Department of Psychology, Linnaeus University, Hus L, Trummenvägen 11, 351 95, Växjö, Sweden.
CERCAP, Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Apr 25;7(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00383-9.
Accumulating evidence suggests that individuals with greater executive resources spend less time mind wandering. Independent strands of research further suggest that this association depends on concentration and a guilty-dysphoric daydreaming style. However, it remains unclear whether this association is specific to particular features of executive functioning or certain operationalizations of mind wandering, including task-unrelated thoughts (TUTs, comprising external distractions and mind wandering) and stimulus-independent and task-unrelated thoughts (SITUTs, comprising mind wandering only). This study sought to clarify these associations by using confirmatory factor analysis to compute latent scores for distinct executive functions based on nine cognitive tasks and relating them to experience sampling reports of mind wandering. We expected that individuals with greater executive control (specifically updating) would show a stronger reduction in SITUTs as momentary concentration and guilty-dysphoric style increase. A bifactor model of the cognitive battery indicated a general factor (common executive functioning) and ancillary factors (updating and shifting). A significant interaction between updating and concentration on mind wandering was observed with mind wandering defined as TUTs, but not as SITUTs (N = 187). A post hoc analysis clarified this discrepancy by showing that as concentration increases, both external distractions and mind wandering decrease more strongly among people with greater updating. Moreover, common executive functioning predicted a more negative slope of guilty-dysphoric style on SITUTs, whereas updating and shifting predicted more positive slopes. The opposite slopes of these executive functions on daily life mind wandering may reflect a stability-flexibility trade-off between goal maintenance and goal replacement abilities.
越来越多的证据表明,执行资源较多的个体花在 wandered mind 上的时间较少。独立的研究线索进一步表明,这种关联取决于注意力和内疚性的不愉快白日梦的风格。然而,目前尚不清楚这种关联是否特定于执行功能的某些特征或 wandered mind 的某些操作化,包括与任务无关的思维(包括外部干扰和 wandered mind)和与刺激无关且与任务无关的思维(仅包括 wandered mind)。本研究试图通过使用验证性因素分析来计算基于九项认知任务的不同执行功能的潜在分数,并将其与 wandered mind 的经验采样报告相关联,以澄清这些关联。我们预计,具有较强执行控制(特别是更新)的个体在瞬间注意力和内疚性不愉快风格增加时,SITUTs 的减少幅度会更大。认知电池的双因素模型表明存在一个一般因素(共同执行功能)和辅助因素(更新和转移)。在将 wandered mind 定义为 TUTs 时,观察到更新和注意力之间存在显著的交互作用,但在将 wandered mind 定义为 SITUTs 时则不存在(N=187)。事后分析通过显示当注意力增加时,更新能力较强的人,外部干扰和 wandered mind 的减少幅度更大,从而澄清了这种差异。此外,共同执行功能预测了 SITUTs 上内疚性不愉快风格的斜率更负,而更新和转移则预测了更正的斜率。这些执行功能对日常生活中 wandered mind 的斜率相反可能反映了目标维持和目标替换能力之间的稳定性-灵活性权衡。