• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

72 小时每日随访配对设计中氯己定治疗后的皮肤微生物组特征:一项初步研究。

Cutaneous Microbiome Profiles Following Chlorhexidine Treatment in a 72-Hour Daily Follow-Up Paired Design: a Pilot Study.

机构信息

Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0175321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01753-21. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1128/spectrum.01753-21
PMID:35467392
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9248901/
Abstract

Venous catheter-related bloodstream infections represent a significant problem in the United States. Our objective was to determine daily changes in skin microbiome profiles up to 72h postchlorhexidine treatment. Left and right forearm skin swab samples were obtained from 10 healthy volunteers over 72h at 24h intervals. Dorsal surface of left arm was treated with chlorohexidine gluconate (CHG) at initial time point (T = 0), while the right arm remained untreated (control). Swab samples were obtained shortly before (T = 0) and after CHG treatment (T = 24-48-72h). Bacterial DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene V1-V3 sequencing and taxonomic annotation were performed using ZymoBIOMICS pipeline. PERMANOVA, linear discriminant and bacterial interaction network analyses were performed. A total of 13 total phyla, 273 genera, and 950 total species were detected across all time points, CHG-treated or CHG-untreated. Most abundant species included Cutibacterium acnes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Rothia Mucilaginosa. Low biomass-related inconsistent taxa detection was observed. PERMANOVA suggested a marginal difference between CHG-treated and CHG-untreated microbiome profiles (Genera: P(perm) = 0.0531; Species: P(perm) = 0.0450). Bacterial interaction network guided PERMANOVA analyses detected a microbiome change over time, suggesting a consistent CHG treatment-specific change. LEfSe identified Finegoldia magna, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus thermoamylovorans as the only distinctive species. These species were more abundant and/or present post-CHG treatment in the CHG-treated group. These findings suggest that the skin microbiome was not significantly different 24, 48, or 72h after CHG treatment. Previous culture-based studies have found similar results after 24h. Future studies will be needed to determine the mechanisms of bacterial regrowth after CHG treatment. Annually, over 80,000 central line infections occur in the United States. Understanding the pathogenesis of these infections is crucial. Chlorhexidine is the most commonly used skin preparation before line placement. We hypothesized that the use of chlorhexidine and dressings will alter the normal arm skin microbiome over a period of 72h. We used 16S-rRNA gene next generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the forearm skin microbiome of volunteers. The left arm was swabbed with chlorhexidine and the right arm served as control. The skin microbiome returned to normal after 24h. Our NGS results confirm findings of two previous culture-based studies. Relative abundance of spp. in the chlorhexidine-treated samples was increased, consistent with one previous study. Based on the results of this pilot study, we will need to measure viable bacteria during a 24h time course following chlorhexidine treatment to understand the source of skin microbiome replenishment.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3632/9248901/12ef82076654/spectrum.01753-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3632/9248901/2fe60e153aab/spectrum.01753-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3632/9248901/12ef82076654/spectrum.01753-21-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3632/9248901/2fe60e153aab/spectrum.01753-21-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3632/9248901/12ef82076654/spectrum.01753-21-f002.jpg
摘要

静脉导管相关血流感染是美国的一个严重问题。我们的目的是确定氯己定处理后 72 小时内皮肤微生物组谱的每日变化。在 72 小时内每隔 24 小时从 10 名健康志愿者的左右前臂采集皮肤拭子样本。在初始时间点(T=0)用葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)处理左手臂的背侧表面,而右臂未处理(对照)。在 CHG 处理前(T=0)和处理后(T=24-48-72h)立即采集拭子样本。使用 ZymoBIOMICS 管道进行细菌 DNA 提取、16S rRNA 基因 V1-V3 测序和分类注释。进行 PERMANOVA、线性判别和细菌相互作用网络分析。在所有时间点,CHG 处理或未处理的情况下,共检测到 13 个总门、273 个属和 950 个总种。最丰富的物种包括痤疮丙酸杆菌、表皮葡萄球菌和罗特氏菌。观察到低生物量相关的不一致分类群检测。PERMANOVA 表明 CHG 处理和未处理的微生物组谱之间存在边缘差异(属:P(perm)=0.0531;种:P(perm)=0.0450)。细菌相互作用网络引导的 PERMANOVA 分析检测到随时间的微生物组变化,表明存在一致的 CHG 处理特异性变化。LEfSe 确定了嗜金黄微球菌、短小芽孢杆菌和解淀粉芽孢杆菌为唯一独特的物种。这些物种在 CHG 处理组中更丰富和/或在 CHG 处理后存在。这些发现表明,CHG 处理后 24、48 或 72 小时皮肤微生物组没有明显差异。以前的基于培养的研究在 24 小时后发现了类似的结果。未来的研究将需要确定 CHG 处理后细菌再生长的机制。每年,美国有超过 80,000 例中心导管感染。了解这些感染的发病机制至关重要。氯己定是放置导管前最常用的皮肤准备药物。我们假设氯己定和敷料的使用会在 72 小时内改变正常手臂皮肤的微生物组。我们使用 16S-rRNA 基因下一代测序(NGS)来确定志愿者的前臂皮肤微生物组。左臂用氯己定擦拭,右臂作为对照。24 小时后,皮肤微生物组恢复正常。我们的 NGS 结果证实了两项先前基于培养的研究的发现。在氯己定处理样本中, 属的相对丰度增加,与一项先前的研究一致。基于这项初步研究的结果,我们将需要在 CHG 处理后 24 小时的时间过程中测量活菌,以了解皮肤微生物组补充的来源。

相似文献

1
Cutaneous Microbiome Profiles Following Chlorhexidine Treatment in a 72-Hour Daily Follow-Up Paired Design: a Pilot Study.72 小时每日随访配对设计中氯己定治疗后的皮肤微生物组特征:一项初步研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0175321. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01753-21. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
2
Does adding hydrogen peroxide to chlorhexidine gluconate increase the effectiveness of skin preparation in reducing cutaneous Cutibacterium levels? A randomized controlled trial.在降低皮肤表皮葡萄球菌水平方面,向葡萄糖酸氯己定中添加过氧化氢是否会提高其效果?一项随机对照试验。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Sep;33(9):1905-1908. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 May 28.
3
Relationship between chlorhexidine gluconate skin concentration and microbial density on the skin of critically ill patients bathed daily with chlorhexidine gluconate.洗必泰葡萄糖酸皮肤浓度与重症患者每日用洗必泰葡萄糖酸沐浴后皮肤微生物密度的关系。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Sep;33(9):889-96. doi: 10.1086/667371. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
4
Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of residual chlorhexidine gluconate on skin following repetitive exposure to saline and wiping with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/70% isopropyl alcohol pre-operative skin preparations.重复暴露于生理盐水后,使用 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定/70%异丙醇术前皮肤准备擦拭对皮肤残留葡萄糖酸氯己定的离体和体内评估。
J Hosp Infect. 2019 Jul;102(3):256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
5
The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate on the skin microbiota of children and adults: A pilot study.葡萄糖酸氯己定对儿童和成人皮肤微生物群的影响:一项初步研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):1014-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Suppression of regrowth of normal skin flora under chlorhexidine gluconate dressings applied to chlorhexidine gluconate-prepped skin.葡萄糖酸洗必泰敷料抑制葡萄糖酸洗必泰备皮后正常皮肤菌群再生。
Am J Infect Control. 2012 May;40(4):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.03.030. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
7
Inguinal microbiome in patients undergoing an endovascular aneurysm repair: Application of next-generation sequencing of the 16S-23S rRNA regions.接受血管内动脉瘤修复术患者的腹股沟微生物组:16S-23S rRNA 区域的下一代测序应用。
Med Hypotheses. 2019 Nov;132:109358. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109358. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
8
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine-alcohol versus chlorhexidine-alcohol for surgical skin preparation on the aerobic and anaerobic skin flora of the shoulder region.聚维酮碘-酒精与洗必泰-酒精用于肩部手术备皮对需氧和厌氧皮肤菌群的抗菌效果比较。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2021 Jan 22;10(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-00874-8.
9
Sustained reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections with enhancement of catheter bundle by chlorhexidine dressings over 11 years.11 年间,通过使用氯己定敷料增强导管套件,持续降低导管相关血流感染率。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Jun;45(6):823-833. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05617-x. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
10
A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units.社区医院重症监护病房葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴的多中心实用中断时间序列分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):791-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.23. Epub 2016 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Short- and long-term impact of aseptic bathing strategies on the skin microbiome in ICU patients.无菌沐浴策略对重症监护病房患者皮肤微生物群的短期和长期影响。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2025 Jul 22;214(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s00430-025-00843-1.
2
Still not sterile: viability-based assessment of the skin microbiome following pre-surgical application of a broad-spectrum antiseptic reveals transient pathogen enrichment and long-term recovery.仍然未达无菌状态:术前应用广谱抗菌剂后基于生存能力的皮肤微生物群评估显示,存在短暂的病原体富集和长期恢复情况。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Apr 10;13(5):e0287324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02873-24.
3
Community assembly of the human piercing microbiome.

本文引用的文献

1
, an Anaerobic Gram-Positive Bacterium of the Normal Human Microbiota, Induces Inflammation by Activating Neutrophils.一种正常人类微生物群中的厌氧革兰氏阳性细菌,通过激活中性粒细胞诱导炎症。
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jan 29;11:65. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00065. eCollection 2020.
2
Microbiome applications for pathology: challenges of low microbial biomass samples during diagnostic testing.微生物组在病理学中的应用:诊断检测中低微生物生物量样本面临的挑战。
J Pathol Clin Res. 2020 Apr;6(2):97-106. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.151. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
3
Effects of sampling strategy and DNA extraction on human skin microbiome investigations.
人体穿孔微生物组的群落组装。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Nov 29;290(2011):20231174. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.1174.
4
Oral microbiomes of patients with infective endocarditis (IE): a comparative pilot study of IE patients, patients at risk for IE and healthy controls.感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者的口腔微生物群:IE患者、IE风险患者和健康对照的比较性初步研究。
J Oral Microbiol. 2022 Nov 15;15(1):2144614. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2022.2144614. eCollection 2023.
采样策略和 DNA 提取对人体皮肤微生物组研究的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 21;9(1):17287. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53599-z.
4
Molecular mechanism of antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.氯己定对耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌抗菌活性的分子机制。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 29;14(10):e0224107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224107. eCollection 2019.
5
Skin colonization at peripheral intravenous catheter insertion sites increases the risk of catheter colonization and infection.皮肤定植于外周静脉导管插入部位会增加导管定植和感染的风险。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Dec;47(12):1484-1488. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
6
A multidimensional perspective on microbial interactions.从多维角度看待微生物相互作用。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Jun 1;366(11). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz125.
7
The impact of chlorhexidine gluconate on the skin microbiota of children and adults: A pilot study.葡萄糖酸氯己定对儿童和成人皮肤微生物群的影响:一项初步研究。
Am J Infect Control. 2019 Aug;47(8):1014-1016. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.01.024. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
A Comparison of Techniques for Collecting Skin Microbiome Samples: Swabbing Versus Tape-Stripping.皮肤微生物组样本采集技术的比较:擦拭法与胶带剥离法。
Front Microbiol. 2018 Oct 2;9:2362. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02362. eCollection 2018.
9
Comprehensive skin microbiome analysis reveals the uniqueness of human skin and evidence for phylosymbiosis within the class Mammalia.全面的皮肤微生物组分析揭示了人类皮肤的独特性,并为哺乳动物纲内的菌系共生提供了证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jun 19;115(25):E5786-E5795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1801302115. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
10
The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2018 update.Galaxy 平台:用于可访问、可重复和协作的生物医学分析:2018 年更新。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Jul 2;46(W1):W537-W544. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky379.