• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

父爱缺失、精子捐献者和“那又怎样?”——通过“世界文学”论证捐献受孕的不道德性

Fatherlessness, sperm donors and 'so what?' parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through 'world literature'.

机构信息

Department of English, Theatre and Creative Writing, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK

出版信息

Med Humanit. 2022 Dec;48(4):e18. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012328. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1136/medhum-2021-012328
PMID:35470154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9691809/
Abstract

Is biology and knowing biological ancestral information essential to the construction of identity? Bioethicist James David Velleman believes this is the case and argues that donor gamete conception is immoral because a portion of genetic heritage will be unknown. Velleman is critical of sperm donation and the absence of a biological father in donor-assisted families. His bioethical work, specifically the 2005 article 'Family History', is oft-cited in articles debating the ethics surrounding gamete donations and diverse family formations. However, I wonder to what extent Velleman's ethical stance is exhibited in contemporary culture? Velleman suggests that innate knowledge of bio-superiority helps readers and audiences appreciate the importance of biological family structures in literature and film; he says, 'When people deny the importance of biological ties, I wonder how they can read world literature with any comprehension' (2005, 369). Velleman understands the stories of Oedipus, Moses, Telemachus and Luke Skywalker as demonstrating a universal cultural comprehension that genetics are essential to identity construction. I adopt Velleman's list of stories and ask if they really can support an antidonation sentiment and suggest that most of the stories actually support diverse family structures. By exploring the significance of story-telling in cultural understandings of family and identity, it is possible to identify the ways in which story-telling can impact how society negotiates complex issues such as assisted reproduction, donor conception and donor industry regulation.

摘要

生物学和了解生物祖先信息对于身份构建是否至关重要?生物伦理学家詹姆斯·大卫·维勒曼认为这是事实,并认为配子捐赠受孕是不道德的,因为一部分遗传遗产将是未知的。维勒曼批评了精子捐赠和捐赠辅助家庭中缺乏生物学上的父亲。他的生物伦理著作,特别是 2005 年的文章《家族史》,在关于配子捐赠和多样化家庭形成的伦理问题的文章中经常被引用。然而,我想知道维勒曼的伦理立场在当代文化中表现到了何种程度?维勒曼认为,对生物优越性的先天了解有助于读者和观众欣赏生物家庭结构在文学和电影中的重要性;他说:“当人们否认生物联系的重要性时,我想知道他们怎么能读懂世界文学”(2005 年,第 369 页)。维勒曼理解俄狄浦斯、摩西、忒勒马科斯和卢克·天行者的故事,认为这些故事展示了一种普遍的文化理解,即遗传学对身份构建至关重要。我采用了维勒曼列出的故事,并询问它们是否真的可以支持反捐赠情绪,并认为这些故事实际上大多支持多样化的家庭结构。通过探索讲故事在家庭和身份的文化理解中的重要性,可以确定讲故事如何影响社会如何协商辅助生殖、捐赠受孕和捐赠行业监管等复杂问题。

相似文献

1
Fatherlessness, sperm donors and 'so what?' parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through 'world literature'.父爱缺失、精子捐献者和“那又怎样?”——通过“世界文学”论证捐献受孕的不道德性
Med Humanit. 2022 Dec;48(4):e18. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012328. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
2
Does donor conception violate human dignity?供体受孕是否侵犯人类尊严?
Bioethics. 2022 Nov;36(9):957-963. doi: 10.1111/bioe.13081. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
3
Same-sex mothers' experiences of equal treatment, parenting stress and disclosure to offspring: a population-based study of parenthood following identity-release sperm donation.同性母亲在平等对待、育儿压力和向子女披露方面的经历:基于身份释放精子捐赠的亲子关系的基于人群的研究。
Hum Reprod. 2022 Oct 31;37(11):2589-2598. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac194.
4
Ethical and legal issues in the use of related donors for therapeutic insemination.使用亲属供体进行治疗性人工授精的伦理和法律问题。
Urol Clin North Am. 2002 Nov;29(4):855-61. doi: 10.1016/s0094-0143(02)00089-7.
5
Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: key issues for practitioners and stakeholders.直接面向消费者的基因检测与配子捐赠受孕的变化格局:从业者和利益相关者的关键问题。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2024 Jan;48(1):103421. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103421. Epub 2023 Sep 24.
6
It takes two to tango: information-sharing with offspring among heterosexual parents following identity-release sperm donation.探戈需两人共舞:身份公开的精子捐赠后异性父母与子女间的信息共享
Hum Reprod. 2016 Jan;31(1):125-32. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev293. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
7
Donor sibling relations among adult offspring conceived via insemination by lesbian parents.通过女同性恋父母的授精孕育的成年后代之间的供体亲缘关系。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Nov 2;38(11):2166-2174. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead175.
8
Choreographies of sperm donations: dilemmas of intimacy in lesbian couple donor conception.舞出精子捐赠的舞步:女同性恋伴侣供精受孕中亲密关系的困境
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Dec;73(11):1661-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.033. Epub 2011 Oct 10.
9
Origins and originators: lesbian couples negotiating parental identities and sperm donor conception.起源与创始人:女同性恋伴侣协商父母身份与精子捐赠受孕。
Cult Health Sex. 2012;14(3):297-311. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2011.639392. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
10
Parents' disclosure to their donor-conceived children in the last 10 years and factors affecting disclosure: a narrative review.近 10 年来父母对其捐精受孕子女的披露情况,以及影响披露的因素:叙事性综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Jul 1;30(4):488-527. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae010.

本文引用的文献

1
A longitudinal study of families formed through reproductive donation: Parent-adolescent relationships and adolescent adjustment at age 14.通过生殖捐赠形成的家庭的纵向研究:父母-青少年关系和青少年在 14 岁时的适应情况。
Dev Psychol. 2017 Oct;53(10):1966-1977. doi: 10.1037/dev0000372. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information.
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):631-50.
3
Donor conception and children's rights: "first, do no harm".捐赠受孕与儿童权利:“首要的是,不造成伤害”。
CMAJ. 2011 Feb 8;183(2):280. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101388. Epub 2011 Jan 10.