Pavan Alessandra Fernandes Gonçalves, Barbosa Jurandir Antonio, Aguiar Flávio Henrique Baggio, Basting Roberta Tarkany
Gen Dent. 2022 May-Jun;70(3):34-40.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the influence of brushing with regular or whitening dentifrices on the change in color and micromorphologic surface of ceramic orthodontic brackets subjected to coffee staining. Fifty ceramic brackets were subjected to cycles of coffee staining followed by brushing according to the following groups (n = 10): C, control (no brushing); DW, brushing with distilled water; CT, brushing with Colgate Total 12 Clean Mint (regular toothpaste); COW, brushing with Colgate Optic White (containing 1% hydrogen peroxide); and CUWA, brushing with Close-Up White Attraction (containing blue covarine). The color of the brackets was assessed using the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) Lab* system at 5 different timepoints: prior to staining (baseline) and after 1, 7, 14, and 21 days of staining and brushing cycles. The surface micromorphology of the brackets was assessed at the baseline timepoint and after 21 days. Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Friedman, and Nemenyi tests were applied (α = 0.05) for the statistical analysis. The C group demonstrated a significant reduction in L* and a significant increase in a* and b* values over time. For the DW group, the L* value was reduced but was higher than in the C group, and there were also significant increases in a* and b* from baseline values. A significant increase in the a* and b* values was observed in all groups (P < 0.05). Total color change (∆E*) increased over the period of evaluation for all whitening groups, although only the CT group presented significantly lower ∆E* than the other dentifrices. At the end of the test period, only the COW group exhibited a surface with higher porosity. None of the dentifrices prevented the brackets from staining, but they did reduce the magnitude of color change caused by coffee. The most significant difference was found in the CT group. Micromorphologic surface changes were observed when COW was employed.
本研究的目的是评估使用普通牙膏或美白牙膏刷牙对遭受咖啡染色的陶瓷正畸托槽颜色变化和微观形态表面的影响。五十个陶瓷托槽按照以下分组(n = 10)进行咖啡染色循环,随后进行刷牙:C组,对照组(不刷牙);DW组,用蒸馏水刷牙;CT组,用高露洁全效12清新薄荷牙膏(普通牙膏)刷牙;COW组,用高露洁皓齿美白牙膏(含1%过氧化氢)刷牙;CUWA组,用佳洁士美白之星牙膏(含蓝色可丽蓝)刷牙。使用国际照明委员会(CIE)Lab系统在5个不同时间点评估托槽颜色:染色前(基线)以及染色和刷牙循环1、7、14和21天后。在基线时间点和21天后评估托槽的表面微观形态。应用Kruskal-Wallis、Dunn、Friedman和Nemenyi检验(α = 0.05)进行统计分析。随着时间推移,C组的L值显著降低,a值和b值显著增加。对于DW组,L值降低,但高于C组,a值和b值也相对于基线值显著增加。所有组的a值和b值均显著增加(P < 0.05)。在评估期间,所有美白组的总颜色变化(∆E)均增加,尽管只有CT组的∆E*显著低于其他牙膏组。在测试期结束时,只有COW组的表面孔隙率较高。没有一种牙膏能防止托槽染色,但它们确实减少了咖啡引起的颜色变化程度。CT组的差异最为显著。使用COW牙膏时观察到了微观形态表面变化。