San Francisco Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2022 Mar;6:e2100160. doi: 10.1200/CCI.21.00160.
The COVID-19 pandemic created an imperative to re-examine the role of telehealth in oncology. We studied trends and disparities in utilization of telehealth (video and telephone visits) and secure messaging (SM; ie, e-mail via portal/app), before and during the pandemic.
Retrospective cohort study of hematology/oncology patient visits (telephone/video/office) and SM between January 1, 2019, and September 30, 2020, at Kaiser Permanente Northern California.
Among 334,666 visits and 1,161,239 SM, monthly average office visits decreased from 10,562 prepandemic to 1,769 during pandemic, telephone visits increased from 5,114 to 8,663, and video visits increased from 40 to 4,666. Monthly average SM increased from 50,788 to 64,315 since the pandemic began. Video visits were a significantly higher fraction of all visits ( < .01) in (1) younger patients (Generation Z 48%, Millennials 46%; Generation X 40%; Baby Boomers 34.4%; Silent Generation 24.5%); (2) patients with commercial insurance (39%) compared with Medicaid (32.7%) or Medicare (28.1%); (3) English speakers (33.7%) compared with those requiring an interpreter (24.5%); (4) patients who are Asian (35%) and non-Hispanic White (33.7%) compared with Black (30.1%) and Hispanic White (27.5%); (5) married/domestic partner patients (35%) compared with single/divorced/widowed (29.9%); (6) Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 3 (36.2%) compared with > 3 (31.3%); and (7) males (34.6%) compared with females (32.3%). Similar statistically significant SM utilization patterns were also seen.
In the pandemic era, hematology/oncology telehealth and SM use rapidly increased in a manner that is feasible and sustained. Possible disparities existed in video visit and SM use by age, insurance plan, language, race, ethnicity, marital status, comorbidities, and sex.
COVID-19 大流行促使人们重新审视远程医疗在肿瘤学中的作用。我们研究了大流行前后远程医疗(视频和电话就诊)和安全信息传递(SM;即通过门户/应用程序的电子邮件)利用的趋势和差异。
回顾性队列研究了 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 9 月 30 日期间, Kaiser Permanente Northern California 血液科/肿瘤科患者的就诊情况(电话/视频/办公室)和 SM。
在 334666 次就诊和 1161239 次 SM 中,大流行前每月平均门诊就诊次数从 10562 次降至 1769 次,电话就诊次数从 5114 次增至 8663 次,视频就诊次数从 40 次增至 4666 次。自大流行开始以来,每月平均 SM 增加了 50788 到 64315。视频就诊在所有就诊中所占比例(<0.01)明显更高,(1)在年轻患者(Z 世代 48%,千禧一代 46%;X 世代 40%;婴儿潮一代 34.4%;沉默世代 24.5%)中更高;(2)在商业保险(39%)患者中高于医疗补助(32.7%)或医疗保险(28.1%);(3)在讲英语(33.7%)的患者中高于需要口译(24.5%);(4)在亚裔(35%)和非西班牙裔白人(33.7%)患者中高于黑人和西班牙裔白人(30.1%);(5)在已婚/配偶患者(35%)中高于单身/离婚/丧偶(29.9%);(6)Charlson 合并症指数≤3(36.2%)高于>3(31.3%);(7)男性(34.6%)高于女性(32.3%)。SM 的使用也存在类似的具有统计学意义的差异。
在大流行时代,血液科/肿瘤科远程医疗和 SM 的使用迅速增加,而且这种方式是可行且可持续的。在视频就诊和 SM 使用方面,年龄、保险计划、语言、种族、民族、婚姻状况、合并症和性别方面可能存在差异。