• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为重度精神疾病患者提供的支持性就业:一项对具有特殊要素的意大利社会企业的试点研究。

Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a pilot study of an Italian social enterprise with a special ingredient.

作者信息

Martinelli Alessandra, Bonetto Chiara, Bonora Federica, Cristofalo Doriana, Killaspy Helen, Ruggeri Mirella

机构信息

Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.

Unit of Clinical Psychiatry, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni Di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni, 4, 25125, Brescia, BS, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03881-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-022-03881-8
PMID:35473634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9040313/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with mental disorders are far more likely to be unemployed than the general population. Two internationally recognized, evidence-based models of interventions for employment for people with severe mental health problems are Individual Placement Support and the Clubhouse. In Italy, a common model is the 'social enterprise' (SE), which is a programme run by non-profit organisations that help individuals with disabilities to be employed. Despite SEs spread and relevance in Italy, there are no studies about Italian samples. This paper reports on a pilot evaluation of psychosocial and work outcomes of a SE based in Verona, Italy. The study aims to investigate if people with SMI involved in SE job placements may achieve personal recovery and better outcomes over time, and in comparison with a comparable group of users.

METHODS

This is a pilot descriptive study with three components. A longitudinal design that comprised a functioning description of 33 SE members with a psychiatric disability in two time-points (when they joined the SE-on average 5 years before the study recruitment, and at the study recruitment-year 2018); and a repeated collection of job details of the 33 members in three time points: 2 years before the recruitment,-year 2016; 1 year before the recruitment - year 2017; and at the recruitment-year 2018. An assessment at the recruitment time-year 2018, of SE users' satisfaction with the job placement, symptoms, functioning, and quality of life (QoL). A cross-sectional study that compared the 33 SE members at the recruitment time-year 2018, with a matched group of people with the following criteria: living in local supported accommodations, being unemployed and not SE members. The two groups were compared on ratings of psychopathology, functioning, and QoL. Descriptive analyses were done.

RESULTS

At the recruitment time - year 2018, all SE participants showed a significant better functioning (p < 0.001) than when they joined the SE-when they had been employed for an average of 5 years. In comparison to the matched group, SE members had significantly better functioning (p = 0.001), psychopathology (p = 0.007), and QoL (p = 0.034). According to their SE membership status, participants comprised trainees (21.2%) and employee members (78.8%). Trainees compared to employees had lower autonomies, functioning, QoL and more severe psychopathology. Over the two years prior to study recruitment, trainees showed stable poor autonomies, while employee members showed a variation from average autonomies in the 2 years before the recruitment time - year 2016, to good ones at the recruitment time - year 2018. Over the two years, all SE members set increasing numbers of objectives in all three domains. All SE participants reported high levels of satisfaction with all aspects of the job placement.

CONCLUSIONS

SE that provides tailored support to assist people to gain employment skills may be an effective component in helping recovery from SMI.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0089/9040313/c55c2faae583/12888_2022_3881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0089/9040313/c55c2faae583/12888_2022_3881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0089/9040313/c55c2faae583/12888_2022_3881_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

与普通人群相比,精神障碍患者失业的可能性要高得多。针对严重精神健康问题患者的就业干预措施有两种国际认可的、基于证据的模式,即个别安置支持和俱乐部模式。在意大利,一种常见的模式是“社会企业”(SE),这是一个由非营利组织运营的项目,旨在帮助残疾人士就业。尽管社会企业在意大利广泛存在且具有重要意义,但尚无关于意大利样本的研究。本文报告了对意大利维罗纳一家社会企业的心理社会和工作成果的试点评估。该研究旨在调查参与社会企业工作安置的严重精神疾病患者是否能随着时间推移实现个人康复并取得更好的成果,并与一组类似的使用者进行比较。

方法

这是一项具有三个组成部分的试点描述性研究。纵向设计包括对33名有精神疾病残疾的社会企业成员在两个时间点的功能描述(他们加入社会企业时——平均在研究招募前5年,以及在研究招募时——2018年);并在三个时间点重复收集这33名成员的工作细节:招募前2年——2016年;招募前1年——2017年;以及招募时——2018年。在2018年招募时,对社会企业使用者对工作安置、症状、功能和生活质量(QoL)的满意度进行评估。一项横断面研究将2018年招募时的33名社会企业成员与一组符合以下标准的匹配人群进行比较:居住在当地支持性住所、失业且不是社会企业成员。比较两组在精神病理学、功能和生活质量方面的评分。进行了描述性分析。

结果

在2018年招募时,所有社会企业参与者的功能表现均显著优于他们加入社会企业时(平均就业5年)(p < 0.001)。与匹配组相比,社会企业成员在功能(p = 0.001)、精神病理学(p = 0.007)和生活质量(p = 0.034)方面表现明显更好。根据他们的社会企业成员身份,参与者包括学员(21.2%)和员工成员(78.8%)。与员工相比,学员的自主性、功能、生活质量较低,精神病理学更严重。在研究招募前的两年里,学员的自主性一直较差,而员工成员的自主性从2016年招募前两年的平均水平,变化到2018年招募时的良好水平。在这两年中,所有社会企业成员在所有三个领域设定的目标数量都在增加。所有社会企业参与者对工作安置的各个方面都表示高度满意。

结论

提供量身定制的支持以帮助人们获得就业技能的社会企业可能是帮助严重精神疾病康复的有效组成部分。

相似文献

1
Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a pilot study of an Italian social enterprise with a special ingredient.为重度精神疾病患者提供的支持性就业:一项对具有特殊要素的意大利社会企业的试点研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 26;22(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-03881-8.
2
[A group cognitive behavioral intervention for people registered in supported employment programs: CBT-SE].针对参与支持性就业项目人员的团体认知行为干预:认知行为疗法-支持性就业
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40 Suppl 2:S81-90. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.005. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
Individualised placement and support programme for people unemployed because of chronic pain: a feasibility study and the InSTEP pilot RCT.因慢性疼痛而失业的人群的个体化安置和支持计划:一项可行性研究和 InSTEP 试点 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Jan;25(5):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta25050.
4
Quality of life, symptom severity and level of functioning in people with severe mental illness ready for hospital discharge.准备出院的重度精神疾病患者的生活质量、症状严重程度及功能水平
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Feb;29(1):14-24. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12703. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
5
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
6
[Practices and interventions related to the work integration of people with a severe mental illness: work outcomes and avenues of research].[与重度精神疾病患者工作整合相关的实践与干预措施:工作成果及研究途径]
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40 Suppl 2:S33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.001. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
7
[Social cooperatives in Italy].[意大利的社会合作社]
Encephale. 2014 Jun;40 Suppl 2:S57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
8
[The Clubhouse model for people with severe mental illnesses: Literature review and French experiment].[针对重度精神疾病患者的俱乐部模式:文献综述与法国实验]
Encephale. 2015 Dec;41(6):477-86. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.针对重度精神障碍患者日间护理效果的系统评价:(1)急性日间医院与住院治疗对比;(2)职业康复;(3)日间医院与门诊护理对比。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. doi: 10.3310/hta5210.
10
Job Retention and Reintegration in People with Mental Health Problems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Supported Employment Routine Programs.精神健康问题患者的工作保留和重返工作岗位:支持性就业常规方案的描述性评估。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2023 Jan;50(1):128-136. doi: 10.1007/s10488-022-01227-w. Epub 2022 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the economic case for public health interventions provided in non-health public sector settings: a feasibility study in job centres in Cornwall, South West of England.评估在非卫生公共部门环境中提供公共卫生干预措施的经济合理性:在英格兰西南部康沃尔郡就业中心开展的一项可行性研究。
Discov Ment Health. 2025 May 1;5(1):67. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00195-5.
2
Individual placement and support; service development and implementation of an evidence-based practice in Iran.个体安置与支持;伊朗循证实践的服务开发与实施
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(1):62. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00174-w.
3
The key pillars of psychosocial disability: a European perspective on challenges and solutions.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance and effectiveness of step progressive care pathways within mental health supported accommodation services in Italy.意大利心理健康支持性住宿服务中逐步递进式护理路径的实施情况与效果
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 May;57(5):939-952. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02128-3. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
2
Implementation of Individual Placement and Support in Italy: The Reggio Emilia Experience.个体安置与支持在意大利的实施:雷焦艾米利亚的经验。
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Aug;56(6):1128-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00603-w. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
3
Italian psychiatry - 25 years of change.
心理社会残疾的关键支柱:欧洲对挑战与解决方案的看法
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 7;16:1574301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1574301. eCollection 2025.
4
Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of Recovery-Oriented Practices in an Italian Community Mental Health Service: A Pilot Study.意大利社区心理健康服务中以康复为导向的实践的可行性、可接受性和影响:一项试点研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 27;14(7):2280. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072280.
5
Evaluation of a flexible assertive community treatment (FACT) program for patients with severe mental illness: an observational study in Salzburg, Austria.针对重度精神疾病患者的灵活主动社区治疗(FACT)项目评估:奥地利萨尔茨堡的一项观察性研究
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2024 Feb 9;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13033-024-00628-8.
6
Exploring gender impact on collaborative care planning: insights from a community mental health service study in Italy.探索协作式护理计划的性别影响:来自意大利社区心理健康服务研究的见解。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 13;23(1):834. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05307-5.
意大利精神病学——25年的变迁
Int Psychiatry. 2003 Oct 1;1(2):14-17. eCollection 2003 Oct.
4
Mental health supported accommodation services in England and in Italy: a comparison.英格兰和意大利的心理健康支持性住宿服务:比较。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Nov;54(11):1419-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01723-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
5
Reducing perceived stigma: Work integration of people with severe mental disorders in Italian social enterprise.减少感知到的耻辱感:意大利社会企业中重度精神障碍患者的工作融合
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018 Jun;41(2):125-134. doi: 10.1037/prj0000299. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
[Using large current databases to analyze mental health services].[利用大型当前数据库分析心理健康服务]
Epidemiol Prev. 2018 Jan-Feb;42(1):98-99. doi: 10.19191/EP18.1.P098.028.
7
Development and Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales-Residential Facility (HoNOS-RF).《健康国家结局量表-住宿设施版(HoNOS-RF)的制定与验证》。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Jun;89(2):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9548-1.
8
Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.针对重度精神疾病成年人获得和维持就业的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD011867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011867.pub2.
9
A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Clubhouse Model of Psychosocial Rehabilitation.对心理社会康复俱乐部模式证据的系统评价
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):28-47. doi: 10.1007/s10488-016-0760-3.
10
Work Demands-Burnout and Job Engagement-Job Satisfaction Relationships: Teamwork as a Mediator and Moderator.工作需求-职业倦怠与工作投入-工作满意度关系:团队合作作为中介和调节变量
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015 Mar 15;3(1):176-83. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2015.024. Epub 2015 Feb 13.