• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在定性研究中使用脸书进行虚拟异步焦点小组讨论。

The use of Facebook for virtual asynchronous focus groups in qualitative research.

作者信息

Biedermann Narelle

机构信息

a Nursing, Midwifery and Nutrition , James Cook University , Townsville , Queensland 4811 , Australia.

出版信息

Contemp Nurse. 2018 Feb;54(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1386072. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1080/10376178.2017.1386072
PMID:28975852
Abstract

The Internet and the development of more user-engaging applications have opened a whole new world for researchers as a means of recruitment and data collection source. This paper describes the methodological approach of a research study that explored the experiences of Australian military spouses who packed up their family and home to accompany their spouse on an overseas posting. The study used Facebook as a recruitment tool and then as a data source through the conduct of an asynchronous virtual focus group. This paper outlines the advantages and disadvantages of this unique data source as a means of capturing the voices of a hard-to-reach population.

摘要

互联网以及更多用户参与度高的应用程序的发展,为研究人员开辟了一个全新的世界,成为一种招募手段和数据收集来源。本文描述了一项研究的方法论,该研究探讨了澳大利亚军人配偶的经历,他们收拾好家庭和住所,陪伴配偶进行海外派驻。该研究将脸书用作招募工具,然后通过开展异步虚拟焦点小组将其用作数据来源。本文概述了这种独特数据源作为获取难以接触人群声音的手段的优缺点。

相似文献

1
The use of Facebook for virtual asynchronous focus groups in qualitative research.在定性研究中使用脸书进行虚拟异步焦点小组讨论。
Contemp Nurse. 2018 Feb;54(1):26-34. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1386072. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
2
Recommendations for internet-based qualitative health research with hard-to-reach populations.针对难以接触人群的基于互联网的定性健康研究建议。
Qual Health Res. 2014 Apr;24(4):561-74. doi: 10.1177/1049732314524635. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
3
Adaption and adjustment of military spouses to overseas postings: an online forum study.军嫂对海外派驻任务的适应与调整:一项在线论坛研究
Nurs Health Sci. 2014 Sep;16(3):387-94. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12122. Epub 2014 Mar 17.
4
US military spouses' experiences transitioning abroad: A narrative analysis.美国军属在海外过渡的经历:叙事分析。
Nurs Forum. 2020 Nov;55(4):703-710. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12487. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Facebook as a recruitment tool for adolescent health research: a systematic review.脸书作为青少年健康研究的招募工具:一项系统综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5):439-447.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.05.049.
6
Lessons learned using Web conference technology for online focus group interviews.使用网络会议技术进行在线焦点小组访谈的经验教训。
Qual Health Res. 2015 Jan;25(1):122-33. doi: 10.1177/1049732314549602. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
7
"Social Media has Opened a World of 'Open communication:'" experiences of Adults with Cerebral Palsy who use Augmentative and Alternative Communication and Social Media.“社交媒体开启了一个‘开放交流’的世界”:使用辅助和替代沟通方式及社交媒体的脑瘫成年人的经历
Augment Altern Commun. 2016;32(1):25-40. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2015.1052887. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
8
Utilizing Internet-based recruitment and data collection to access different age groups of former family caregivers.利用基于互联网的招募和数据收集来接触不同年龄段的前家庭照顾者。
Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;44:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
9
Virtual Versus In-Person Focus Groups: Comparison of Costs, Recruitment, and Participant Logistics.虚拟焦点小组与面对面焦点小组:成本、招募及参与者安排的比较
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Mar 22;19(3):e80. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6980.
10
Navigating the challenges of imposter participants in online qualitative research: lessons learned from a paediatric health services study.应对在线定性研究中冒充参与者的挑战:儿科健康服务研究的经验教训
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 12;24(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11166-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging the Power of Online Qualitative Inquiry in Mixed Methods Research: Novel Prospects and Challenges Amidst COVID-19.在混合方法研究中利用在线定性探究的力量:新冠疫情背景下的新前景与挑战
J Mix Methods Res. 2023 Apr;17(2):171-186. doi: 10.1177/15586898221084504. Epub 2022 Apr 17.
2
Exploring gender differences in uptake of GP partnership roles: a qualitative mixed-methods study.探讨性别差异对全科医生合伙角色的影响:一项定性混合方法研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jun 29;73(732):e545-e555. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0544. Print 2023 Jul.
3
Caregivers' assessment of meaningful and relevant clinical outcome assessments for Sanfilippo syndrome.
护理人员对桑菲利波综合征有意义且相关的临床结局评估的评价
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2022 Apr 25;6(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s41687-022-00447-w.
4
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research: Case Study and Lessons Learned.用于健康研究的异步在线焦点小组:案例研究与经验教训
Int J Qual Methods. 2021 Jan-Dec;20. doi: 10.1177/1609406921990489. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
5
WhatsApp-Based Focus Groups Among Mexican-Origin Women in Zika Risk Area: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Data Quality.在寨卡风险地区的墨西哥裔女性中开展基于WhatsApp的焦点小组讨论:可行性、可接受性和数据质量。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Oct 28;5(10):e20970. doi: 10.2196/20970.
6
'Unfocused groups': lessons learnt amid remote focus groups in the Philippines.“无焦点群体”:菲律宾远程焦点小组的经验教训。
Fam Med Community Health. 2021 Aug;9(Suppl 1). doi: 10.1136/fmch-2021-001098.
7
A novel research method for workshops and co-production of interventions: using a secret Facebook group.一种用于研讨会和干预措施共同制作的新颖研究方法:利用Facebook秘密群组。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Nov 2;6(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00711-0.