10.
5
Sanfilippo Syndrome: Optimizing Care with a Multidisciplinary Approach.桑菲利波综合征:采用多学科方法优化护理。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Sep 19;15:2097-2110. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S362994. eCollection 2022.
患者相关结局:我们在讨论什么?一项改善概念清晰度的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05442-9.
4
Pain in Mucopolysaccharidoses: Analysis of the Problem and Possible Treatments.黏多糖贮积症的疼痛:问题分析及可能的治疗方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 8;19(10):3063. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103063.
5
Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review.罕见病患者报告结局测量指标:叙事性综述。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018 Apr 23;13(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x.
6
Observing the advanced disease course in mucopolysaccharidosis, type IIIA; a case series.观察 IIIA 型黏多糖贮积症的晚期病程;病例系列研究。
Mol Genet Metab. 2018 Feb;123(2):123-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
The use of Facebook for virtual asynchronous focus groups in qualitative research.在定性研究中使用脸书进行虚拟异步焦点小组讨论。
Contemp Nurse. 2018 Feb;54(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1386072. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
8
How close are we to therapies for Sanfilippo disease?我们离治疗 Sanfilippo 病的疗法还有多远?
Metab Brain Dis. 2018 Feb;33(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s11011-017-0111-4. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
9
An investigation of the middle and late behavioural phenotypes of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type-III.III型黏多糖贮积症的中晚期行为表型研究。
J Neurodev Disord. 2014;6(1):46. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-46. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
10
Patient-Focused Drug Development: A New Direction for Collaboration.以患者为中心的药物研发:合作的新方向。
Med Care. 2015 Jan;53(1):9-17. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000273.