• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information.

作者信息

Allan Sonia

出版信息

J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):631-50.

PMID:22908608
Abstract

Donor conception has historically been shrouded in secrecy. Such secrecy has been underpinned by social views and legal issues concemrning the adults involved in the process--the donor, the recipient parent(s), and, at times, the doctor. However, there is increasing recognition of the need to focus upon donor-conceived people's interests and rights to have identifying and non-identifying information about their donors. This editorial examines issues raised in relation to information release, while also introducing some of the arguments presented by other authors in this Special Issue of the JLM. It also considers recent Australian federal and State government inquiries that have favoured information release and the former Victorian Infertility Treatment Authority's service model to support people in the process of information access and release. While there has been a clear shift to favouring openness and honesty, legislative action is still required to ensure the balancing and realisation of people's interests.

摘要

相似文献

1
Donor conception, secrecy and the search for information.
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):631-50.
2
Access to information about donors by donor-conceived individuals: a human rights analysis.由捐赠受孕个体获取有关捐赠者的信息:一项人权分析。
J Law Med. 2013 Mar;20(3):655-70.
3
Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.拟议的立法变更要求追溯性披露身份识别信息:与捐赠者的磋商及政府回应
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det434. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
4
The rights of donor inseminated children to know their genetic origins in Australia.在澳大利亚,通过捐赠精子受孕出生的孩子了解其遗传起源的权利。
Aust J Fam Law. 2005 Dec;19(3):222-44.
5
Legal parent versus biological parent: the impact of disclosure.法定父母与生物学父母:信息披露的影响。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):790-802.
6
Donor-conceived individuals and access to information about their genetic origins: the relevance and role of rights.通过捐赠受孕出生的个体及其获取有关其遗传起源信息的权利:权利的相关性和作用。
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):742-57.
7
Information rights and donor conception: lessons from adoption?信息权与捐赠受孕:领养带来的启示?
J Law Med. 2012 Jun;19(4):722-41.
8
Psycho-social, ethical and legal arguments for and against the retrospective release of information about donors to donor-conceived individuals in Australia.关于在澳大利亚支持和反对向通过捐赠受孕出生的个人追溯披露捐赠者信息的社会心理、伦理和法律论据。
J Law Med. 2011 Dec;19(2):354-76.
9
The management of genetic origins: secrecy and openness in donor assisted conception in Israel and elsewhere.遗传起源的管理:以色列及其他地区供体辅助生殖中的保密与公开
Hum Reprod. 1998 Nov;13(11):3268-73. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3268.
10
Privacy on thin ice? Considering the California Court of Appeal decision in Johnson v. Superior Court.隐私岌岌可危?评加利福尼亚上诉法院对约翰逊诉高等法院一案的判决
Jurimetrics. 2001 Fall;42(1):73-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosing a genetic disease in a donor-conceived child: case report and discussion of the ethical, legal, and practical issues.诊断供体受孕儿童的遗传疾病:病例报告及伦理、法律和实际问题讨论
Pediatr Nephrol. 2025 Mar;40(3):859-864. doi: 10.1007/s00467-024-06556-6. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
2
Fatherlessness, sperm donors and 'so what?' parentage: arguing against the immorality of donor conception through 'world literature'.父爱缺失、精子捐献者和“那又怎样?”——通过“世界文学”论证捐献受孕的不道德性
Med Humanit. 2022 Dec;48(4):e18. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012328. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
3
A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies Investigating Motives and Experiences of Recipients of Anonymous Gamete Donation.
一项关于调查匿名配子捐赠受赠者动机和经历的定性研究的系统评价。
Front Sociol. 2022 Feb 16;7:746847. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.746847. eCollection 2022.
4
How best to protect the vital interests of donor-conceived individuals: prohibiting or mandating anonymity in gamete donations?如何最好地保护通过捐赠配子受孕者的切身利益:禁止还是强制实行配子捐赠匿名制?
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2017 Apr 28;3:100-108. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2017.01.003. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Italian law on medically assisted reproduction: do women's autonomy and health matter?意大利辅助生殖医学法:女性的自主权与健康重要吗?
BMC Womens Health. 2016 Jul 23;16:44. doi: 10.1186/s12905-016-0324-4.
6
Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?捐赠受孕信息披露:指导性咨询还是非指导性咨询?
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Sep;13(3):369-79. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9686-9. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
7
Gamete donors' expectations and experiences of contact with their donor offspring.配子捐赠者对与他们的捐赠后代接触的期望和经历。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Apr;29(4):731-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu027. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
8
Proposed legislative change mandating retrospective release of identifying information: consultation with donors and Government response.拟议的立法变更要求追溯性披露身份识别信息:与捐赠者的磋商及政府回应
Hum Reprod. 2014 Feb;29(2):286-92. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det434. Epub 2013 Dec 6.