Suppr超能文献

非侵入性脑刺激戒烟:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Non-invasive brain stimulation for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Addictology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.

University of Burgundy, Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice, Dijon, France.

出版信息

Addiction. 2022 Nov;117(11):2768-2779. doi: 10.1111/add.15889. Epub 2022 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) methods have showed promising results for the treatment of tobacco use disorder, but little is known about the efficacy of NIBS on sustained tobacco abstinence. We aimed to assess its effectiveness for long-term smoking cessation.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT). PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, PsycINFO and clinical trials registries were systematically searched for relevant studies up to May 2021. Relevant studies included adult smokers seeking smoking cessation, included in an RCT using NIBS [specifically repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)], and with follow-up of more than 4 weeks. There were no restrictions on location. Abstinence rates in the active NIBS groups were compared with abstinence rates in sham NIBS or in usual treatment groups, from 4 weeks to 12 months following the quit attempt. Smoking abstinence was measured on an intention-to-treat basis and we used risk ratios (RRs) as measures of effect size.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included (n = 699 patients). In all included studies, the control groups were receiving sham NIBS and only data from 3 to 6 months were analysable. By pooling the seven included studies, the RR of sustained abstinence of any form of NIBS relative to sham NIBS was 2.39 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-4.55; I  = 40%]. Subgroup analyses found that the RR was even higher when excitatory rTMS was used on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RR = 4.34; 95% CI = 1.69-11.18; I  = 0%) or when using deep rTMS targeting the lateral prefrontal cortex and insula bilaterally (RR = 4.64; 95% CI = 1.61-13.39; I  = 0%). A high risk of bias was found in four included studies. We also determined, using grades of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation, that overall there was a low level of confidence in the results.

CONCLUSION

Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) may improve smoking abstinence rates from 3 to 6 months after quitting smoking, compared with sham NIBS or usual treatment.

摘要

背景和目的

非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)方法在治疗烟草使用障碍方面显示出了有前景的结果,但对于 NIBS 对长期烟草戒断的疗效知之甚少。我们旨在评估其对长期戒烟的有效性。

方法

对随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。系统检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Embase、PsycINFO 和临床试验登记处截至 2021 年 5 月的相关研究。相关研究包括寻求戒烟的成年吸烟者,纳入了使用 NIBS(特别是重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和经颅直流电刺激(tDCS))的 RCT,并随访超过 4 周。地点没有限制。在戒烟尝试后 4 周到 12 个月,比较活跃的 NIBS 组与假 NIBS 组或常规治疗组的戒烟率。使用意向治疗测量吸烟戒断率,我们使用风险比(RR)作为效应量的测量指标。

结果

纳入了 7 项研究(n=699 名患者)。在所有纳入的研究中,对照组接受的是假 NIBS,只有 3 到 6 个月的数据可以进行分析。通过汇总这 7 项纳入的研究,与假 NIBS 相比,任何形式的 NIBS 的持续戒烟的 RR 为 2.39[95%置信区间(CI)=1.26-4.55;I=40%]。亚组分析发现,当在左侧背外侧前额叶皮层使用兴奋性 rTMS(RR=4.34;95%CI=1.69-11.18;I=0%)或双侧外侧前额叶皮层和岛叶使用深部 rTMS 时,RR 甚至更高(RR=4.64;95%CI=1.61-13.39;I=0%)。在 4 项纳入的研究中发现存在高偏倚风险。我们还使用推荐评估、发展和评价的等级确定,总体而言,对结果的信心水平较低。

结论

与假 NIBS 或常规治疗相比,非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)可能会在戒烟后 3 到 6 个月提高戒烟率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验