Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN.
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Jun;70:53-60. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.04.007. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
To examine differences in elevated eating disorder risk and self-reported eating disorder diagnosis across subgroups of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) college students.
Data from 5057 TGD college students participating in the national Healthy Minds Study between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed. Chi-square tests and logistic regression analyses examined heterogeneity in prevalence and odds of elevated eating disorder risk, as measured by the SCOFF, and self-reported eating disorder diagnosis by gender, as well as by intersecting gender and sexual orientation identities.
Genderqueer and/or non-conforming college students reported the highest prevalence of elevated eating disorder risk (38.8%) relative to gender expansive students. Genderqueer and/or non-conforming (11.1%), gender expansive (12.3%), and trans men and/or transmasculine students (10.5%) reported higher prevalence of a self-reported eating disorder diagnosis relative to trans women and/or transfeminine students (6.3%). Heterosexual or straight trans men had lower odds of eating disorder risk and self-reported diagnosis relative to trans men with a minoritized sexual orientation.
Genderqueer and/or non-conforming college students may be at heightened eating disorder risk. Moreover, a heterosexual and/or straight sexual orientation was associated with lower odds of elevated eating disorder risk and self-reported eating disorder diagnoses among trans men and genderqueer and/or non-conforming college students, but this finding did not hold for other groups. College campuses should aim to reduce eating disorder risk among TGD students.
研究跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)大学生亚组中,进食障碍风险升高和自我报告进食障碍诊断的差异。
对 2014 年至 2019 年期间参与全国健康心理研究的 5057 名 TGD 大学生的数据进行了分析。卡方检验和逻辑回归分析检查了性别、性别和性取向身份交叉时,SCOFF 评估的进食障碍风险升高的患病率和比值比的异质性,以及自我报告的进食障碍诊断。
与性别扩张型学生相比,性别酷儿和/或非传统型大学生报告的进食障碍风险升高的患病率最高(38.8%)。性别酷儿和/或非传统型(11.1%)、性别扩张型(12.3%)和跨男性和/或跨男性气质学生(10.5%)报告的自我报告进食障碍诊断的患病率高于跨女性和/或跨女性气质学生(6.3%)。异性恋或直的跨男性与少数性取向的跨男性相比,进食障碍风险和自我报告诊断的可能性较低。
性别酷儿和/或非传统型大学生可能处于更高的进食障碍风险之中。此外,异性恋和/或直的性取向与跨男性和性别酷儿和/或非传统型大学生中升高的进食障碍风险和自我报告的进食障碍诊断的可能性降低有关,但这一发现并不适用于其他群体。大学校园应努力降低 TGD 学生的进食障碍风险。