Suppr超能文献

治疗两个或更多跖骨骨折。

Treatment of two or more metatarsal fractures.

机构信息

Université de Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

Université de Lorraine, 54505 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.

出版信息

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Feb;110(1):103285. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103285. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Metatarsal fractures are the most common type of foot fracture. When surgical treatment is needed, pinning is typically used, either percutaneous or open. However, this fixation method has been criticized by some authors who lament residual malunion and prefer to use plate and/or screws. The primary objective of our study was to compare the outcomes of K-wire versus plate and/or screw fixation for the surgical treatment of two or more metatarsal fractures. The secondary objective was to evaluate the factors that contribute to poor outcomes and complications. We hypothesized that plate and/or screw fixation will produce better functional outcomes than K-wire fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective and retrospective multicenter study carried out between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Three functional scores were determined (AOFAS, FAAM and SF12 physical and mental) preoperatively, postoperatively and at the final assessment. We evaluated the outcomes in the entire study population and in four injury type subgroups, including one with isolated metatarsal fractures to control analysis bias.

RESULTS

Our analysis compiled data from 165 patients (123 men, 42 women) who had a mean age of 38 years (16-82). The mean follow-up time was 27.9months (10-120). There were no complications in 130 patients (79%). Skin necrosis occurred in 25 patients (15%). The FAAM score was significantly higher in the plate and/or screw group 70.2 (17-84) versus 60.3 (31-84) in the K-wire group (P=0.033). The 78 (19-100) AOFAS was higher, but not significantly, in the plate and/or screw group versus 70 (12-100) in the K-wire group (P=0.144).

CONCLUSION

Trauma to the foot that causes a fracture in two or more metatarsals often occurs due to a crush injury (39%). The frequency of associated bone lesions means that a preoperative CT scan should be done routinely to analyze the injury pattern and determine the best treatment. The fixation method should be adapted to the local conditions; when possible, it is preferable to use rigid fixation with plates and/or screws as it yields better functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; study with retrospective component.

摘要

简介

跖骨骨折是最常见的足部骨折类型。当需要手术治疗时,通常采用经皮或开放式钢针固定。然而,这种固定方法受到了一些作者的批评,他们对残留的愈合不良感到遗憾,更喜欢使用钢板和/或螺钉。我们的主要研究目的是比较克氏针与钢板和/或螺钉固定治疗两例或更多跖骨骨折的结果。次要目标是评估导致不良结果和并发症的因素。我们假设钢板和/或螺钉固定将产生比克氏针固定更好的功能结果。

材料和方法

这是一项前瞻性和回顾性的多中心研究,于 2010 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 6 月 1 日进行,随访时间至少 12 个月。在术前、术后和最终评估时,我们确定了三种功能评分(AOFAS、FAAM 和 SF12 身体和精神)。我们评估了整个研究人群以及四个损伤类型亚组的结果,包括一个单独跖骨骨折的亚组以控制分析偏差。

结果

我们的分析汇总了 165 名患者(123 名男性,42 名女性)的数据,平均年龄为 38 岁(16-82 岁)。平均随访时间为 27.9 个月(10-120 个月)。130 名患者(79%)无并发症。25 名患者(15%)发生皮肤坏死。钢板和/或螺钉组的 FAAM 评分显著高于克氏针组(70.2[17-84]比 60.3[31-84],P=0.033)。钢板和/或螺钉组的 AOFAS 为 78(19-100),虽然没有显著差异,但高于克氏针组的 70(12-100)(P=0.144)。

结论

足部骨折通常是由挤压伤引起的(39%),导致两个或更多跖骨骨折。伴发骨损伤的频率意味着应常规进行术前 CT 扫描,以分析损伤模式并确定最佳治疗方法。固定方法应适应局部情况;在可能的情况下,最好使用钢板和/或螺钉进行刚性固定,因为它可以获得更好的功能结果。

证据水平

IV;有回顾性成分的研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验